Practice network-based care management for patients with type 2 diabetes and multiple comorbidities (GEDIMAplus): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Bozorgmehr, Kayvan ^a   Szecsenyi, Joachim ^a   Ose, Dominik ^a   Besier, Werner ^b   Mayer, Manfred ^b   Krisam, Johannes ^a   Jacke, Christian O ^c   Salize, Hans Joachim ^c   Brandner, Ralf ^d   Schmitt, Sandra ^d   Kiel, Marion ^a   Kamradt, Martina ^a   Freund, Tobias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Genossenschaft Gesundheitsprojekt Mannheim eG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^d InterComponentWare AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Care management; Chronic care; Diabetes; Multi morbidity; Primary care; Self care

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ARTICLE; ASTHMA; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CHRONIC PAIN; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY CARE PRACTICE NETWORK BASED CARE MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SUMMARY OF DIABETES SELF CARE ACTIVITIY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD; CASE MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ECONOMICS; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE COST; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CASE MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COMORBIDITY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; GERMANY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HOUSE CALLS; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LINEAR MODELS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENTS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF CARE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84902707135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-243     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002, 162:2269-2276. 10.1001/archinte.162.20.2269, 12418941.
2. Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen [Advisory Council on the Assessment of Developments in the Health Care System] [Sondergutachten 2009: Koordination und Integration-Gesundheitsversorgung in einer Gesellschaft des längeren Lebens] Special Report 2009: Coordination and Integration-Health Care in an Ageing Society 2010, Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos-Verlag, English version available at http://www.svr-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Gutachten/2009/KF_engl_final.pdf (accessed 5 June 2014), Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen [Advisory Council on the Assessment of Developments in the Health Care System].
3. Valderas JM, Starfield B, Sibbald B, Salisbury C, Roland M. Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services. Ann Fam Med 2009, 7:357-363. 10.1370/afm.983, 2713155, 19597174.
4. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001, 20:64-78. 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64, 11816692.
5. Rosenthal TC. The medical home: growing evidence to support a new approach to primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2008, 21:427-440. 10.3122/jabfm.2008.05.070287, 18772297.
6. Freund T, Peters-Klimm F, Rochon J, Mahler C, Gensichen J, Erler A, Beyer M, Baldauf A, Gerlach FM, Szecsenyi J. Primary care practice-based care management for chronically ill patients (PraCMan): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN56104508]. Trials 2011, 12:163. 10.1186/1745-6215-12-163, 3141533, 21714883.
7. Bodenheimer TS, Berry-Millett R. Care Management of Patients with Complex Health Care Needs (Research Synthesis Report 19) 2009, Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Available at http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2009/rwjf49853/subassets/rwjf49853_1.
8. Boult C, Wieland GD. Comprehensive primary care for older patients with multiple chronic conditions: " nobody rushes you through" . JAMA 2010, 304:1936-1943. 10.1001/jama.2010.1623, 21045100.
9. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000, 23:943-950. 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943, 10895844.
10. Fisher EB, Chan JCN, Nan H, Sartorius N, Oldenburg B. Co-occurrence of diabetes and depression: conceptual considerations for an emerging global health challenge. J Affect Disord 2012, 142(Supplement):S56-S66.
11. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Venkat Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2001, 24:561-587. 10.2337/diacare.24.3.561, 11289485.
12. Busse R. Disease management programs in Germany's statutory health insurance system. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004, 23:56-67.
13. Smith SM, Soubhi H, Fortin M, Hudon C, O'Dowd T. Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings. BMJ 2012, 345:e5205. 10.1136/bmj.e5205, 3432635, 22945950.
14. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ, Wagner EH, van Eijk JT, Assendelft WJJ. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2001, 24:1821-1833. 10.2337/diacare.24.10.1821, 11574449.
15. Du S, Yuan C. Evaluation of patient self-management outcomes in health care: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev 2010, 57:159-167. 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00794.x, 20579149.
16. Gandhi GY, Murad M, Fujiyoshi A, Mullan RJ, Flynn DN, Elamin MB, Swiglo BA, Isley WL, Guyatt GH, Montori VM. Patient-important outcomes in registered diabetes trials. JAMA 2008, 299:2543-2549. 10.1001/jama.299.21.2543, 18523223.
