A systematic review of diabetes disease management programs

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 242-250

  Knight, Kevin ^a   Badamgarav, Enkhe ^d   Henning, James M ^e   Hasselblad, Vic ^f   Anacleto Jr , D Gano ^d   Ofman, Joshua J ^b,c,g   Weingarten, Scott R ^b,c  

^a PARTNERSHIP FOR HEALTH ANALYTIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^b Zynx Health   (United States)

^c CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Cerner Health Insights   (United States)

^e TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS INC   (United States)

^f DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g AMGEN INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

DATA BASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; FOOT DISEASE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINOPATHY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CHOLESTEROL; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 17644368158     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Songer TJ, Ettaro L; Economics of Diabetes Project Panel. Studies on the Costs of Diabetes. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1998.
2. American Diabetes Association. Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the US in 1997. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:296-309.
3. Rubin RJ, Altman WM, Mendelson DN. Health care expenditures for people with diabetes mellitus, 1992. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78:809A-809F.
4. Alberti KC, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications: part T: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15:539-553.
5. Conseil Superieur du Diabete. Diabetes care and research in Europe: the St. Vincent Declaration Action Program [in French]. Diabetes Metab. 1992;18:334-377.
6. Kenny SJ, Smith PJ, Goldschmid MG, Newman JM, Herman WH. Survey of physician practice behaviors related to diabetes mellitus in the US: physician adherence to consensus recommendations. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:1507-1510.
7. Stolar MW; Endocrine Fellows Foundation Study Group. Clinical management of the NIDDM patient: impact of the American Diabetes Association practice guidelines, 1985-1993. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:701-707.
8. Helseth LD, Susman JL, Crabtree BF, O'Connor PJ. Primary care physicians' perceptions of diabetes management: a balancing act. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:37-42.
9. O'Connor PJ. From blame to understanding: moving diabetes care forward. J Fam Pract. 1998;46:205-206.
10. Anderson RM, Donnelly MB, Dedrick RF, Gressard CP. The attitudes of nurses, dietitians, and physicians toward diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1991;17:261-268.
11. Anderson RM, Donnelly MB, Davis WK. Controversial beliefs about diabetes and its care. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:859-863.
12. Golin CE, DiMatteo MR, Gelberg L. The role of patient participation in the doctor visit: implications for adherence to diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:1153-1164.
13. Wing RR, Epstein LH, Nowalk MP, Scott N, Koeske R. Compliance to self-monitoring of blood glucose: a marked-item technique compared with self-report. Diabetes Care. 1985;8:456-460.
14. Christensen NK, Terry RD, Wyatt S, Pichert JW, Lorenz RA. Quantitative assessment of dietary adherence in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1983;6:245-250.
15. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;CD001481.
16. Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, et al. The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:15-38.
17. Ellrodt G, Cook DJ, Lee J, et al. Evidence-based disease management. JAMA. 1997;278:1687-1692.
18. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) Web site. Available at: http://www.epoc.uottawa.ca. Accessed July 19, 2000.
19. Psaty BM, Furberg CD, Kuller LH, et al. Association between blood pressure level and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and total mortality: the cardiovascular health study. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1183-1192.
20. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press; 1985.
21. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-188.
22. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, England JD, McKenzie EM. Glycated hemoglobin: methodologies and clinical applications. Clin Chem. 1986;32 (suppl):B64-B70.
23. Jovanovic L, Peterson CM. The clinical utility of glycosylated hemoglobin. Am J Med. 1981:70:331-338.
24. Bunn HF. Nonenzymatic glycosylation of protein: relevance to diabetes. Am J Med. 1981;70:325-330.
25. Baynes JW, Bunn HF, Goldstein D, et al. National Diabetes Data Group: report of the expert committee on glucosylated hemoglobin. Diabetes Care. 1984;7:602-606.
26. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, England JD, Rohlfing CL. Glycated haemoglobin estimation in the 1990's: a review of assay methods and clinical interpretation. In: Marshall SM, Home PD, eds. The Diabetes Annual. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science BV; 1994:193-212.
27. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629-634.
28. Light RJ, Pillemer DB. Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1984.
29. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting tor publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56:455-463.
