Lateral orbitofrontal cortex involvement in initial negative aesthetic impression formation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Munar, Enric ^a   Nadal, Marcos ^a   Rosselló, Jaume ^a   Flexas, Albert ^a   Moratti, Stephan ^b   Maestú, Fernando ^b   Marty, Gisèle ^a   Cela Conde, Camilo J ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE FÍSICA INTERDISCIPLINAR Y SISTEMAS COMPLEJOS IFISC CSIC UIB   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INITIAL NEGATIVE AESTHETIC IMPRESSION; LATERAL ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; ORBITAL CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ESTHETICS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84861844031     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038152     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cela-Conde CJ, Marty G, Maestú F, Ortiz T, Munar E, et al. (2004) Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 6321-6325 doi:10.1073/pnas.0401427101.
2. Jacobsen T, Schubotz RI, Höfel L, von Cramon DY, (2006) Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage 29: 276-285 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010.
3. Cupchik GC, Vartanian O, Crawley A, Mikulis DJ, (2009) Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic response. Brain Cognition 70: 84-91 doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003.
4. Kirk U, Skov M, Hulme O, Christensen MS, Zeki S, (2009) Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 44: 1125-1132 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009.
5. Munar E, Nadal M, Castellanos NP, Flexas A, Maestú F, et al. (2012) Aesthetic appreciation: event-related field and time-frequency analyses. Front Hum Neurosci 5: 185 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00185.
6. Nadal M, Pearce MT, (2011) The Copenhagen Neuroaesthetics conference: Prospects and pitfalls for an emerging field. Brain Cognition 76: 172-183 doi::10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.009.
7. Locher P, Krupinski E, Mello-Thoms C, Nodine CF, (2008) Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spatial Vision 1-2: 55-77.
8. Jacobsen T, Höfel L, (2003) Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cogn Affect Behav Ne 3: 289-299.
9. Looft WR, Baranowski M, (1971) An analysis of five measures of sensation seeking and preference for complexity. J Gen Psychol 85: 307-313.
10. Frith CD, Nias DKB, (1974) What determines aesthetic preferences? J Gen Psychol 91: 163-173.
11. Chevrier J, Delorme A, (1980) Aesthetic preferences: influence of perceptual ability, age and complexity of stimulus. Percept Motor Skill 50: 839-849.
12. Maestú F, Ortiz T, Fernández A, Amo C, Martin P, et al. (2002) Spanish language mapping using MEG: a validation study. Neuroimage 17: 1579-1586 doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08844-2.
13. Hauk O, Keil A, Elbert T, Müller MM, (2002) Comparison of data transformation procedures to enhance topographical accuracy in time series analysis of human EEG. J Neurosci Meth 113: 111-122 doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(01)00484-8.
14. Dale AM, Liu AK, Fischl BR, Buckner RL, Belliveau JW, et al. (2000) Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26: 55-67 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81138-1.
15. Collins DL, Zijdenbos AP, Kollokian V, Sled JG, Kabani NJ, et al. (1998) Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE T Med Imaging 17: 463-468.
16. Mangin JF, (1995) From 3D magnetic resonance images to structural representations of the cortex topography using topology preserving deformations. J Math Imaging Vis 5: 297-318.
17. Sarvas J, (1987) Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 32: 11-22.
18. Cela-Conde CJ, Ayala FJ, Munar E, Maestú F, Nadal M, et al. (2009) Sex related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 3847-3852 doi:10.1073/iti1009106.
19. Höfel L, Jacobsen T, (2007) Electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics: A result of judgment categorization or judgment report? J Psychophysiol 21: 9-21 doi:10.1027/0269-8803.21.1.9.
20. Zysset S, Huber O, Ferstl EC, von Cramon DY, (2002) The anterior frontomedial cortex and evaluative judgment: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 15: 983-991.
21. Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET, (2004) The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Prog Neurobiol 72: 341-372 doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.006.
22. Kawabata H, Zeki S, (2004) Neural correlates of beauty. J Neurophysiol 91: 1699-1705 doi:10.1152/jn.00696.2003.
23. Kirk U, (2008) The Neural Basis of Object-Context Relationships on Aesthetic Judgement. Plos ONE, 3: e3754 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003754.
24. Windmann S, Kirsch P, Mier D, Stark R, Walter B, et al. (2006) On framing effects in decision making: linking lateral versus medial orbitofrontal cortex activation to choice outcome processing. J Cognitive Neurosci 18: 1198-1211 doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1198.
25. Liang XY, Zebrowitz LA, Zhang Y, (2010) Neural activation in the oreward circuito shows a nonlinear response to facial attractiveness. Soc Neurosci 5: 320-334.
26. O'Doherty JP, Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET, Hornak J, Andrews C, (2001) Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 4: 95-102 doi:10.1038/82959.
27. Kim H, Shimojo S, O'Doherty JP, (2006) Is avoiding an aversive outcome rewarding? Neural substrates of avoidance learning in the human brain. Plos Biol 4: e233 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040233.
28. Bray S, Shimojo S, O'Doherty JP, (2010) Human medial orbitofrontal cortex is recruited during experience of imagined and real rewards. J Neurophysiol 103: 2506-2512 doi:10.1152/jn.01030.2009.
29. O'Doherty JP, Critchley H, Deichmann R, Dolan RJ, (2003) Dissociating valence of outcome from behavioral control in human orbital and ventral prefrontal cortices. J Neurosci 23: 7931-7939.
30. Elliott R, Dolan RJ, Frith C, (2000) Dissociable functions in the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex: Evidence from human neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 10: 308-317 doi:10.1093/cercor/10.3.308.
31. Elliott R, Agnew Z, Deakin JFW, (2010) Hedonic and Informational Functions of the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex. Cereb Cortex 20: 198-204 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp092.
32. Grabenhorst F, Rolls ET, (2009) Different representations of relative and absolute subjective value in the human brain. Neuroimage 48: 258-268 doi:10.3389/conf.neuro.09.2009.01.20.
33. Tremblay L, Schultz W, (1999) Relative reward preference in primate orbitofrontal cortex. Nature 398: 704-708 doi:10.1038/19525.
34. FitzGerald THB, Seymour B, Dolan RJ, (2009) The role of human orbitofrontal cortex in value comparison for incommensurable objects. J Neurosci 29: 8388-8395 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0717-09.2009.
35. Nadal M, Munar E, Capó MA, Rosselló J, Cela-Conde CJ, (2008) Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spat Vis 21: 379-396 doi:10.1163/156856808784532653.