Tool manipulation knowledge is retrieved by way of the ventral visual object processing pathway

Cortex

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2334-2344

  Almeida, Jorge ^a   Fintzi, Anat R ^b   Mahon, Bradford Z ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Dorsal stream; FMRI; Koniocellular pathway; Object recognition; Parvocellular pathway; Subcortical pathways; Ventral stream; Visual pathways

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; KNOWLEDGE; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NERVE POTENTIAL; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PARIETAL CORTEX; STIMULATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

DORSAL STREAM; FMRI; KONIOCELLULAR PATHWAY; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PARVOCELLULAR PATHWAY; SUBCORTICAL PATHWAYS; VENTRAL STREAM; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NERVE NET; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884820142     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Almeida J., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychological Science 2010, 21:772-778.
2. Almeida J., Mahon B.Z., Nakayama K., Caramazza A. Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2008, 105:5214-5218.
3. Almeida J., Mahon B.Z., Zapater-Raberov V., Dziuba A., Cabaço T., Marques J.F., et al. Grasping with the eyes: The role of elongation in visual manipulable object recognition. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 2013, in press.
4. Arbib M. From grasp to language: Embodied concepts and the challenge of abstraction. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2008, 102(1-3):4-20.
5. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., van Rijn H. The CELEX Lexical Database [CD-ROM] 1993, University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
6. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron 2002, 34:149-159.
7. Binkofski F., Buxbaum L.J. Two action systems in the human brain. Brain and Language 2013, in press. 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.007.
8. Binkofski F., Reetz K., Blangero A. Tactile agnosia and tactile apraxia: Crosstalk between the action and perception streams in AIP. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:2001-2002.
9. Boronat C.B., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B., Tang K., Saffran E.M., Kimberg D.Y., et al. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 23(2-3):361-373.
10. Borra E., Belmalih A., Calzavara R., Gerbella M., Murata A., Rozzi S., et al. Cortical connections of the macaque anterior intraparietal (AIP) area. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:1094-1111.
11. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
12. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., Grossman M., Coslett H.B. Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: Evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex 2007, 43(3):411-423.
13. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., Tang K., Detre J.M. Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI. Brain Research 2006, 1117(1):175-185.
14. Buxbaum L.J., Saffran E.M. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language 2002, 82(2):179-199.
15. Canessa N., Borgo F., Cappa S.F., Perani D., Falini A., Buccino G., et al. The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:740-751.
16. Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:713-731.
17. Casagrande V.A. A third parallel visual pathway to primate area V1. Trends in Neurosciences 1994, 17:305-310.
18. Cavanagh P., Adelson E.H., Heard P. Vision with equiluminant colour contrast: 2. A large scale technique and observations. Perception 1992, 21:219-226.
19. Cavanagh P., Anstis S.M., MacLeod D.I.A. Equiluminance: Spatial and temporal factors and the contribution of blue-sensitive cones. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1987, 4:1428-1438.
20. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage 2000, 12:478-484.
21. Chao L.L., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about object. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:913-919.
22. Coltheart M. The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1981, 33A:497-505.
23. Creem-Regehr S.H., Lee J.N. Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special?. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 22(3):457-469.
24. Culham J.C., Danckert S.L., DeSouza J.F., Gati J.S., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 153:180-189.
25. Dacey D.M. Parallel pathways for spectral coding in primate retina. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:743-775.
26. Damasio H., Tranel D., Grabowski T., Adolphs R., Damasio A. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition 2004, 92(1-2):179-229.
27. Das A., Huxlin K.R. New approaches to visual rehabilitation for cortical blindness: Outcomes and putative mechanisms. Neuroscientist 2010, 16(4):374-387.
