Understanding the rift, the (still) uneasy bedfellows of History and Organization Studies

Organization

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 907-932

  Greenwood, Anna ^a   Bernardi, Andrea ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

History; organization; research methods; social sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902790439     PISSN: 13505084     EISSN: 14617323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1350508413514286     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Abrams P.Historical Sociology. London: Open Books; 1980a:
2. Abrams P.History, Sociology, Historical Sociology.Past and Present. 1980b;87:3-16
3. Acton J.Lectures on Modern History. London: Macmillan; 1895 1930:
4. Barratt E.Re-Reading C. Wright Mills.Organization. 2011;18:1-18
5. Beckman C. M.,Burton M. D.Founding the Future: Path Dependence in the Evolution of Top Management Teams from Founding to IPO.Organization Science. 2008;19 (1): 3-24
6. Berger P. L.,Luckmann T.The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin; 1966:
7. Bloch M.The Historian’s Craft. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1954:
8. Bloch M.The Royal Touch: Sacred Monarchy and Scrofula in England and France. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul; 1973:
9. Booth C.,Rowlinson M.Management and Organizational History: Prospects.Management and Organizational History. 2006;1 (1): 5-30
10. Bourdieu P.The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1990:
11. Braudel F.La Méditerranée et le Monde Méditerranéen à l’Epoque de Philippe II. Paris: Colin; 1949:
12. Braudel F.Economy and Society in Early Modern Europe. Burke Peter, ed. London: Routledge; 1958 1972:
13. Braverman H.Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press; 1974:
14. Bruce K.,Nyland C.Elton Mayo and the Deification of Human Relations.Organization Studies. 2011;32:383-405
15. Bruce K.Henry S. Dennison, Elton Mayo, and Human Relations Historiography.Management and Organizational History. 2006;1 (2): 177-99
16. Brunninge O.Using History in Organizations: How Managers Make Purposeful Reference to History.Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2009;22:8-26
17. Budd A.The Modern Historiographical Reader. London: Routledge; 2009:
18. Bullock A.Has History Ceased to be Relevant?.The Historian. 1994;43 (104): 16-19
19. Burrell G.Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis: The Contribution of Michel Foucault.Organization Studies. 1988;9 (2): 221-35
20. Butterfield H.The Whig Interpretation of History. London: G Bell; 1931:
21. Carr E. H.What is History. London: Penguin Books; 1961:
22. Carroll G. R.,Hannan M.T.The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2000:
23. Carter C.,McKinlay A.,Rowlinson M.Foucault, Management and History.Organization. 2002;9 (4): 515-26
24. Cesarano F.Economic History and Economic Theory.Journal of Economic Methodology. 2006;13 (4): 447-67
25. Chandler A.D.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998:
26. Chandler A.D.Scale and Scope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990:
27. Chandler A.D.The Visible Hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1977:
28. Clark P.,Rowlinson M.Treatment of History in Organization Studies: Towards an “Historic Turn”?.Business History. 2004;46:331-52
29. Clegg S.,Bailey J.R.International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. London: Sage; 2008:
30. Clegg S.Foucault, Management and Organization Theory. McKinlay A.Starkey K., ed. London: Sage; 1998:29-48.
31. Clegg S. R.,Higgins W.Against the Current: Organizational Sociology and Socialism.Organization Studies. 1987;8:201-21
32. Cooke B.The Cold War Origin of Action Research as Managerialist Cooptation.Human Relations. 2006;59 (5): 665-93
33. Costea B.,Crump N.,Holm J.Conceptual History and the Interpretation of Managerial Ideologies.Management and Organizational History. 2006;1 (2): 159-75
34. Cunliffe A. L.,Luhman J.T.,Boje D.M.Narrative Temporality: Implications for Organizational Research.Organization Studies. 2004;25 (2): 261-86
35. Czarniawska B.Qualitative Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:
36. David P.A.Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.American Economic Review. 1985;75 (2): 332-37
37. Davies S.Empiricism and History. Bristol: Palgrave; 2003:
38. Davis G. F.Do Theories of Organizations Progress?.Organizational Research Methods. 2010;13:690-709
39. Decker S.The Silence of the Archives: Business History, Post-colonialism and Archival Ethnography.Management and Organizational History. 2013;8:155-73
40. Douglas M.How Institutions Think. London: Routledge; 1987:
41. Durepos G.,Mills A. J.Actor-Network Theory, ANTi-History and Critical Organizational Historiography.Organization. 2011;18:1-19
42. Durkheim ÉSelected Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1902:
43. Edwards R.Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Work-Place in the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1979:
44. Elias N.The Civilizing Process: The History of Manners and State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Blackwell; 1994:
45. Elton G. R.The Practice of History. London: Methuen; 1967:
46. Eloranta J.,Ojala J.,Valtonen H.Quantitative Methods in Business History: An Impossible Equation?.Management and Organizational History. 2010;5 (1): 79-107
47. Engwall L.Mercury Meets Minerva. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1992:
48. Evans R. J.In Defence of History. London: Granta Books; 2000:
49. Fleetwood S.Ontology in Organization and Management Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective.Organization. 2005;12 (2): 197-222
