-
1
-
-
0001029742
-
The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions
-
Babakus, E., Ferguson, J. C. E., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1987). The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(2), 222-228.
-
(1987)
Journal of Marketing Research
, vol.24
, Issue.2
, pp. 222-228
-
-
Babakus, E.1
Ferguson, J.C.E.2
Jöreskog, K.G.3
-
2
-
-
84857398252
-
An SPSS R-Menu for ordinal factor analysis
-
Basto, M., & Pereira, J. M. (2012). An SPSS R-Menu for ordinal factor analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 46(4), 1-29.
-
(2012)
Journal of Statistical Software
, vol.46
, Issue.4
, pp. 1-29
-
-
Basto, M.1
Pereira, J.M.2
-
3
-
-
84877146095
-
Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research
-
Retrieved from
-
Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G. J., & Esquivel, S. L. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(6), 1-13. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v18n6.pdf
-
(2013)
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation
, vol.18
, Issue.6
, pp. 1-13
-
-
Beavers, A.S.1
Lounsbury, J.W.2
Richards, J.K.3
Huck, S.W.4
Skolits, G.J.5
Esquivel, S.L.6
-
4
-
-
58149373040
-
Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization
-
doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.467
-
Bernstein, I. H., & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 467-477. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.467
-
(1989)
Psychological Bulletin
, vol.105
, Issue.3
, pp. 467-477
-
-
Bernstein, I.H.1
Teng, G.2
-
5
-
-
84880609979
-
Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis
-
Retrieved from
-
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf
-
(2005)
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation
, vol.10
, Issue.7
, pp. 1-9
-
-
Costello, A.B.1
Osborne, J.W.2
-
6
-
-
84886299055
-
Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: Using the SPSS R-Menu v2.0 to make more judicious estimations
-
Retrieved from
-
Courtney, M. G. R. (2013). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: Using the SPSS R-Menu v2.0 to make more judicious estimations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(8), 1-14. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v18n8.pdf
-
(2013)
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation
, vol.18
, Issue.8
, pp. 1-14
-
-
Courtney, M.G.R.1
-
7
-
-
0000714518
-
Note: Inter-rater reliabiliy of scree test and mean square ratio test of number of factors
-
doi:10.2466/pms.1979.49.1.223
-
Crawford, C. B., & Koopman, P. (1979). Note: Inter-rater reliabiliy of scree test and mean square ratio test of number of factors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49(1), 223-226. doi:10.2466/pms.1979.49.1.223
-
(1979)
Perceptual and Motor Skills
, vol.49
, Issue.1
, pp. 223-226
-
-
Crawford, C.B.1
Koopman, P.2
-
8
-
-
84877138276
-
Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher
-
Retrieved from
-
DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrilla, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20), 1-11. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v14n20.pdf
-
(2009)
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation
, vol.14
, Issue.20
, pp. 1-11
-
-
DiStefano, C.1
Zhu, M.2
Mindrilla, D.3
-
9
-
-
0039620968
-
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research
-
doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
-
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
-
(1999)
Psychological Methods
, vol.4
, Issue.3
, pp. 272-299
-
-
Fabrigar, L.R.1
Wegener, D.T.2
MacCallum, R.C.3
Strahan, E.J.4
-
10
-
-
84892456989
-
A new look at Horn's parallel analysis with ordinal variables
-
doi:10.1037/a0030005
-
Garrido, L. E., Abad, F. J., & Ponsoda, V. (2013). A new look at Horn's parallel analysis with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 18(4), 454-74. doi:10.1037/a0030005
-
(2013)
Psychological Methods
, vol.18
, Issue.4
, pp. 454-474
-
-
Garrido, L.E.1
Abad, F.J.2
Ponsoda, V.3
-
11
-
-
84894257976
-
On exploratory factor analysis: A review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use
-
doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.005
-
Gaskin, C. J., & Happell, B. (2013). On exploratory factor analysis: A review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use. International Journal of Nursing Studies. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.005
-
(2013)
International Journal of Nursing Studies.
