A calibration study of SAPS II with Norwegian intensive care registry data

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 701-708

  Haaland, A ^a   Lindemark, F ^a,b   Flaatten, H ^b,c   Kvale R ^b,c   Johansson, K A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c Norwegian Intensive Care Registry   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NORWAY; NORWEGIAN INTENSIVE CARE REGISTRY; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SIMPLIFIED ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY SCORE; STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIO; CRITICAL ILLNESS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PROGNOSIS; REGISTER; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CALIBRATION; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NORWAY; PROGNOSIS; REGISTRIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84902970641     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12327     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Flaatten H,. Prognostic scoring systems in the ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 1175-1176. (Pubitemid 44624294)
2. Minne L, Eslami S, de Keizer N, de Jonge E, de Rooij SE, Abu-Hanna A,. Effect of changes over time in the performance of a customized SAPS-II model on the quality of care assessment. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 40-46.
3. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE,. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-829. (Pubitemid 15250137)
4. Teres D, Lemeshow S, Avrunin JS, Pastides H,. Validation of the mortality prediction model for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 1987; 15: 208-213.
5. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F,. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993; 270: 2957-2963. (Pubitemid 24000804)
6. Barnato AE, Angus DC,. Value and role of intensive care unit outcome prediction models in end-of-life decision making. Crit Care Clin 2004; 20: 345-362, vii-viii. (Pubitemid 38748480)
7. Brinkman S, Bakhshi-Raiez F, Abu-Hanna A, de Jonge E, Bosman RJ, Peelen L, de Keizer NF,. External validation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV in Dutch intensive care units and comparison with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II. J Crit Care 2011; 26: e11-18.
8. Aegerter P, Boumendil A, Retbi A, Minvielle E, Dervaux B, Guidet B,. SAPS II revisited. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 416-423.
9. Moreno R, Morais P,. Outcome prediction in intensive care: results of a prospective, multicentre, Portuguese study. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23: 177-186. (Pubitemid 27110394)
10. Beck DH, Smith GB, Pappachan JV, Millar B,. External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 249-256. (Pubitemid 36384415)
11. Strand K, Flaatten H,. Severity scoring in the ICU: a review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52: 467-478. (Pubitemid 351392864)
12. Sakr Y, Krauss C, Amaral AC, Rea-Neto A, Specht M, Reinhart K, Marx G,. Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 798-803.
13. Poole D, Rossi C, Latronico N, Rossi G, Finazzi S, Bertolini G, GiViTi. Comparison between SAPS II and SAPS 3 in predicting hospital mortality in a cohort of 103 Italian ICUs. Is new always better? Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1280-1288.
14. Harrison DA, Brady AR, Parry GJ, Carpenter JR, Rowan K,. Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicenter cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1378-1388.
15. Le Gall JR, Neumann A, Hemery F, Bleriot JP, Fulgencio JP, Garrigues B, Gouzes C, Lepage E, Moine P, Villers D,. Mortality prediction using SAPS II: an update for French intensive care units. Crit Care 2005; 9: R645-652.
16. Reinikainen M, Mussalo P, Hovilehto S, Uusaro A, Varpula T, Kari A, Pettila V, Finnish Intensive Care C. Association of automated data collection and data completeness with outcomes of intensive care. A new customised model for outcome prediction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56: 1114-1122.
17. Strand K, Soreide E, Aardal S, Flaatten H,. A comparison of SAPS II and SAPS 3 in a Norwegian intensive care unit population. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 595-600.
18. Kohavi R,. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings IJCAI-95 1995: 1137-43.
19. Hanley J, McNeil B,. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36. (Pubitemid 12142173)
20. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr., A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 115: 92-106. (Pubitemid 12205725)
21. Brier GW,. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Mon Weather Rev 1950; 78: 1-3.
22. Cox D,. Two further applications of a model for binary regression. Biometrika 1958; 45: 562-565.
23. Redelmeier DA, Bloch DA, Hickam DH,. Assessing predictive accuracy: how to compare Brier scores. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 1141-1146.
24. Rothman K, Boice J Jr., Epidemiologic analysis with a programmable calculator. Bethesda, MD & Washington: US Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1979. NIH Pub, 79: 31-32.
25. Lloyd-Jones DM,. Cardiovascular risk prediction: basic concepts, current status, and future directions. Circulation 2010; 121: 1768-1777.
26. Siontis GC, Tzoulaki I, Ioannidis JP,. Predicting death: an empirical evaluation of predictive tools for mortality. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 1721-1726.
27. Kramer AA, Zimmerman JE,. Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: the Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 2052-2056. (Pubitemid 47326440)
28. Paul P, Pennell ML, Lemeshow S,. Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets. Stat Med 2013; 32: 67-80.
29. Suistomaa M, Niskanen M, Kari A, Hynynen M, Takala J,. Customized prediction models based on APACHE II and SAPS II scores in patients with prolonged length of stay in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 479-485. (Pubitemid 34328034)
30. Apolone G, Bertolini G, D'Amico R, Iapichino G, Cattaneo A, De Salvo G, Melotti RM,. The performance of SAPS II in a cohort of patients admitted to 99 Italian ICUs: results from GiViTI. Gruppo Italiano per la Valutazione degli interventi in Terapia Intensiva. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 1368-1378. (Pubitemid 27007773)
31. Metnitz PG, Lang T, Vesely H, Valentin A, Le Gall JR,. Ratios of observed to expected mortality are affected by differences in case mix and quality of care. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 1466-1472.