Sustainable access to copyrighted digital information works in developing countries

International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 142-187

  Okediji, Ruth L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903001910     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511494529.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (105)

1. OECD, THE NEW ECONOMY: BEYOND THE HYPE (2001)
2. OECD, MEASURING THE INFORMATION ECONOMY (2002)
3. OECD, ICT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FROM OECD COUNTR I E S, INDUSTRIES AND FIRMS (2003)
4. OECD, SEIZING THE BENEFITS OF ICTINADI GITAL ECONOMY (2003). These reports are available at www.oecd.org.
5. J.H. Reichman & Tracy Lewis, Using Liability Rules to Stimulate Local Innovation in Developing Countries: Application to Traditional Knowledge [this volume]
6. J.H. Reichman, Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation, 53 VAND. L. REV. 1743 (2000).
7. J.H. Reichman & Pamela Samuelson, Intellectual Property Rights in Data?, 50 VAND. L. REV. 51, 148 (1997).
8. J.H. Reichman, Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigm, 94 COLUM. L. REV. 2432 (1994).
9. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 Apr. 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, LEGAL INSTRUMENTS – RESULTS OF THE URUGUAY ROUND vol. 31, 33 I.L.M. 81 (1994) [hereinafter TRIPS Agreement].
10. Laura N. Gasaway, The New Access Right and Its Impact on Libraries and Library Users, 10 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 269 (2003).
11. J.H. Reichman & Jonathan A. Franklin, Privately Legislated Intellectual Property Rights: Reconciling Freedom of Contract with Public Good Uses of Information, 147 U. PA. L. REV. 875 (1999).
12. Ian Ayres & Eric Talley, Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Cosean Trade, 104 YALE L.J. 1027 (1995).
13. Peter Drahos, The Regulation of Public Goods [this volume].
14. William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, Indefinitely Renewable Copyright, 70 U. CHI. L. REV. 471, 489–90 (2003).
15. Peter S. Menell, An Analysis of the Scope of Copyright Protection for Application Programs, 41 STAN. L. REV. 1045, 1059 (1989) (software).
16. Laurence R. Helfer, Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, 29 YALE J. I NT’ L L. 1, 5 (2004).
17. James Thuo Gathii, Rights, Patents, Markets and the Global AIDS Pandemic, 14 F LA. J. INT’ L L. 261, 324 (2002).
18. Keith E. Maskus & Jerome H. Reichman, The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods [this volume].
19. JESSICA LITMAN, DIGITAL COPYRIGHT: PROTECTING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ON THE INTERNET, 23, 135–63 (Prometheus Books 2001).
20. Graeme Dinwoodie, The New International Intellectual Property Law System: New Actors, New Institutions, New Sources, 98 ASIL PROC. (2004).
21. Wendy J. Gordon, Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors, 82 COLUM. L. REV. 1600 (1982).
22. Julie E. Cohen, Lochner in Cyberspace, 97 MICH. L. REV. 462, 476, 566–67 (1998).
23. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Technological Protection Systems for Digitized Copyrighted Works: A Report to Congress, 4–10 (2003), available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/olia/teachreport.pdf (describingmethods of digital rightsmanagement).
24. RuthGana Okediji, Copyright and Public Welfare in Global Perspective, 7 IND. J. G LOBAL L EGAL S TUD. 117 (1999).
25. Ruth L. Okediji, Public Welfare and the Role of the WTO: Reconsidering the TRIPS Agreement, 17 EMORY I NT.’ L L. R EV. 819 (2003).
26. Carlos M. Correa, Managing the Provision of Knowledge: The Design of Intellectual Property Laws, in P ROVIDING G LOBAL P UBLIC G OODS:MANAGING G LOBALI ZATION 410 (I ng e Kau l et al. eds., 20 03).
27. Peter Drahos, BITs and BIPs, 4 J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. L. 791, 791–92 (2001).
28. WIPO Copyright Treaty, 36 I.L.M. 65, S. Treaty Doc. No. 105–17, at 1 (1997) (Status as of 15 July 2004), available at http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/documents/pdf/s-wct.pdf.
29. WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, 36 I.L.M. 76, S. Treaty Doc. No. 105–17, at 18 (1997)(Status on 15 July 2004) available at http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/documents/pdf/s-wppt.pdf.
30. Paul Crampton & Milos Barutciski, Trade Distorting Private Restraints: A Practical Agenda for Future Action, 6 SW. J. L. & TRADE AM. 3, 56 (1999).
31. Robert L. McGeorge, The Pollution Haven Problem in International Law: Can the International Community Harmonize Liberal Trade, Environmental and Economic Development Policies?, 12 WI S. INT’ L L. J. 277, 354–55 (1994).
32. R. Downes, New Diplomacy for the Biodiversity Trade: Biodiversity, Biotechnology, and Intellectual Property in the Convention on Biological Diversity, 4 TOURO J. TRANSNAT’ L L. 1, 29 (1993).
33. SAMRI CKETSON, THE B ERNE C ONV ENT ION FOR THE P ROTE CTI ON OF L I T ERARY A ND A RTI STIC W OR K S: 1886–1986, at 35–36 (Kluwer 1987).
34. Ruth Okediji, Back to Bilateralism? Pendulum Shifts in International Intellectual Property Protection, 1 U. O TTAWA J. L. & T ECH. 125 (2004).
35. RICKE TSON, above n. 42, at 26–38 (1987) (describing the origins, extent and nature of bilateral copyright agreements).
36. Salah Basalamah, Compulsory Licensing for Translation: An Instrument of Development?, 40 IDEA 503, 507–509 (2000)
37. Dorothy M. Schrader, Analysis of the Protocol Regarding Developing Countries, 17 BUL L. COPYR I GHT S OC’ Y 166, 182–83 (1969–70)
38. Howard D. Sacks, Crisis in International Copyright, The Protocol Regarding Developing Countries, J. BUS. L. 26 (Jan.-Apr. 1969).
39. Irwin A. Olian, International Copyright and the Needs of Developing Countries: The Awakening at Stockholm and Paris, 7 CORNELL INT’ L L. J. 81 (1974)
40. Nora Maija Tocups, The Development of Special Provisions in International Copyright Law for the Benefit of Developing Countries, 29 J. COPYRIGHT SOC’ Y 402 (1982)
41. Barbara A. Ringer, The Role of the United States in International Copyright–Past, Present, and Future, 56 GEO. L. J. 1050 (1968).
42. Richard H. Steinberg, In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO, 56 INT’ L ORG. 339 (2002)
43. Ruth L. Okediji, Rules of Power in an Age of Law: Process Opportunism and TRIPS Dispute Settlement, in H ANDBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE: ECONOMIC AND LEGAL ANALYS I S OF LAWS AND INST ITUT IONS (E. Kwan Choi & J. Hartigan eds., 2004).
44. Upper Volta, Denunciation of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 5 COPYRIGHT 235 (1969).
45. Ruth L. Okediji, The Intern ational Relations of Intellectual Property: Narratives of Developing Country Participation in the Global Intellectual Property System, 7 SINGAPORE J. I NT.’ L COMP. L. 315, 335–36 (2003).
46. Revision of the Berne Convention, Records of the Paris Conference 34 (1971).
47. Records of the Conference for the Revision of the Universal Copyright Convention, UNESCO 261 (1973).
48. Ndene Ndiaye, The Berne Convention and Developing Countries, 11 COLUMVLA J.L. & ARTS 47 (1986).
49. Hanne Bak Pedersen, Access to ARV’s: Procurement, Logistics, Infrastructure (Dec. 2003), available at http://www.who.int/medicines/.
50. Sothi Rachagan, Copyri ght in Education – Reclaiming the Public Domain, presentation at Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue, Workshop on Global Access to Essential Learning Tools (New York, 5 Apr. 2004).
51. Daniel J. Gervais, The Internationalization of Intellectual Property: New Challenges from the Very Old and the Very New, 12 FORDHAM I NT E L L. PROP.MEDIA & E NT. L.J. 929-942, fn. 70 (2002).