-
-
Gaskin, C.J.1
Happell, B.2
-
12
-
-
58149208119
-
The development of the markers for the Big-Five factor structure
-
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of the markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
-
(1992)
Psychological Assessment
, vol.4
, pp. 26-42
-
-
Goldberg, L.R.1
-
13
-
-
72749123769
-
Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables
-
doi:10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y
-
Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2008). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 153-166. doi:10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y
-
(2008)
Quality & Quantity
, vol.44
, Issue.1
, pp. 153-166
-
-
Holgado-Tello, F.P.1
Chacón-Moscoso, S.2
Barbero-García, I.3
Vila-Abad, E.4
-
14
-
-
8644267207
-
A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis
-
doi:10.1007/BF02289447
-
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
-
(1965)
Psychometrika
, vol.30
, Issue.2
, pp. 179-185
-
-
Horn, J.L.1
-
15
-
-
38249036936
-
An empirical comparison of alternative methods for principal component extraction
-
doi:10.1016/0148-2963(84)90047-X
-
Hubbard, R., & Allen, S. J. (1987). An empirical comparison of alternative methods for principal component extraction. Journal of Business Research, 15(2), 173-190. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(84)90047-X
-
(1987)
Journal of Business Research
, vol.15
, Issue.2
, pp. 173-190
-
-
Hubbard, R.1
Allen, S.J.2
-
16
-
-
0010017776
-
Note on a criterion for the number of common factors
-
doi:10.1177/001316446902900303
-
Humphreys, L. G., & Ilgen, D. R. (1969). Note on a criterion for the number of common factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29(3), 571-578. doi:10.1177/001316446902900303
-
(1969)
Educational and Psychological Measurement
, vol.29
, Issue.3
, pp. 571-578
-
-
Humphreys, L.G.1
Ilgen, D.R.2
-
17
-
-
84871782260
-
IBM SPSS Statistics 21 for Windows
-
IBM Corp, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp
-
IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics 21 for Windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
-
(2012)
-
-
-
18
-
-
0033235256
-
Promin: A Method for Oblique Factor Rotation
-
doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_3
-
Lorenzo-Seva, U. (1999). Promin: A Method for Oblique Factor Rotation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(3), 347-365. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_3
-
(1999)
Multivariate Behavioral Research
, vol.34
, Issue.3
, pp. 347-365
-
-
Lorenzo-Seva, U.1
-
19
-
-
84902981786
-
How to report the percentage of explained common variance in exploratory factor analysis. Technical report
-
Tarragona. Retrieved from
-
Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). How to report the percentage of explained common variance in exploratory factor analysis. Technical report. Tarragona. Retrieved from http://psico.fcep.urv.cat/utilitats/factor/
-
(2013)
-
-
Lorenzo-Seva, U.1
-
20
-
-
33746742446
-
FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model
-
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 88-91.
-
(2006)
Behavior Research Methods
, vol.38
, Issue.1
, pp. 88-91
-
-
Lorenzo-Seva, U.1
Ferrando, P.J.2
-
21
-
-
2942611661
-
Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications
-
doi:10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
-
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. doi:10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
-
(1970)
Biometrika
, vol.57
, Issue.3
, pp. 519-530
-
-
Mardia, K.V.1
-
22
-
-
84877136779
-
How to factor-analyse your data right: Do's dont's, and how-to's
-
Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyse your data right: Do's dont's, and how-to's. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97-110.
-
(2010)
International Journal of Psychological Research
, vol.3
, Issue.1
, pp. 97-110
-
-
Matsunaga, M.1
-
23
-
-
0004105694
-
BILOG 3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic regression models
-
Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software
-
Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1990). BILOG 3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic regression models. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
-
(1990)
-
-
Mislevy, R.J.1
Bock, R.D.2
-
24
-
-
0000541399
-
Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient
-
Olsson, U. (1979a). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44(4), 443-460.
