LOVE AT FIRST SIGHT OR SUSTAINED EFFECT? THE ROLE OF PERCEIVED AFFECTIVE QUALITY ON USERS’ COGNITIVE REACTIONS TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 283-296

  Zhang, Ping ^a   Li, Na ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; behavioral intention; emotion; individuals reactions to technology; perceived affective quality; perceived ease of use; perceived usefulness

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

AFFECT; AFFECTIVE REACTIONS; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; EMOTION; INDIVIDUAL’ REACTION TO TECHNOLOGY; PERCEIVED AFFECTIVE QUALITIES; PERCEIVED EASE-OF-USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; POTENTIAL CHANGE; THEORETICAL MODELING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84903016484     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Agarwal, R., and Karahanna, E. “Time Flies When You’re Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information Technology Usage,” MIS Quarterly (24:4), 2000, pp. 665-694.
2. Ajzen, I. “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes (50:2), 1991, pp. 179-211.
3. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
4. Bagozzi, R. P. “A Field Investigation of Causal Relations Among Cognitions, Effect, Intentions and Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research (10), November 1982, pp. 562-584.
5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R. “The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration,” Technology Studies (2:2), 1995, pp. 285-309.
6. Brave, S., and Nass, C. “Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction,” in The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, J. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 2003, pp. 81-96.
7. Brief, A. P. “Organizational Behavior and the Study of Affect: Keep Your Eyes on the Organization,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (86:1), September 2001, pp. 131-139.
8. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., and Berntson, G. G. “The Affect System Has Parallel and Integrative Processing Components: Form Follows Function,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (76), 1999, pp. 839-855.
9. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., and Carson, S. “Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior,” Journal of Retailing (77:4), 2001, pp. 511-535.
10. Chin, W. W. “The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling,” in Modern Methods for Business Research, G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1998.
11. th International Conference on Information Systems, J. I. DeGross, A. Srinivasan, and S. L. Jarvenpaa (Eds.), Cleveland, OH, 1996.
12. Cockton, G. “From Doing to Being: Bringing Emotion into Interaction,” Interacting with Computers (14:2), 2002, pp. 89-92.
13. Damasio, A. R. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, Putnam Publishing Group, New York, 1994.
14. Davis, F. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), September 1989, pp. 319-340.
15. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science (35:8), August 1989, pp. 982-1003.
16. Finneran, C. M., and Zhang, P. “A Person–Artefact–Task (PAT) Model of Flow Antecedents in Computer-Mediated Environments,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (59:4), 10 2003, pp. 475-496.
17. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA., 1975.
18. Forgas, J. P. “Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM),” Psychological Bulletin (117:1), 1 1995, pp. 39-66.
19. Forgas, J. P., and George, J. M. “Affective Influences on Judgments and Behavior in Organizations: An Information Processing Perspective,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (86:1), 9 2001, pp. 3-34.
20. Fornell, C., and Bookstein, F. L. “Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Customer Exit-Voice Theory,” Journal of Marketing Research (19:11), 1982, pp. 440-452.
21. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Errors,” Journal of Marketing Research (18:2), 1981, pp. 39-50.
22. Ghani, J. “Flow in Human Computer Interactions: Test of a Model,” in Human Factors in Information Systems: Emerging Theoretical Bases, J. Carey (Ed.), Ablex Publishing Corp., Mahwah, NJ, 1995.
23. Goodhue, D. L. “Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems,” Management Science (41:12), December 1995, pp. 1827-1844.
24. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998.
25. Hall, R. H., and Hanna, P. “The Impact of Web Page Text-Background Colour Combinations on Readability, Retention, Aesthestics, and Behavior Intention,” Behaviour & Information Technology (23:3), 2004, pp. 183-195.
26. Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K.-K., and Saarinen, T. “A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects,” MIS Quarterly (24:2), 2000, pp. 299-325.
27. Kim, J., Lee, J., and Choi, D. “Designing Emotionally Evocative Homepages: An Empirical Study of the Quantitative Relations between Design Factors and Emotional Dimensions,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (59:6), 12 2003, pp. 899-940.
28. Lavie, T., and Tractinsky, N. “Assessing Dimensions of Perceived Visual Aesthetics of Web Sites,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (60:3), March 2004, pp. 269-298.
29. Lohmoller, J.-B. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany. 1989.
30. Mittal, V., Ross, J., and William T. “The Impact of Positive and Negative Affect and Issue Framing on Issue Interpretation and Risk Taking,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (76:3), 12 1998, pp. 298-324.=
31. Morris, W. N. Mood: The Frame of Mind, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.
32. Mundorf, M., Westin, S., and Dholaski, N. “Effects of Hedonic Components and User’s Gender on the Acceptance of Screen-Based Information Services,” Behaviour & Information Technology (12:5), 1993, pp. 293-303.
33. Norman, D. A. “Emotion and Design: Attractive Things Work Better,” Interactions: New Visions of Human-Computer Interaction (9:4), July–August 2002, pp. 36-42.
34. Petty, R. E., DeSteno, D., and Rucker, D. D. “The Role of Affect in Attitude Change,” in Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition, J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2001, pp. 212-233.
35. Rozell, E. J., and Gardner III, W. L. “Cognitive, Motivation, and Effective Processes Associated with Computer-Related Performance: A Path Analysis,” Computers in Human Behavior (16:2), 2000, pp. 199-222.
36. Russell, J. A. “A Circumplex Model of Affect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (39), 1980, pp. 1161-1178.
37. Russell, J. A. “Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion,” Psychological Review (110:1), 1 2003, pp. 145-172.
38. Russell, J. A., and Pratt, G. “A Description of the Affective Quality Attributed to Environments,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (38), 1980, pp. 311-322.
39. Thatcher, J. B., and Perrewe, P. L. “An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy,” MIS Quarterly (26:4), December 2002, pp. 381-396.
40. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., and Ikar, D. “What Is Beautiful Is Usable,” Interacting with Computers (13), 2000, pp. 127-145.
41. Van der Heijden, H. “Factors Influencing the Usage of Websites—The Case of a Generic Portal in the Netherlands,” Information & Management (40:6), 2003, pp. 541-549.
42. Venkatesh, V. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research (11:4), 2000, pp. 342-365.
43. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science (46:2), 2000, pp. 186-204.
44. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly (27:3), September 2003, pp. 425-478.
45. Watson, D., and Tellegen, A. “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (54), 1988, pp. 1063-1070.
46. Webster, J., and Martocchio, J. J. “Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure with Workplace Implications,” MIS Quarterly (16:1), 1992.
47. Weiss, H. M., Nicholas, J. P., and Daus, C. S. “An Examination of the Joint Effects of Affective Experiences and Job Beliefs on Job Satisfaction and Variations in Affective Experiences over Time,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (78:1), 4 1999, pp. 1-24.
48. Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., and Jöreskog, K. G. “Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions,” Educational and Psychological Measurement (34), 1974, pp. 25-33.
49. Yoo, Y., and Alavi, M. “Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus,” MIS Quarterly (25:3), 2001, pp. 371-390.
50. Zajonc, R. B. “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences,” American Psychologist (35:2), February 1980, pp. 151-175.