Parcellation of left parietal tool representations by functional connectivity

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 131-143

  Garcea, Frank E ^a   Mahon, Bradford Z ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Apraxia; FMRI; Functional connectivity; Manipulable objects; Parietal cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL CORTEX; PREMOTOR CORTEX; SUPERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; VISUAL STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOL USE; VISION;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NERVE NET; PARIETAL LOBE; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84902980250     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.018     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Almeida J., Mahon B.Z., Nakayama K., Caramazza A. Unconscious procecessing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:15214-15218.
2. Almeida J., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychological Science 2010, 21:772-778.
3. Almeida J., Fintzi A.R., Mahon B.Z. Tool manipulation knowledge is retrieved by way of the ventral visual object processing pathway. Cortex 2013, 49:2334-2344.
4. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron 2002, 34:149-159.
5. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. fMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:991-1001.
6. Bedny M., Caramazza A., Pascual-Leone A., Saxe R. Typical neural representations of action verbs develops without vision. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 22:286-293.
7. Binder J.R., Desai R.H., Graves W.W., Conant L.L. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19:2767-2796.
8. Binkofski F., Buccino G., Posse S., Seitz R.J., Rizzolatti G., Freund H.-J. A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: Evidence from an fMRI-study. European Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 11:3276-3286.
9. Binkofski F., Buccino G., Stephan K.M., Rizzolatti G., Seitz R.J., Freund H.-J. A parieto-premotor network for object manipulation: Evidence from neuroimaging. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 128:210-213.
10. Binkofski F., Buxbaum L.J. Two action systems in the human brain. Brain and Language 2013, 127:222-229.
11. Borra E., Belmalih A., Calzavara R., Gerbella M., Murata A., Rozzi S., Luppino G. Cortical connections of the macaque anterior intraparietal (AIP) area. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:1094-1111.
12. Borra E., Ichinohe N., Sato T., Tanifuji M., Rockland K.S. Cortical connections to area TE in monkey: Hybrid modular and distributed organization. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:257-270.
13. Brodmann K. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Großhirnrinde 1909, Barth, Leipzig.
14. Buxbaum L.J., Veramonti T., Schwartz M.F. Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing "what for" but not "how". Neurocase 2000, 6:83-97.
15. Buxbaum L.J., Saffran E.M. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language 2002, 82:179-199.
16. Cabeza R., Ciaramelli E., Olson I.R., Moscovitch M. The parietal cortex and episodic memory: An attentional account. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:613-625.
17. Campanella F., D'Agostini S., Skrap M., Shallice T. Naming manipulable objects: Anatomy of a category specific effect in left temporal tumours. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1583-1597.
18. Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Scratching beneath the surface: New insights into the functional properties of the lateral occipital área and parahippocampal place area. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:8248-8258.
19. Cantlon J.F. Math, monkeys, and the developing brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America 2013, 109:10725-10732.
20. Cantlon J.F., Libertus M.E., Pinel P., Dehaene S., Brannon E.M., Pelphrey K.P. The neural development of an abstract concept of number. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:2217-2229.
21. Capitani E., Laiacona M., Mahon B., Caramazza A. What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20:213-261.
22. Caspers S., Geyer S., Schleicher A., Mohlberg H., Amunts K., Zilles K. The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability. NeuroImage 2006, 33:430-448.
23. Caspers S., Eickhoff S.B., Rick T., von Kapri A., Kuhlen T., Huang R., Shah N.J., Zilles K. Probabilistic fibre tract analysis of cytoarchitectonically defined human inferior parietal lobule areas reveals similarities to macaques. NeuroImage 2011, 58:362-380.
24. Caspers S., Schleicher A., Bacha-Trams M., Palomero-Gallagher N., Amunts K., Zilles K. Organization of human inferior parietal lobule based on receptor architectonics. Cerebral Cortex 2013, 53:615-628.
25. Cavina-Pratesi C., Goodale M.A., Culham J.C. FMRI Reveals a dissociation between grasping and perceiving the size of real 3D objects. PLoS One 2007, 2:1-14.
26. Chao L.L., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about object. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:913-919.
27. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 2000, 12:478-484.
28. Corbetta M. Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95:831-838.
29. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
30. Creem-Regehr S.H., Lee J.N. Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special?. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 22:457-469.
31. Cubelli R., Marchetti C., Boscolo G., Della Salla S. Cognition in action: Testing a model of limb apraxia. Brain and Cognition 2000, 44:144-165.