-
(1979)
Psychometrika
, vol.44
, Issue.4
, pp. 443-460
-
-
Olsson, U.1
-
25
-
-
84949160498
-
On the robustness of factor analysis against crude classification of the observations
-
doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_7
-
Olsson, U. (1979b). On the robustness of factor analysis against crude classification of the observations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(4), 485-500. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_7
-
(1979)
Multivariate Behavioral Research
, vol.14
, Issue.4
, pp. 485-500
-
-
Olsson, U.1
-
26
-
-
84877137641
-
Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: What it is and why it makes your analysis better
-
Retrieved from
-
Osborne, J. W., & Fitzpatrick, D. C. (2012). Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: What it is and why it makes your analysis better. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(15), 1-8. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v17n15.pdf
-
(2012)
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation
, vol.17
, Issue.15
, pp. 1-8
-
-
Osborne, J.W.1
Fitzpatrick, D.C.2
-
27
-
-
84863304598
-
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
-
R Core Team Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from doi:10.1037/a0025697
-
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org
-
(2013)
-
-
-
28
-
-
84866924945
-
Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure
-
doi:10.1037/a0025697
-
Ruscio, J., & Roche, B. (2012). Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 282-92. doi:10.1037/a0025697
-
(2012)
Psychological Assessment
, vol.24
, Issue.2
, pp. 282-292
-
-
Ruscio, J.1
Roche, B.2
-
29
-
-
79961215491
-
Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
-
doi:10.1177/0734282911406653
-
Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 304-321. doi:10.1177/0734282911406653
-
(2011)
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
, vol.29
, Issue.4
, pp. 304-321
-
-
Schmitt, T.A.1
-
30
-
-
0036011443
-
Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis
-
doi:10.1007/BF02294710
-
Shapiro, A., & Berge, J. M. F. (2002). Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis. Psychometrika, 67(1), 79-94. doi:10.1007/BF02294710
-
(2002)
Psychometrika
, vol.67
, Issue.1
, pp. 79-94
-
-
Shapiro, A.1
Berge, J.M.F.2
-
31
-
-
33845885130
-
Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: A comparison of imputation methods
-
doi:doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-57
-
Shrive, F. M., Stuart, H., Quan, H., & Ghali, W. A. (2006). Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: A comparison of imputation methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 57. doi:doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-57
-
(2006)
BMC Medical Research Methodology
, vol.57
-
-
Shrive, F.M.1
Stuart, H.2
Quan, H.3
Ghali, W.A.4
-
32
-
-
0003976359
-
Using multivariate statistics
-
(4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
-
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
-
(2001)
-
-
Tabachnick, B.G.1
Fidell, L.S.2
-
33
-
-
0000029178
-
A numerical approach to the approximate and the exact minimum rank of a covariance matrix
-
Ten Berge, J. M. F., & Kiers, A. L. (1991). A numerical approach to the approximate and the exact minimum rank of a covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 56(2), 309-315.
-
(1991)
Psychometrika
, vol.56
, Issue.2
, pp. 309-315
-
-
Ten Berge, J.M.F.1
Kiers, A.L.2
-
34
-
-
79958855301
-
Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis
-
doi:10.1037/a0023353
-
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-20. doi:10.1037/a0023353
-
(2011)
Psychological Methods
, vol.16
, Issue.2
, pp. 209-220
-
-
Timmerman, M.E.1
Lorenzo-Seva, U.2
-
35
-
-
32944479235
-
Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale's indicators: A comparison of estimators for ωh
-
doi:10.1177/0146621605278814
-
Zinbarg, R. E. (2006). Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale's indicators: A comparison of estimators for ωh. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(2), 121-144. doi:10.1177/0146621605278814
-
(2006)
Applied Psychological Measurement
, vol.30
, Issue.2
, pp. 121-144
-
-
Zinbarg, R.E.1
-
36
-
-
58149371334
-
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain
-
doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432.
-
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432-442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432.
-
(1986)
Psychological Bulletin
, vol.99
, Issue.3
, pp. 432-442
-
-
Zwick, W.R.1
Velicer, W.F.2
|