30. Piette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:202-208.
31. Donohoe ME, Fletton JA, Hook A, et al. Improving foot care for people with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial of an integrated care approach. Diabet Med. 2000;17:581-587.
32. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care: a randomized, controlled trial. Med Care. 2000;38:218-230.
33. Benjamin EM, Schneider MS, Hinchey KT. Implementing practice guidelines for diabetes care using problem-based learning: a prospective controlled trial using firm systems. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1672-1678.
34. Ridgeway NA, Harvill DR, Harvill LM, et al. Improved control of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a practical education/behavior modification program in a primary care clinic. South Med J. 1999;92:667-672.
35. Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, et al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization: efficacy of care management using cluster visits. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:2011-2017.
36. Aubert RE, Herman WH, Waters J, et al. Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:605-612.
37. Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S, Spiegal N, Campbell MJ; Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team. Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. BMJ. 1998;317:1202-1208.
38. Kulkarni K, Castle G, Gregory R, et al; Diabetes Care and Education Dietetic Practice Group. Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus positively affect dietitian practices and patient outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98:62-70.
39. de Sonnaville JJ, Bouma M, Colly LP, Deville W, Wijkel D, Heine RJ. Sustained good giycaemic control in NIDDM patients by implementation of structured care in general practice: 2-year follow-up study. Diabetologia. 1997;40:1334-1340.
40. Jaber LA, Halapy H, Fernet M, Tummalapalli S, Diwakaran H. Evaluation of a pharmaceutical care model on diabetes management. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30:238-243.
41. O'Connor PJ, Rush WA, Peterson J, et al. Continuous quality improvement can improve glycemic control for HMO patients with diabetes. Arch Fam Med. 1996;5:502-506.
42. Domenech MI, Assad D, Mazzei ME, Kronsbein P, Gagliardino JJ. Evaluation of the effectiveness of an ambulatory teaching/treatment programme for non-insulin dependent (type 2) diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol. 1995;32:143-147.
43. Franz MJ, Monk A, Barry B, et al. Effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95:1009-1017.
44. Pieber TR, Holler A, Siebenhofer A, et al. Evaluation of a structured teaching and treatment programme for type 2 diabetes in general practice in a rural area of Austria. Diabet Med. 1995;12:349-354.
45. Naji S, Cameron I, Russell I, et al; Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation Team. Integrated care for diabetes: clinical, psychosocial, and economic evaluation. BMJ. 1994;308:1208-1212.
46. Hurwitz B, Goodman C, Yudkin J. Prompting the clinical care of non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetic patients in an inner city area: one model of community care. BMJ. 1993;306:624-630.
47. Litzelman DK, Slemenda CW, Langefeld CD, et al. Reduction of lower extremity clinical abnormalities in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:36-41.
48. Weinberger M, Kirkman MS, Samsa GP, et al. A nurse-coordinated intervention for primary care patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: impact on glycemic control and health-related quality of life. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:59-66.
49. D'Eramo-Melkus GA, Wylie-Rosett J, Hagan JA. Metabolic impact of education in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:864-869.
50. de Weerdt I, Visser AP, Kok GJ, de Weerdt O, van der Veen EA. Randomized controlled multicentre evaluation of an education programme for insulin-treated diabetic patients: effects on metabolic control, quality of life, and costs of therapy. Diabet Med. 1991;8:338-345.
51. Raz I, Soskolne V, Stein P. Influence of small-group education sessions on glucose homeostasis in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1988;11:67-71.
52. Vinicor F, Cohen SJ, Mazzuca SA, et al. DIABEDS: a randomized trial of the effects of physician and/or patient education on diabetes patient outcomes. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:345-356.
53. Mazzuca SA, Moorman NH, Wheeler ML, et al. The diabetes education study: a controlled trial of the effects of diabetes patient education. Diabetes Care. 1986;9:1-10.
54. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-986.
55. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) [published correction appears in Lancet. 1999;354:602]. Lancet. 1998;352:837-853.
56. Harris MI, Eastman RC, Cowie CC, Flegal KM, Eberhardt MS. Racial and ethnic differences in glycemic control of adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:403-408.
57. Weingarten SR, Henning JM, Badamgarav E, et al. Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness: which ones work? meta-analysis of published reports. BMJ [serial online]. 2002;325:E925. Available at: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/325/7370/925. Accessed August 31, 2004.