Neuroaesthetics

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 370-375

  Chatterjee, Anjan ^a   Vartanian, Oshin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEUROLOGY; SEMANTICS;

BIOLOGICAL BASIS; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCES; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; INFLECTION POINTS; NATURAL OBJECTS; NEURAL SYSTEMS; NEUROAESTHETICS; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ART; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; ESTHETICS; FACIES; FACILITATION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; NEUROESTHETICS; NEUROSCIENCE; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; BRAIN; INDIVIDUALITY; NERVE TRACT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ART; BRAIN; ESTHETICS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; NEURAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84903133352     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Neuroaesthetics 2009, Baywood Publishing Company. M. Skov, O. Vartanian (Eds.).
2. Chatterjee A. Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:53-62.
3. Nadal M., Pearce M.T. The Copenhagen Neuroaesthetics Conference: prospects and pitfalls for an emerging field. Brain Cogn. 2011, 76:172-183.
4. Brown S., et al. Naturalizing aesthetics: brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. Neuroimage 2011, 58:250-258.
5. Croft J. The challenges of interdisciplinary epistemology in neuroaesthetics. Mind Brain Educ. 2011, 5:5-11.
6. Tallis R. The limitations of a neurological approach to art. Lancet 2008, 372:19-20.
7. Chatterjee A. Where there be dragons: finding the edges of neuroaesthetics. Am. Soc. Neuroaesth. Newsl. 2011, 31:4-6.
8. Brown S., Dissanayake E. The arts are more than aesthetics: neuroaesthetics as narrow aesthetics. Neuroaesthetics 2009, 43-57. Baywood Publishing Company. M. Skov, O. Vartanian (Eds.).
9. Shimamura A.P. Towards a science of aesthetics. Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains and Experience 2012, 3-28. Oxford University Press. A.P. Shimamura, S.E. Palmer (Eds.).
10. Chatterjee A. The Aesthetic Brain: How We Evolved to Desire Beauty and Enjoy Art 2014, Oxford University Press.
11. Thakral P.P., et al. A neural mechanism for aesthetic experience. Neuroreport 2012, 23:310-313.
12. Kawabata H., Zeki S. Neural correlates of beauty. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 91:1699-1705.
13. Yue X., et al. The neural basis of scene preferences. Neuroreport 2007, 18:525-529.
14. Chatterjee A., et al. The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology 2009, 23:135-143.
15. Biederman I., Vessel E.A. Perceptual pleasure and the brain. Am. Sci. 2006, 94:247-253.
16. Gallese V., et al. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 1996, 119:593-609.
17. Cattaneo L., Rizzolatti G. The mirror neuron system. Arch. Neurol. 2009, 66:557-560.
18. Freedberg D., Gallese V. Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:197-203.
19. Umilta M.A., et al. Abstract art and cortical motor activation: an EEG study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:311.
20. Kühn S., Gallinat J. The neural correlates of subjective pleasantness. Neuroimage 2012, 61:289-294.
21. Kim H., et al. Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:18253-18258.
22. Vartanian O., Goel V. Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. Neuroreport 2004, 15:893-897.
23. Jacobsen T., et al. Brain correlates of aesthetic judgments of beauty. Neuroimage 2005, 29:276-285.
24. Jacobs R.H.A.H., et al. Neural correlates of visual aesthetics - beauty as the coalescence of stimulus and internal state. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e31248.
25. Ishizu T., Zeki S. Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e21852.
26. Vartanian O., et al. Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:10446-10453.
27. Kirk U., et al. Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2009, 44:1125-1132.
28. Lacey S., et al. Art for reward's sake: visual art recruits the ventral striatum. Neuroimage 2011, 55:420-433.
29. Leder H., et al. Entitling art: influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 2006, 121:176-198.
30. Millis K. Making meaning brings pleasure: the influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion 2001, 1:320-329.
31. Newman G.E., Bloom P. Art and authenticity: the importance of originals in judgments of value. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012, 141:558-569.