28. Fagg A.H., Arbib M.A. Modeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping. Neural Networks 1998, 11:1277-1303.
29. Fang F., He S. Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(10):1380-1385.
30. Ferrera V.P., Nealey T.A., Maunsell J.H. Mixed parvocellular and magnocellular geniculate signals in visual area V4. Nature 1992, 27:756-761.
31. Frey S.H. What puts the how in where? Tool use and the divided visual streams hypothesis. Cortex 2007, 43(3):368-375.
32. Gallese V., Lakoff G. The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22:455-479.
33. Garcea F.E., Dombovy M., Mahon B.Z. Preserved tool knowledge in the context of impaired action knowledge: Implications for models of semantic memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7:1-18.
34. Garcea F.E., Mahon B.Z. What is in a tool concept? Dissociating manipulation knowledge from function knowledge. Memory and Cognition 2012, 40:1303-1313.
35. Goldenberg G. Apraxia. Handbook of Clinical Neurology 2008, 323-338. Elsevier, Edinburgh. 3rd ed. G. Goldenberg, B. Miller (Eds.).
36. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(6):1449-1459.
37. Goldenberg G., Hagmann S. Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36(7):581-589.
38. Goldenberg G., Spatt J. The neural basis of tool use. Brain 2009, 132(6):1645-1655.
39. Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S., Keillor J.M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32(10):1159-1178.
40. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 1992, 15:20-25.
41. Grafton S.T. The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: Recent developments. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204(4):475-491.
42. Grèzes J., Tucker M., Armony J.L., Ellis R., Passingham R.E. Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 17:2735-2740.
43. Grill-Spector K., Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research 2001, 41(10-11):1409-1422.
44. Helbig H.B., Graf M., Kiefer M. The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 174(2):221-228.
45. Helbig H.B., Steinwender J., Graf M., Kiefer M. Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 200(3-4):251-258.
46. Hendry S.H.C., Reid R.C. The koniocellular pathway in primate vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:127-153.
47. Himmelbach M., Boehme R., Karnath H.O. 20 years later: A second look on DF's motor behaviour. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(1):139-144.
48. Ishibashi R., Lambon Ralph M.A., Saito S., Pobric G. Different roles of lateral anterior temporal and inferior parietal lobule in coding function and manipulation tool knowledge: Evidence from an rTMS study. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:1128-1135.
49. Jax S., Buxbaum L.J. Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. Cognition 2010, 115(2):350-355.
50. Jeannerod M., Decety J., Michel F. Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32(4):369-380.
51. Johnson-Frey S. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:71-78.
52. Karnath H.-O., Rüter J., Mandler A., Himmelbach M. The anatomy of object recognition-Visual form agnosia caused by medial occipitotemporal stroke. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:5854-5862.
53. Kellenbach M.L., Brett M., Patterson K. Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:20-46.
54. Kveraga K., Boshyan J., Bar M. Magnocellular projections as the trigger of top-down facilitation in recognition. The Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:13232-13240.
55. Lee J., Stromeyer C.F. Contribution of human short-wave cones to luminance and motion detection. Journal of Physiology 1989, 413:563-593.
56. Livingstone M., Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 1988, 240:740-749.
57. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22:480-494.
58. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A.A. Critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis & a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology - Paris 2008, 102:59-70.
59. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Concepts & categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:27-51.
60. Mahon B., Kumar N., Almeida J. Spatial frequency tuning reveals visuomotor interactions between the dorsal and ventral visual systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25(6):862-871.
61. Mahon B.Z., Milleville S., Negri G.A.L., Rumiati R.I., Caramazza A., Martin A. Action-related properties of objects shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron 2007, 55:507-520.
62. Martin A., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Category specificity and the brain: The sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. The New Cognitive Neurosciences 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
63. Merigan W.H., Maunsell J.H.R. How parallel are the primate visual pathways?. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1993, 16:369-402.