52. Carlos Correa, TRIPS and Access to Drugs: Towards a Solution for Countries without Manufacturing Capacity?, 17 EMORY INT’ L L. REV. 389 (2003).
53. J.H. R EICHMAN WITH CATHERINE HASENZAHL, NON-VOLUNTARY LI CENSING OF PATENTED INVENTIONS: HI STORICAL PERSPECTIVE, LEGAL FRAMEWORK UNDER TRIPS, AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE PRACTICE IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES (UNCTAD/ICTSD 2002).
54. G.H.C. BODENHAUSEN, GUIDE TO THE APPLI CATION OF THE PARI S CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY 67–71 (1968).
55. Brett Frischmann & Dan Moylan, The Evolving Common Law Doctrine of Copyright Misuse: A Unified Theory and Its Application to Software, 15 BERKELEY T ECH. L.J. 865 (2000).
56. Troy Paredes, Comment, Copyright Misuse and Tying: Will Courts Stop Misusing Misuse?, 9 HI GH TECH. L.J. 271, 277 (1994).
57. Mark A. Lemley, Beyond Preemption: The Law and Policy of Intellectual Property Licensing, 87 CAL. L. REV. 111, 152 (1999)
58. Hanns Ullrich, Expansionist Intellectual Property Protection and Reductionist Competition Rules: A TRIPS Perspective [this volume]
59. Joseph Drexl, The Critical Role of Competition Law in Preserving Public Goods in Conflict with Intellectual Property Rights [this volume]
60. Mark D. Janis, “Minimal” Standards for the Patent-Related Antitrust Law Under TRIPS [this volume].
61. Jane C. Ginsburg, Toward Supranational Copyright Law? The WTO Panel Decision and the “Three Step Test” for Copyright Exceptions, REVUE I NT’ L DU D ROIT D’A UTEUR 3 (Jan. 2001)
62. Ruth Okediji, Toward an International Fair Use Standard, 39 COLUM. J. T RANSNAT’ L L. 75 (2000).
63. Paul Edward Geller, International Copyright: An Introduction, in INTERNAT IONAL COPYRIGHT LAW AND PRACTICE (Paul Edward Geller & Melville B. Nimmer eds., 1998)
64. DANIEL GERVAIS, THE TRIPS AGREEMENT: A DRAFTING HI STORY AND ANALYS IS, 45–46, 89–90 (1998).
65. Okediji, International Fair Use, above n. 116
66. Okediji, Copyright and Public Welfare, above n. 28.
67. Carlos Correa, Review of the Trips Agreement: Fostering the Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries, available at http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/foster.htm.
68. Julie Cohen, United States Implementation of the WIPO Copyright Treaty: Will Fair Use Survive?, 21 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 236 (1999).
69. Ruth L. Okediji, Development in the Information Age: Issues in the Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights, Computer Software, and E-Commerce, UNCTAD-ICTSD Intel lec tua l Pr op er ty R ights & Sustai n abl e Develop me n t S er ies Di scussion Pap er (De c. 2003), av ai la ble a t http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/docs/Okediji_ECommerce.Dec03.pdf.
70. Peter Gerhart, Distributive Values and Institutional Design in the Provision of Global Public Goods [this volume].
71. David Lange, Reimagining the Public Domain, 66 LAW &CONTEMP. PROBS. 463 (2003).
72. Pamela Samuelson, Mapping the Digital Public Domain: Threats and Opportunities, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 147 (2003)
73. Jessica Litman, The Public Domain, 39 EMORY L.J. 965 (1990).
74. A.A. Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 618 F.2d 972 (2d Cir. 1980).
75. BERNARD C. DIETZ, COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION PRACTICE x 28:16 (2d ed. 2003).
76. U.S. Copyright Office Circular 34, Names, Titles, Short Phrases not Copyrightable, available at http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ34.pdf.
77. U.S. Copyright Office, Factsheet FL 122, Recipes, available at http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl122.pdf.