32. Huang M., et al. Human cortical activity evoked by the assignment of authenticity when viewing works of art. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2011, 5:134.
33. Seeley W.P. Art, meaning, and perception: a question of methods for a cognitive neuroscience of art. Br. J. Aesth. 2013, 53:443-460.
34. Noguchi Y., Murota M. Temporal dynamics of neural activity in an integration of visual and contextual information in an esthetic preference task. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:1077-1084.
35. Tolstoy L. What is Art 1899, Crowell & Co.
36. Collingwood R.G. The Principles of Art 1958, Oxford University Press.
37. Osaka N., et al. Neural correlates of delicate sadness: an fMRI study based on the neuroaesthetics of Noh masks. Neuroreport 2012, 23:26-29.
38. Munar E., et al. Lateral orbitofrontal cortex involvement in initial negative aesthetic impression formation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e38152.
39. Berridge K.C., et al. Dissecting components of reward: 'liking', 'wanting', and learning. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2009, 9:65-73.
40. Ortony A., et al. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions 1988, Cambridge University Press.
41. Raichle M.E., et al. A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:676-682.
42. Buckner R.L., et al. The brain's default network. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1124:1-38.
43. Christoff K., et al. Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:8719-8724.
44. Vessel E.A., et al. The brain on art: intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:66.
45. Vessel E.A., et al. Art reaches within: aesthetic experience, the self and the default mode network. Front. Neurosci. 2013, 7:258.
46. Cupchik G.C., et al. Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain Cogn. 2009, 70:84-91.
47. Critchley H.D., et al. Activity in the human brain predicting differential heart rate responses to emotional facial expressions. Neuroimage 2005, 24:751-762.
48. Cela-Conde C.J., et al. Dynamics of brain networks in the aesthetic appreciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110(Suppl. 2):10454-10461.
49. Roseman I.J., Smith C.A. Appraisal theory: overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research 2001, 3-19. Oxford University Press. S.R. Klaus (Ed.).
50. Sylvia P.J. Human emotions and aesthetic experience. Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience 2012, 250-275. Oxford University Press. A. Shimamura, S. Palmer (Eds.).
51. Chatterjee A. The neuropsychology of visual artists. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1568-1583.
52. Chatterjee A. Prospects for a neuropsychology of art. Neuroaesthetics 2009, 131-143. Baywood Publishing Company. M. Skov, O. Vartanian (Eds.).
53. Zaidel D. Neuropsychology of Art 2005, Psychology Press.
54. Bogousslavsky J., Boller F. Neurological Disorders in Famous Artists 2005, Karger.
55. Miller B.L., et al. Emergence of artistic talent in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 1998, 51:978-982.
56. Sacks O. The landscape of his dreams. An Anthropologist on Mars 1995, 153-187. Alfred A. Knopf.
57. Lythgoe M., et al. Obsessive, prolific artistic output following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2005, 64:397-398.
58. Chatterjee A. The neuropsychology of visual art: conferring capacity. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2006, 74:39-49.
59. Selfe L. Nadia. A Case of Extraordinary Drawing Ability in an Autistic Child 1977, Academic Press.
60. Kwon J., et al. Neural correlates of clinical symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2003, 122:37-47.
61. Gardner H. The Shattered Mind. The Person After Brain Damage 1975, Alfred A. Knopf.
62. Heller W. Cognitive and emotional organization of the brain: influences on the creation and perception of art. Neuropsychology 1994, 271-292. Academic Press. D. In: Zaidel (Ed.).
63. Zaimov K., et al. Aphasie chez un peintre. Encephale 1969, 58:377-417.
64. Brown J. Mind, Brain, and Consciousness. The Neuropsychology of Cognition 1977, Academic Press.
65. Sherwood K. How a cerebral hemorrhage altered my art. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:55.
66. Miller B., Hou C. Portraits of artists: Emergence of visual creativity in dementia. Arch. Neurol. 2004, 61:842-844.
67. Maurer K., Prvulovic D. Paintings of an artist with Alzheimer's disease: visuoconstructive deficits during dementia. J. Neural Transm. 2004, 111:235-245.