50. Fligstein N.The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991:311-36.
51. Foster W. M.,Suddaby R.,Minkus A.,Wiebe E.History as Social Memory Assets: The Example of Tim Hortons.Management and Organizational History. 2011;6 (1): 101-20
52. Gherardi S.,Strati A.The Temporal Dimension in Organizational Studies.Organization Studies. 1988;9:149-64
53. Goldthorpe J.The Uses of History in Sociology: Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies.British Journal of Sociology. 1991;42:211-30
54. Green A.,Troup K.The Houses of History: A Critical Reader in Twentieth Century History and Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999:
55. Greiner L.Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow.Harvard Business Review. 1972;50 (4): 37-46
56. Hannan M. T.,Freeman J.The Population Ecology of Organizations.American Journal of Sociology. 1977;82 (5): 929-64
57. Harrison R. J.,March J.G.Decision Making and Post-Decision Surprises.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1986;29 (1): 26-42
58. Hassard J.Sociology and Organization Theory: Positivism, Paradigms and Postmodernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993:
59. Hassard J.Rethinking the Hawthorne Studies: The Western Electric Research in its Social, Political and Historical Context.Human Relations. 2012;65:1341-461
60. Hassard J.,Wolfram Cox J.,Rowlinson M.Where are the Old Theories of Organization? Prospects for Retrospection in Organization Theory.Academy of Management Review. 2013;38 (2): 309-13
61. Hinings C. R.Thirty Years of Organization Studies: Enduring Themes in a Changing Institutional Field.Organization Studies. 2010;31:659-75
62. Hofstadter R.The Varieties of History: From Voltaire to the Present. Stern F. R., ed. New York, NY: Meridian Books; 1956:
63. Hoskin K.Spacing, Timing and the Invention of Management.Organization. 2004;11:743-57
64. Iggers G.Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press; 2005:
65. Jensen M.C.,Meckling W.H.Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics. 1976;3:305-60
66. Kaplan T.J.The Narrative Structure of Policy Analysis.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 1986;5:761-78
67. Kieser A.Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses and How this Should be Performed.Organization Science. 1994;5 (4): 608-20
68. Laslett P.The World We Have Lost. London: Methuen; 1965:
69. Leblebici H.,Shah N.The Birth, Transformation and Regeneration of Business Incubators as New Organisational Forms: Understanding the Interplay Between Organisational History and Organisational Theory.Business History. 2004;46 (3): 353-80
70. Martin J.Deconstructing Organizational Taboos: The Suppression of Gender Conflict in Organizations.Organization Science. 1990;1:339-59
71. Marwick A.The New Nature of History: Knowledge, Evidence, Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2001:
72. Mckinlay A.Managing Foucault: Genealogies of Management.Management and Organizational History. 2006;1 (1): 87-100
73. Mill J. S.A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Robson J. M., ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1843 1974:
74. Mills C.W.The Sociological Imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1959:
75. Munslow A.The New History. Edinburgh: Pearson; 2003:
76. Newton T.Knowledge and Practice: “Organization Studies within a Historical and Figurational Context”.Organization Studies. 2010;31:1369-95
77. O’Sullivan M.,Graham M.B.W.Moving Forward by Looking Backward: Business History and Management Studies.Journal of Management Studies. 2010;47 (5): 775-91
78. Parker L. D.,Ritson P.A.Revisiting Fayol: Anticipating Contemporary Management.British Journal of Management. 2005;16:175-94
79. Pfeffer J.Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable.Academy of Management Review. 1993;18:599-620
80. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Powell W. W.DiMaggio P., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991:
81. Ricoeur P.The Reality of the Historical Past. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press; 1984:
82. Rorty R.The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1967:
83. Rowlinson M.Business History and Organization Theory.Journal of Industrial History. 2001;4:1-23
84. Rowlinson M.,Carter C.Foucault and History in Organization Studies.Organization. 2002;9 (4): 527-47
85. Rowlinson M.,Hassard J.Historical Methods in Management and Organization Studies.presentation at EGOS; 2011Goteborg; 2011.