78. Pamela Samuelson, Why the Anticircumvention Provisions Should Be Revised, 14 B ERK ELEY T ECH. L.J. 519 (1999)
79. Jane C. Ginsburg, Copyright Legislation for the Digital Millenium, 23 COLUM.-VLA J.L. & A RTS 137 (1999)
80. Daniel C. Higgs, Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. & Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Skylink Technologies, Inc.: The DMCA and Durable Goods Aftermarkets, 19 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 5, 82 (2004).
81. Okediji, Back to Bilateralism, above n. 43
82. Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com, US Exports DMCA i n Trad e Tr eaty, at http:/news.zdnet.co.uk/business/0,39020645,2137659,00.htm
83. Laura N. Gasaway, Values Conflict in the Digital Environment: Librarians Versus Copyright Holders, 24 Colum.-VLA J.L. & Arts 115, 118 (2000).
84. Raquel Xalabarder, Copyright and Digital Distance Education: The Use of Pre-Existing Works in Distance Education Through the Internet, 26 COLUM. VLA J.L. & ARTS 101, 108 (2003).
85. Kristine H. Hutchinson, Note, The Teach Act: Copyright Law and Online Education, 78 N.Y.U. L. REV. 2204 (2003).
86. Pamela Samuelson, Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Historical Perspective, 10 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 319, 238 (2003).
87. Gerhard Schricker, “Farewell to the Level of Creativity” in German Copyright Law?, 26 INT. REV. IND. PROP. & COPYR I GHT L. 41 (1995).
88. Ruth Okediji, TRIPS Dispute Settlement and the Sources of (International) Copyright Law, 49 J. C OPYRIGHT SOC’ Y 585 (2001).
89. Carsten Fink & Charles J. Kenny, W(h)ither the Digital Divide?, 5(6) INFO 1, 17 (Jan. 2003), available at http://www.developmentgateway. org/download/181562/W_h_ither_ DD_Jan_.pdf.
90. Trotter Hardy, Property (and Copyright) in Cyberspace, 1996 U. CHI. LEGAL F. 217, 220–28 (1996).
91. VLADIMIR F. WERTSMAN, THE LI BRARIAN’ S COMPANION 16 (2nd) (1996).
92. WORLD BANK, BUILDING INST ITUT IONS FOR MARKETS: WORLD DEVELOPMENT REPORT (2002).
93. Sisule F. Musungu & Graham Dutfield, Multila t era l Agre ements a n d a TR IPS- Plus Worl d: The W orl d Inte lle ctual Property Organisation (2003), av ai la ble at http://www.geneva.quno.info/pdf/WIPO(A4)final0304.pdf.
94. Dinwoodie, The New International Intellectual Property Law System, above n. 15.
95. Ruth L. Okediji, The Institutions of Intellectual Property: New Trends in an Old Debate, 98th ASIL Proc. (forthcoming 2004).
96. Joost Pauwellyn, WTO Dispute Settlement: Of Sovereign Interests, Private Rights and Public Goods [this volume].
97. John Harwood, Competitive Edge of U.S. is at Stake in the R&D Arena, WALL S T. J. EUR., 17 Mar. 2004.
98. OECD, ICT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCE FROM OECD COUNTR I E S, INDUSTRI E S AND FI RMS (2003)
99. OECD, S E I Z ING THE B ENE FI TS OF ICT IN A D I GITAL E CONOMY (2003), above n. 1.
100. Adelle Blackett, Global Governance, Legal Pluralism and the Decentered State: A Labor Law Critique of Codes of Corporate Conduct, 8 IND. J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD. 401, 441 (2001).
101. Douglass North, Economic Performance Through Time, 84 AMERICAN ECON. REV. 359 (1994)
102. Tade O. Okediji, The Efficacy of Institutions and Economic Growth: A Review Article, Working Paper (2004).
103. Agreement Between the World Intellectual Property Organization and the World Trade Organization (22 Dec. 1995), available at http://www.wto.org/english/tr atop_e/trips_e/wtowip_e.htm.
104. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enter., 471 U.S. 539, 558 (1985).
105. Robert A. Kreiss, Accessibility and Commercialization in Copyright Theory, 43 UCLA L. R EV. 1, 4–5 (1995);