68. Crutch S., et al. Some workmen can blame their tools: artistic change in an individual with Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 2001, 347:1096-1098.
69. van Buren B., et al. Changes in painting styles of two artists with Alzheimer's disease. Psychol. Aesth. Creativity Arts 2013, 7:89-94.
70. Garrels G. Three toads in the garden: line, color, and form. Willem de Kooning. The Late Paintings, The 1980s 1995, 9-37. San Francisco Museum of Modern Art and Walker Arts Center.
71. Cattaneo Z., et al. The world can look better: enhancing beauty experience with brain stimulation. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2013, 10.1093/scan/nst165.
72. Leder H., et al. How art is appreciated. Psychol. Aesth. Creativity Arts 2012, 6:2-10.
73. Hekkert P., van Wieringen P.C.W. The impact of level of expertise on the evaluation of original and altered versions of post-impressionistic paintings. Acta Psychol. 1996, 94:117-131.
74. Fairhall S.L., Ishai A. Neural correlates of object indeterminacy in art compositions. Conscious. Cogn. 2008, 17:923-932.
75. Bullot N.J., Reber R. The artful mind meets art history: toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Behav. Brain Sci. 2013, 36:123-137.
76. Gopnik B. Aesthetic science and artistic knowledge. Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains and Experience 2012, 129-159. Oxford University Press. A.P. Shimamura, S.E. Palmer (Eds.).
77. Tinio P.P.L. From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: the mirror model of art. Psychol. Aesth. Creativity Arts 2013, 7:265-275.
78. Poldrack R. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:59-63.
79. Zeki S. Art and the brain. J. Conscious. Stud. 1999, 6:76-96.
80. Zeki S., Lamb M. The neurology of kinetic art. Brain 1994, 117:607-636.
81. Cavanagh P. The artist as neuroscientist. Nature 2005, 434:301-307.
82. Tinbergen N. Curious Naturalist 1954, Basic Books.
83. Ramachandran V.S., Hirstein H. The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. J. Conscious. Stud. 1999, 6:15-51.
84. Conway B.R., Livingstone M.S. Perspectives on science and art. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17:476-482.
85. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Analysis of Visual Behavior 1982, 549-586. MIT Press. D.J. Ingle (Ed.).
86. Livingstone M. Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing 2002, Abrams.
87. Chatterjee A. Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bull. Psychol. Arts 2004, 4:55-59.
88. Leder H., et al. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Br. J. Psychol. 2004, 95:489-508.
89. Martindale C. How does the brain compute aesthetic experience?. Gen. Psychol. 2001, 36:25-35.
90. Cela-Conde C.J., et al. Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:3847-3852.
91. Kirk U., et al. Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: a parametric fMRI study. Brain Cogn. 2009, 69:306-315.
92. Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999, 3. 452-460.
93. Hönekopp J. Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2006, 32:199-209.
94. Vartanian O., et al. Middle temporal gyrus encodes individual differences in perceived facial attractiveness. Psychol. Aesth. Creativity Arts 2013, 7:38-47.
95. Kanwisher N., Yovel G. Cortical specialization for face perception in humans. Handbook of Neuroscience for the Behavioral Sciences 2009, 841-858. Wiley and Sons. J.T. Cacioppo, G.G. Bernston (Eds.).
96. Weiner K., Grill-Spector K. Neural representations of faces and limbs neighbor in human high-level visual cortex: evidence for a new organization principle. Psychol. Res. 2013, 77:74-97.
97. Vessel E.A., Rubin N. Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images. J. Vis. 2010, 10:18.
98. Chatterjee A., et al. The assessment of art attributes. Emp. Stud. Arts 2010, 28:207-222.
99. Chatterjee A., et al. Artistic production following brain damage: a study of three artists. Leonardo 2011, 44:405-410.