The views of general practitioners and practice nurses towards the barriers and facilitators of proactive, internet-based chlamydia screening for reaching young heterosexual men

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Lorimer, Karen ^a   Martin, Susan ^b   McDaid, Lisa M ^b  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING; CHLAMYDIA INFECTIONS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MASS SCREENING; NURSING PRACTICE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; SCOTLAND; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHLAMYDIA INFECTIONS; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PRACTICE PATTERNS, NURSES'; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; SCOTLAND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84902905368     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-127     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Testing Times. HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United Kingdom. The UK Collaborative Group for HIV and STI Surveillance, London: Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections 2007
2. Chlamydia prevalence in the general population: is there a sex difference? a systematic review. Dielissen PW, Teunissen DA, Lagro-Janssen TL, BMC Infect Dis 2013 13 1 534
3. National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NSCP) in England, The Bigger Picture Annual Report 2009
4. Network SIG, Management of Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection Edinburgh: Royal College of Physicians 2009
5. The chlamydia knowledge, awareness and testing practices of Australian general practitioners and practice nurses: survey findings from the Australian Chlamydia Control Effectiveness Pilot (ACCEPt). Lorch R, Hocking J, Temple-Smith M, Law M, Yeung A, Wood A, Vaisey A, Donovan B, Fairley CK, Kaldor J, BMC Fam Pract 2013 14 1 169
6. Chlamydia control activities in Europe: cross-sectional survey. Low N, Cassell JA, Spencer B, Bender N, Martin Hilber A, van Bergen J, Andersen B, Herrmann B, Dubois-Arber F, Hamers FF, van de Laar M, Stephenson JM, Eur J Public Health 2012 22 4 556 561
7. Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation. van den Broek I, van Bergen J, Brouwers E, Fennema J, Götz H, Hoebe CJPA, Koekenbier R, Kretzschmar M, Over EAB, Schmid BV, Pars L, van Ravesteijn S, van der Sande M, de Wit GA, Low N, Op de Coul ELM, BMJ 2012 345 4316
8. Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice. Salisbury C, Macleod J, Egger M, McCarthy A, Patel R, Holloway A, Ibrahim F, Sterne JAC, Horner P, Low N, Br J Gen Pract 2006 56 523 99 103 (Pubitemid 43216478)
9. Screening programmes for chlamydial infection: when will we ever learn? Low N, BMJ 2007 334 7596 725 728 (Pubitemid 46623736)
10. Chlamydia Key Clinical Indicator. NHS National Services Scotland, 2010 Available at http://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Sexual-Health/ Publications/2011-09-27/2011-09-27-Chlamydia-KCI-Report.pdf?88894289732 (24 June 2014, date last accessed)
11. Sexuality and health: the hidden costs of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. Duncan B, Hart G, BMJ 1999 318 7188 931 933 (Pubitemid 29191934)
12. It has to speak to people's everyday life: qualitative study of men and women's willingness to participate in a non-medical approach to Chlamydia trachomatis screening. Lorimer K, Reid ME, Hart GJ, Sex Transm Infect 2009 85 3 201 205
13. Interactive computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion [Systematic Review]. Bailey JV, Murray E, Rait G, Mercer CH, Morris RW, Peacock R, Cassell J, Nazareth I, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 9 6
14. Efficacy of computer technology-based HIV prevention interventions: A meta-analysis. Noar SM, Black HG, Pierce LB, AIDS 2009 23 1 107 115
15. What Young People Want From a Sexual Health Website: Design and Development of Sexunzipped. McCarthy O, Carswell K, Murray E, Free C, Stevenson F, Bailey JV, J Med Int Res 2012 14 5 127
16. Online Sexual Health Services: Examining Youth's Perspectives. Shoveller JA, Knight R, Davis W, Gilbert M, Ogilvie G, Can J Public Health 2012 103 1 14 18
17. Young Men's Views Toward the Barriers and Facilitators of Internet-Based Chlamydia Trachomatis Screening: Qualitative Study. Lorimer K, McDaid L, J Med Int Res 2013 15 12 265
18. Young people's perspectives on the use of reverse discourse in web-based sexual-health interventions. Davis WM, Shoveller JA, Oliffe JL, Gilbert M, Culture, Health Sexual 2012 14 9 1065 1079
19. Acceptability of the Internet-Based Chlamydia Screening Implementation in the Netherlands and Insights Into Nonresponse. Greenland KE, Op de Coul ELM, van Bergen JEAM, Brouwers EEHG, Fennema HJSA, Götz HM, Hoebe CJPA, Koekenbier RH, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, Sex Transm Dis 2011 38 6 467
20. Population-based outreach for Chlamydia screening in men: Results from a randomized trial. Scholes D, Heidrich FE, Yarbro P, Lindenbaum JE, Marrazzo JM, Sex Transm Dis 2007 34 11 837 839 (Pubitemid 350287495)
21. Internet testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in England, 2006 to 2010. Woodhall S, Sile B, Talebi A, Nardone A, Baraitser P, BMC Public Health 2012 12 1 1095
22. Overcoming the barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice - a qualitative study. McNulty CAM, Freeman E, Howell-Jones R, Hogan A, Randall S, Ford-Young W, Beckwith P, Oliver I, Fam Pract 2010 27 3 291 302
23. The Scottish Government, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, [ http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Statistics/SIMD ]
24. Chlamydia screening in general practice: views of professionals on the key elements of a successful programme. Ma R, Clark A, J Family Plan Reprod Health Care 2005 31 4 302 306
25. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers Sage Publications Ltd 2003
26. Analysing qualitative data. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N, BMJ 2000 320 7227 114 116 (Pubitemid 30173056)
27. Chlamydia testing in community pharmacies: evaluation of a feasibility pilot in south east London. Baraitser P, Pearce V, Holmes J, Horne N, Boynton PM, Qual Safety Health Care 2007 16 4 303 307 (Pubitemid 47262403)
28. Self-reported sexually transmitted infection testing behaviour amongst incarcerated young male offenders: findings from a qualitative study. Buston K, Wight D, J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2010 36 1 7 11
29. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, BMJ 2008 337 979 983
30. Effectiveness of chlamydia screening: systematic review. Low N, Bender N, Nartey L, Shang A, Stephenson JM, Int J Epidemiol 2009 38 2 435 448
31. Factors that shape young people's sexual behaviour: a systematic review. Marston C, King E, Lancet 2006 368 9547 1581 1586 (Pubitemid 44691913)
32. Global control of sexually transmitted infections. Low N, Broutet N, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Barton P, Hossain M, Hawkes S, Lancet 2006 368 9551 2001 2016 (Pubitemid 44822624)