Resource use and costs of type 2 diabetes patients receiving managed or protocolized primary care: A controlled clinical trial

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Van Der Heijden, Amber Awa ^a,b   De Bruijne, Martine C ^a   Feenstra, Talitha L ^b,c   Dekker, Jacqueline M ^a   Baan, Caroline A ^a,b   Bosmans, Judith E ^d   Bot, Sandra Dm ^a   Donker, Gé A ^e   Nijpels, Giel ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Controlled clinical trial; Health economy; Quality of health care; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Indexed keywords

AGED; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MALE; NETHERLANDS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION;

AGED; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH RESOURCES; HUMANS; MALE; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84902897906     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-280     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care 2013 36 1033 1046
2. The cost implications of health care reform. Gruber J, N Engl J Med 2010 362 2050 2051
3. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K, JAMA 2002 288 1775 1779
4. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K, JAMA 2002 288 1909 1914 (Pubitemid 35168149)
5. The future of primary care: transforming practice. Bodenheimer T, N Engl J Med 2008 359 2086 2089
6. Preventive care practices for diabetes management in two primary care samples. Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Am J Prev Med 2000 19 9 14 (Pubitemid 30364992)
7. Impact of a program to improve adherence to diabetes guidelines by primary care physicians. Kirkman MS, Williams SR, Caffrey HH, Marrero DG, Diabetes Care 2002 25 1946 1951 (Pubitemid 41071049)
8. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks JH, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA, N Engl J Med 2003 348 2635 2645 (Pubitemid 36741592)
9. A systematic review of diabetes disease management programs. Knight K, Badamgarav E, Henning JM, Hasselblad V, Gano AD, Ofman JJ, Weingarten SR, Am J Manag Care 2005 11 242 250 (Pubitemid 40569747)
10. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A, Health Aff 2001 20 64 78 (Pubitemid 33707442)
11. Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care. Wagner EH, Bennett SM, Austin BT, Greene SM, Schaefer JK, Vonkorff M, J Altern Complement Med 2005 11 Suppl 1 7 S15
12. Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews. Ouwens M, Wollersheim H, Hermens R, Hulscher M, Grol R, Int J Qual Health Care 2005 17 141 146 (Pubitemid 40485641)
13. Cost and effects of performance feedback and nurse case management for medicare beneficiaries with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Herrin J, Cangialose CB, Nicewander D, Ballard DJ, Dis Manag 2007 10 328 336
14. Economic evaluation of an intensified disease management system for patients with type 2 diabetes. Lairson DR, Yoon SJ, Carter PM, Greisinger AJ, Talluri KC, Aggarwal M, Wehmanen O, Dis Manag 2008 11 79 94 (Pubitemid 351571049)
15. The Vermedx Diabetes Information System reduces healthcare utilization. Littenberg B, MacLean CD, Zygarowski K, Drapola BH, Duncan JA, Frank CR, Am J Manag Care 2009 15 166 170
16. Evidence for the effect of disease management: is $1 billion a year a good investment? Mattke S, Seid M, Ma S, Am J Manag Care 2007 13 670 676 (Pubitemid 350294568)
17. Effect of a managed care disease management program on diabetes care. McEwen LN, Hsiao VC, Nota-Kirby EM, Kulpa GJ, Schmidt KG, Herman WH, Am J Manag Care 2009 15 575 580
18. A cost effectiveness study of integrated care in health services delivery: a diabetes program in Australia. McRae IS, Butler JR, Sibthorpe BM, Ruscoe W, Snow J, Rubiano D, Gardner KL, BMC Health Serv Res 2008 8 205
19. Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization. Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Newton KM, McCulloch DK, Ramsey SD, Grothaus LC, JAMA 2001 85 182 189 (Pubitemid 32048520)
20. Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. Wagner EH, Grothaus LC, Sandhu N, Galvin MS, McGregor M, Artz K, Coleman EA, Diabetes Care 2001 24 695 700 (Pubitemid 32888850)
21. NHG-Guidelines type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (second version). Rutten GEHM, de Grauw WJC, Nijpels G, Goudswaard AN, Uitewaal PJM, van der Does FEE, Heine RJ, van Ballegooie E, Veduijn MM, Bouma M, Huisarts Wet 2006 49 137 152
22. Continuous morbidity registration sentinels Netherlands 2006 NIVEL, annual report. Donker GA, 2007 http://www.nivel.nl/pdf/CMR-Peilstations-2006.pdf
23. The cost diary: a method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research. Goossens ME, Rutten-van Molken MP, Vlaeyen JW, van der Linden SM, J Clin Epidemiol 2000 53 688 695 (Pubitemid 30609621)
24. Oostenbrink JB, Bouwmans CAM, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH, Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek: Methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. Geactualiseerde versie 2004 [Handbook for cost studies: methods and standard costs for economic evaluation in health care. Updated version 2004] Den Haag, The Netherlands: College voor Zorgverzekeringen 2004
25. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ, Health Econ 1997 6 327 340 (Pubitemid 27384638)
26. Twisk J, Applied Multilevel Analysis: A Practical Guide Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010
27. Can primary care professionals' adherence to evidence based medicine tools improve quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus? A systematic review. de Belvis AG, Pelone F, Biasco A, Ricciardi W, Volpe M, Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009 85 119 131
28. Determinants of quality in diabetes care process: the population-based Torino study. Gnavi R, Picariello R, la Karaghiosoff L, Costa G, Giorda C, Diabetes Care 2009 32 1986 1992
29. Comparison of direct costs of type 2 diabetes care: different care models with different outcomes. Giorda CB, Picariello R, Nada E, Tartaglino B, Marafetti L, Costa G, Petrelli A, Gnavi R, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2014 28 0939 S4753
30. The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes. Giorda C, Picariello R, Nada E, Tartaglino B, Marafetti L, Costa G, Gnavi R, PLoS One 2012 7 33839
31. Health diaries. Verbrugge LM, Med Care 1980 18 73 95 (Pubitemid 10106704)
32. Who is at risk for long-term sickness absence? A prospective cohort study of Danish employees. Lund T, Labriola M, Villadsen E, Work 2007 28 225 230 (Pubitemid 46561878)
33. Differences in treatment regimes, consultation frequency and referral patterns of diabetes mellitus in general practice in five European countries. Donker GA, Fleming DM, Schellevis FG, Spreeuwenberg P, Fam Pract 2004 21 364 369 (Pubitemid 39177410)