64. Moreaud O., Charnallet A., Pellat J. Identification without manipulation: A study of the relations between object use and semantic memory. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36(12):1295-1301.
65. Moreland J.D. Spectral sensitivity measured by motion photometry. Colour Deficiencies 1982, vol. VI:61-66. Junk, The Hague.
66. Nelissen K., Vanduffell W. Grasping-related functional magnetic resonance imaging brain responses in the macaque monkey. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(22):8220-8229.
67. Negri G.A.L., Rumiati R.I., Zadini A., Ukmar M., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2007, 24:795-816.
68. Noppeney U., Price C.J., Penny W.D., Friston K.J. Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:437-445.
69. Pelgrims B., Olivier E., Andres M. Dissociation between manipulation and conceptual knowledge of object use in supramarginalis gyrus. Human Brain Mapping 2011, 32:1802-1810.
70. Perenin M., Vighetto A. Optic ataxia: A specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain 1988, 111(3):643-674.
71. Pisella L., Binkofski F., Lasek K., Rossetti Y. No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: Multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(13):2734-2748.
72. Pitzalis S., Galletti C., Huang R.S., Patria F., Committeri G., Galati G., et al. Wide-field retinotopy defines human cortical visual area v6. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(30):7962-7973.
73. Pobric G., Jeffries E., Lambon Ralph A. Amodal semantic representations depend on both anterior temporal lobes: Evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1336-1342.
74. Randerath J., Goldenberg G., Spijkers W., Li Y., Hermsdörfer J. Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use. NeuroImage 2010, 53(1):171-180.
75. Randerath J., Martin K.R., Frey S.H. Are tool properties always processed automatically? The role of tool use context and task complexity. Cortex 2013, 49(6):1679-1693.
76. Rizzolatti G., Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 153(2):146-157.
77. Rumiati R.I., Weiss P.H., Shallice T., Ottoboni G., Noth J., Zilles K., et al. The neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects. NeuroImage 2004, 21:1224-1231.
78. Rushworth M., Behrens T., Johansen-Berg H. Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16(10):1418-1430.
79. Sakuraba S., Sakai S., Yamanaka M., Yokosawa K., Hirayama K. Does the human dorsal stream really process a category for tools?. Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32(11):3949-3953.
80. Schenk T., McIntosh R.D. Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action?. Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 1(1):52-62.
81. Schwarzbach J. A simple framework (ASF) for behavioral and neuroimaging experiments based on the psychophysics toolbox for MATLAB. Behavior Research Methods 2011, 43(4):1194-1201.
82. Simon O., Mangin J.F., Cohen L., Le Bihan D., Deahene S. Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron 2002, 33(3):475-487.
83. Sincich L.C., Park K.F., Wohlgemuth M.J., Horton J.C. Bypassing V1: A direct geniculate input to area MT. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7(10):1123-1128.
84. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.R., Poncet M. The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. Brain 1991, 114:2555-2573.
85. Sunderland A., Wilkins L., Dineen R., Dawson S.E. Tool-use and the left hemisphere: What is lost in ideomotor apraxia?. Brain and Cognition 2013, 81(2):183-192.
86. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain 1988, Thieme, New York.
87. Tootell R.B.H., Reppas J.B., Kwong K.K., Malach R., Born R.T., Brady T.J., et al. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:3215-3230.
88. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
89. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Analysis of Visual Behavior 1982, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA. D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.).
90. Vakalopoulos C. A theory of blindsight-The anatomy of the unconscious: A proposal for the koniocellular projections and intralaminar thalamus. Medical Hypotheses 2005, 65(6):1183-1190.
91. Vingerhoets G. Knowing about tools: Neural correlates of tool familiarity and experience. NeuroImage 2008, 40:1380-1391.
92. Vingerhoets G., Acke F., Vandemaele P., Achten E. Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: Effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements. NeuroImage 2009, 47:1832-1843.
93. Wald G. The receptors of human color vision. Science 1964, 145(3636):1007-1016.
94. Wu W.C. Visual attention, conceptual content, and doing it right. Mind 2008, 117:1003-1033.
95. Zhong Y.-M., Rockland K.S. Inferior parietal lobule projections to anterior inferiortemporal cortex (area TE) in Macaque monkey. Cerebral Cortex 2003, 13:527-540.