32. Culham J.C., Danckert S.L., DeSouza J.F.X., Gati J.S., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral brain areas. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 153:180-189.
33. Desmurget M., Sirigu A. A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:411-419.
34. Durand J.-B., Nelissen K., Joly O., Wardak C., Todd J.T., et al. Anterior regions of monkey parietal cortex process visual 3D shape. Neuron 2007, 55:493-505.
35. Fang F., He S. Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1380-1385.
36. Gainotti G. What the locus of brain lesions tells us about the nature of the cognitive defect underlying category-specific disorders: A review. Cortex 2000, 36:539-559.
37. Gainotti G. Neuroanatomical correlates of category-specific semantic disorders: A critical survey. Memory 1995, 3:247-264.
38. Garcea F.E., Dombovy M., Mahon B.Z. Preserved tool knowledge in the context of impaired action knowledge: Implications for models of semantic memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7:1-18.
39. Geschwind N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Part II. Brain 1965, 8:585-644.
40. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychology 2009, 47:1449-1459.
41. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation of familiar tools. NeuroImage 1997, 6:231-236.
42. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Science 2006, 10:14-23.
43. Gotts, S.J., Jo, H.J., Wallace, G.L., Saad, Z.S., Cox, R.W., and Martin, A. (in press). Two distinct forms of functional lateralization in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United State of America. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302581110.
44. Gotts S.J., Saad Z.S., Jo H.J., Wallace G.L., Cox R.W., Martin A. The perils of global signal regression for group comparisons: A case study of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7:1-20.
45. He B.J., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Epstein A., Shulman G.L., Corbetta M. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 2007, 53:905-918.
46. Hickok G. The functional neuroanatomy of language. Physics of Life Reviews 2009, 6:121-143.
47. Hickok G., Poeppel D. Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 2004, 92:67-99.
48. Jeannerod M., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G., Sakata H. Grasping objects: The cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neuroscience 1995, 18:314-320.
49. Jeannerod M., Decety J., Michel F. Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:369-380.
50. Johnson-Frey S. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:71-78.
51. Johnson-Frey S., Newman-Norlund R., Grafton S.T. A distributed left hemipshere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:681-695.
52. Karnath H.O., Perenin M.T. Cortical control of visually guided reaching: Evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:1561-1569.
53. Konen C.S., Kleiser R., Wittsack H.-J., Bremmer F., Seitz R.J. The encoding of saccadic eye movements within human posterior parietal cortex. NeuroImage 2004, 22:304-314.
54. Konen C.S., Kastner S. Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:224-231.
55. Konen C.S., Mruczek R.E.B., Montoya J.L., Kastner S. Functional organization of human posterior parietal cortex: Grasping- and reaching-related activations relative to topographically organized cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2013, 109:2897-2908.
56. Leiguarda R.C., Marsden C.D. Limb apraxias: Higher-order disorders of sensorimotor integration. Brain 2000, 123:860-879.
57. Liepmann, H. (1905). The left hemisphere and action. (Translation from Munch. Med. Wschr. 48-49). (Translations from Liepmann's essays on apraxia. In Research bulletin (Vol. 506). London, Ont.: Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario; 1980).
58. Lewis J. Cortical networks related to human use of tools. The Neuroscientist 2006, 12:211-231.
59. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22:480-494.
60. Mahon B.Z., Milleville S., Negri G.A.L., Rumiati R.I., Caramazza A., Martin A. Action-related properties of objects shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron 2007, 55:507-520.
61. Mahon B.Z., Kumar N., Almeida J. Spatial frequency tuning reveals interactions between the dorsal and ventral visual systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25:862-871.
62. Mars R.B., Jbabdi S., Sallet J., O'Reilly J.X., Croxson P.L., et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging tractography-based parcellation of the human parietal cortex and comparison with human and macaque resting-state functional connectivity. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:4087-4100.
63. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 1996, 379:649-653.
64. Martin A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58:25-45.
65. Matelli M., Luppino G., Rizzolatti G. Patterns of cytochrome oxidase activity in the frontal agranular cortex of macaque monkey. Behavioral Brain Research 1985, 18:125-137.
66. Matelli M., Luppino G., Rizzolatti G. Architecture of superior and mesial area 6 and of the adjacent cingulate cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1991, 311:445-462.
67. Merigan W.H., Maunsell J.H. How parallel are the primate visual pathways?. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1993, 16:369-402.
68. Miceli G., Fouch E., Capasso R., Shelton J.R., Tomaiuolo F., Caramazza A. The dissociation of color from form and function knowledge. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:662-667.
69. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:774-785.
70. Mirkin B. Clustering for data mining: A data recovery approach 2005, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
71. Negri G.A.L., Rumiati R.I., Zadini A., Ukmar M., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2007, 24:795-816.
72. Nelsen S.M., Cohen A.L., Power J.D., Wig G.S., Miezin F.M., et al. A parcellation scheme for human left lateral parietal cortex. Neuron 2010, 67:156-170.
73. Noppeney U., Price C.J., Penny W.D., Friston K.J. Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:437-445.
74. Ochipa C., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use. Annals of Neurology 1989, 25:190-193.
75. Orban G.A., Claeys K., Nelissen K., Smans R., Sunaert S., et al. Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2647-2667.
76. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Le Gall D. Re-examining the gesture engram hypothesis: New perspectives on apraxia of tool use. Neuropsychologia 2009, 49:299-312.
77. Pandya D.N., Kuypers H.G.J.M. Cortico-cortical connections in the rhesus monkey. Brain Research 1969, 13:13-36.
78. Pandya D.N., Seltzer B. Intrinsic connections and architectonics of posterior parietal cortex in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1982, 204:196-210.
79. Passingham R.E. Premotor cortex: Sensory cues and movement. Behavioural Brain Research 1985, 18:175-185.
80. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:377-401.
81. Pisella L., Gréa H., Tilikete C., Vighetto A., Desmurget M., et al. An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: Toward reinterpretation of optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:729-736.
82. Rizzolatti G., Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 153:146-157.
83. Rogers T.T., Hocking J., Mechelli A., Patterson K., Price C. Fusiform activation to animals is driven by the process, not the stimulus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:434-445.
84. Rumiati R.I., Zanini S., Vorano L., Shallice T. A form of ideational apraxia as a selective deficit of contention scheduling. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2001, 18:617-642.
85. Rumiati R.I., Weiss P.H., Shallice T., Ottoboni G., Noth J., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects. NeuroImage 2004, 21:1224-1231.
86. Rothi L.J.G., Ochipa C., Heilman K.M. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991, 8:443-458.
87. Rozzi S., Calzavara R., Belmalih A., Borra E., Gregoriou G.G., Matelli M., Luppino G. Cortical connections of the inferior parietal cortical convexity of the macaque monkey. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:1389-1417.
88. Ruschel, M., Knösche, T. R., Friederici, A. D., Turner, R., Geyer, S., and Anwander, A. (in press). Connectivity architecture and subdivision of the human inferior parietal cortex revealed by diffusion MRI. Cerebral Cortex, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht098.
89. Rushworth M.F.S., Behrens T.E.J., Johansen-Berg H. Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:1418-1430.
90. Saad Z.S., Reynolds R.C., Jo H.J., Gotts S.J., Chen G., Martin A., Cox R.W. Correcting brain-wide correlation differences in resting-state fMRI. Brain Connectivity, 2013, 3:339-352.
91. Schwarzbach J. A simple framework (ASF) for behavioral and neuroimaging experiments based on psychophysics toolbox for MATLAB. Behavioral Research 2011, 43:1194-1201.
92. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain 1988, Thieme, New York.
93. Thiebaut de Schotten M., Urbanski M., Duffau H., Volle E., Lévy R., Dubois B., Bartolomeo P. Direct evidence for a parietal-frontal pathway subserving spatial awareness in humans. Science 2005, 309:2226-2228.
94. Thiebaut de Schotten M., Dell'Acqua F., Forkel S.J., Simmons A., Vergani F., et al. A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14:1245-1246.
95. Vogt C., Vogt O. Ergebnisse unserer Hirnforschung. Vierte mitteilung: Die physiologische bedeutung der architektonischen rin-denreizungen. Journal f. Psychologie und Neurologie 1919, 25:279-461.
96. von Economo C. The cytoarchitectonics of the human cerebral cortex 1929, Oxford University Press, London, (186 pp).
97. von Economo K., Koskinas G. Die Cytoarchitektonik der Hirnrinde des erwachsenen Menschen 1925, Springer, Wien.
98. Zhang Y., Fan L., Zhang Y., Wang J., Zhu M., et al. Connectivity-based parcellation of the human posteromedial cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 2014, 24:719-727.
99. Zhong Y., Rockland K.S. Inferior parietal lobule projections to anterior inferotemporal cortex (Area TE) in macaque monkey. Cerebral Cortex 2003, 13:527-540.