86. Rowlinson M.,Hassard J.,Decker S.Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue Between Historical Theory and Organization Theory.Academy of Management Review.:
87. Schreyögg G.,Sydow J.,Holtmann P.How History Matters in Organizations: The Case of Path Dependence.Management and Organizational History. 2011;6 (1): 81-100
88. Scott R.Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:
89. Sewell W. H.The Temporalities of Capitalism.Socio-Economic Review. 2008;6:517-37
90. Sewell W. H.The Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2005:
91. Shenav Y.Manufacturing Rationality: The Engineering Foundations of the Managerial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999:
92. Smith B.The Gender of History: Men, Women and Historical Practice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 1998:
93. Spector B.The Harvard Business Review Goes to War.Management and Organizational History. 2006;1 (3): 273-95
94. Spencer H.An Autobiography. London: Williams and Northgate; 1904:
95. Stager Jacques R.History, Historiography and Organization Studies: The Challenge and the Potential.Management and Organizational History. 2006;1 (1): 31-49
96. Starbuck W. H.,Milliken F. J.Challenger: Fine Tuning the Odds Until Something Breaks.Journal of Management Studies. 1988;25 (4): 319-40
97. Stedman Jones G.From Historical Sociology to Theoretical History.British Journal of Sociology. 1976;27 (3): 295-305
98. Stokes P.,Yiannis G.Engaging with Genocide: The Challenge for Organization and Management Studies.Organization. 2010;17:461-80
99. Sydow J.,Schreyögg G.,Koch J.Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box.Academy of Management Review. 2009;34:689-709
100. Tadajewski M.The Politics of the Behavioural Revolution in Organization Studies.Organization. 2009;16:733-54
101. Tilly C.The Dimensions of the Past. Lorwin ValPrice Jacob, ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1972:86-117.
102. Tilly C.As Sociology Meets History. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1981:
103. Tilly C.The Old New Social History and the New Old Social History.Review. 1984;7:363-406
104. Tilly C.The Tyranny of Here and Now.Sociological Forum. 1986;1:179-88
105. Üsdiken B.,Kieser A.Introduction: History in Organisation Studies.Business History. 2004;46 (3): 321-30
106. Üsdiken B.,Kipping M.,Engwall L.Historical Perspectives on Organizational Stability and Change: Introduction to the Special Issue.Management and Organizational History. 2011;6 (1): 3-12
107. Van de Ven A. H.,Poole M. S.Explaining Development and Change in Organizations.Academy of Management Review. 1995;20 (3): 510-40
108. Van Maanen J.Style as Theory.Organization Science. 1995;6:133-43
109. Vaughan D.The Challenger Launch, Decision, Risk, Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1996:
110. Vergne J.,Durand R.The Path of Most Persistence: An Evolutionary Perspective on Path Dependence and Dynamic Capabilities.Organization Studies. 2011;32:365-82
111. Vincent J.An Intelligent Person’s Guide to History. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd; 2005:
112. Wadwani R.D.,Bucheli M.Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013:
113. Warren R.,Tweedale G.Business Ethics and Business History: Neglected Dimensions in Management Education.British Journal of Management. 2002;13:209-19
114. Weber M.Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr; 1904:1-145.
115. Weber M.Basic Concepts in Sociology. London: Peter Owen; 1922:
116. Debating Organizations: Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies. Westwood R.Clegg S., ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003:
117. White H.Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1973:
118. Williamson O.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press; 1985:
119. Wilson J. M.,McKinlay A.Rethinking the Assembly Line, Organisation, Performance and Productivity in Ford Motor Company, 1908–27.Business History. 2010;52:760-78
120. Wolfram Cox J.,Hassard J.Ties to the Past in Organization Research: A Comparative Analysis of Retrospective Methods.Organization. 2007;14:475-97
121. Ybema S.Talk of Change: Temporal Contrasts and Collective Identities.Organization Studies. 2010;31:481-503
122. Zald M. N.Institutions in American Society: Essays in Market, Political and Social Organizations. Jackson J.E., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1989:81-108.
123. Zald M. N.Organization Studies as a Scientific and Humanistic Enterprise: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Foundation of the Field.Organization Science. 1993;4 (4): 513-28
124. Zald M. N.More Fragmentation? Unfinished Business in Linking the Social Sciences and the Humanities.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1996;41:251-61
125. Zald M. N.Spinning Disciplines: Critical Management Studies in the Context of the Transformation of Management Education.Organization. 2002;9:365-85