Elaborated contextual framing is necessary for action-based attitude acquisition

Cognition and Emotion

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1119-1126

  Laham, Simon M ^a   Kashima, Yoshihisa ^a   Dix, Jennifer ^a   Wheeler, Melissa ^a   Levis, Bianca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Arm extension; Arm flexion; Attitude acquisition; Attitude behaviour; Embodiment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONDITIONING; ELABORATED CONTEXTUAL FRAMING; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT; ARM; ASSOCIATION; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM; ATTITUDE; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84902810045     PISSN: 02699931     EISSN: 14640600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.867833     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 5-17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5
2. Centerbar, D. B., & Clore, G. L. (2006). Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes? Psychological Science, 17(1), 22-29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01660.x
3. Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215-224. doi:10.1177/0146167299025002007
4. De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230-241.
5. De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1-20.
6. Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation-behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218-235. doi:10.1037/a0015220
7. Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262-281. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
8. Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundation of social behavior (pp. 204-243). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9. Gast, A., Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Evaluative conditioning: Recent developments and future directions. Learning and Motivation, 43(3), 79-88. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.004
10. Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyans, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390-421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
11. Huijding, J., Muris, P., Lester, K., Field, A. P., & Joosse, G. (2011). Training children to approach or to avoid novel animals: Effects on self-reported attitudes and fear beliefs and information seeking behaviors. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 606-613. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.005
12. Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957-971. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957
13. Kawakami, K., Steele, J. R., Cifa, C., Phills, C. E., & Dovidio, J. F. (2008). Approaching math increases math = me and math = pleasant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 818-825. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.009
14. Krieglmeyer, R., De Houwer, J., & Deutsch, R. (2013). On the nature of automatically triggered approach-avoidance behavior. Emotion Review, 5, 280-284. doi:10.1177/1754073913477501
15. Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270-1296. doi:10.1080/02699930701438152
16. Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16(1), 6-10. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x
17. Op de Beeck, H. P., Torfs, K., & Wagemans, J. (2008). Perceived shape similarity among unfamiliar objects and the organization of the human object vision pathway. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10111-10123. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2511-08.2008
18. Priester, J. R., Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The influence of motor processes on attitudes toward novel versus familiar semantic stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 442-447. doi:10.1177/0146167296225002
19. Rotteveel, M., & Phaf, R. H. (2004). Automatic affective evaluation does not automatically predispose for arm flexion and extension. Emotion, 4, 156-172. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.156
20. Seibt, B., Neumann, R., Nussinson, R., & Strack, F. (2008). Movement direction or change in distance? Self- and object-related approach-avoidance motions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 713-720. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.013
21. Vandenbosch, K., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Failures to induce implicit evaluations by means of approach-avoid training. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1311-1330. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.596819
22. Woud, M. L., Becker, E. S., Lange, W.-G., & Rinck, M. (2013). Effects of approach-avoidance training on implicit and explicit evaluations of neutral, angry and smiling face stimuli. Psychologial Reports, 113, 1211-1228.
23. Woud, M. L., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2008). Implicit evaluation bias induced by approach and avoidance. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 1187-1197. doi:10.1080/02699930801906843
24. Woud, M. L., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2011a). Corrigendum. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1309-1310. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.601964
25. Woud, M. L., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2011b). Induction of implicit evaluation biases by approach-avoidance training: A commentary on Vandenbosch and De Houwer (this issue). Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1331-1338. doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.628300
26. Woud, M. L., Maas, J., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2013). Make the manikin move: Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 738-744. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.817413