17. Rosemann T, Joos S, Laux G, Gensichen J, Szecsenyi J. Case management of arthritis patients in primary care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2007, 57:1390-1397. 10.1002/art.23080, 18050178.
18. Gensichen J, von Korff M, Peitz M, Muth C, Beyer M, Güthlin C, Torge M, Petersen JJ, Rosemann T, König J, Gerlach FM, . PRoMPT (Primary care Monitoring for depressive Patients Trial) Case management for depression by health care assistants in small primary care practices: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:369-378. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-6-200909150-00001, 19755362, PRoMPT (Primary care Monitoring for depressive Patients Trial).
19. Peters-Klimm F, Campbell S, Hermann K, Kunz CU, Müller-Tasch T, Szecsenyi J, . the Competence Network Heart Failure Case management for patients with chronic systolic heart failure in primary care: the HICMan exploratory randomised controlled trial. Trials 2010, 11:56. 10.1186/1745-6215-11-56, 2882359, 20478035, the Competence Network Heart Failure.
20. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655, 2769032, 18824488.
21. Perera R, Heneghan C, Yudkin P. Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions. BMJ 2007, 334:127-129. 10.1136/bmj.39045.396817.68, 1779898, 17235093.
22. Gemeinshamer Bundesausschuss Richtlinie des gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses zur Umsetzung der Regelungen in § 62 für schwerwiegende chronische Erkrankte (" Chroniker Richtlinie" ) 20 August 2008. Available at https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-278/Chr-RL_2008-06-19.pdf (accessed 5 June 2014), Gemeinshamer Bundesausschuss.
23. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001, 33:337-343. 10.3109/07853890109002087, 11491192.
24. Freund T, Gensichen J, Goetz K, Szecsenyi J, Mahler C. Evaluating self-efficacy for managing chronic disease: psychometric properties of the six-item Self-Efficacy Scale in Germany. J Eval Clin Pract 2013, 19:39-43. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01764.x, 21883720.
25. Roick C, Kilian R, Matschinger H, Bernert S, Mory C, Angermeyer MC. [German adaptation of the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory: an instrument for the cost of mental health care] [Article in German]. Psychiatr Prax 2001, 28(Suppl 2):S84-S90.
26. Chrisholm D, Knapp MR, Knudsen HC, Amaddeo F, Gaite L, van Wijngaarden B. Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory-European Version: development of an instrument for international research. EPSILON Study 5. European Psychiatric Services: Inputs Linked to Outcome Domains and Needs. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 2000, (39):s28-s33.
27. Goetz K, Freund T, Gensichen J, Miksch A, Szecsenyi J, Steinhaeuser J. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the PACIC short form. Am J Manag Care 2012, 18:e55-e60.
28. Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften NVL Diabetes-Strukturierte Schulungsprogramme, Praxishilfe - PAID (Kurzform) Berlin: Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin (ÄZQ), 23 November 2012, version 1.0. Available at http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/praxishilfen/dm2schulung_praxis/pdf/paid-kurzform-mit-erlaeuterung.pdf (accessed 5 June 2014), Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften.
29. Psychiatric Research Unit, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Fragebogen zum Wohlbefinden (fünf) [German version of the WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5)]. Hillerød, Denmark: Frederiksborg General Hospital; 1998. Available at http://www.psykiatri-regionh.dk/NR/rdonlyres/3F12728C-B0CD-4C50-A714-B6064159A314/0/WHO5_German.pdf (accessed 5 June 2014), Psychiatric Research Unit, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health.
30. AUDIT-C-Fragebogen. Freiburg, Germany Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Suchtforschungsverbund Baden-Württemberg Available at http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/downloads/AlkAUDITCFragebogen.pdf (accessed 5 June 2014), AUDIT-C-Fragebogen. Freiburg, Germany.
31. Schenk L, Bau AM, Borde T, Butler J, Lampert T, Neuhauser H, Razum O, Weilandt C. [A basic set of indicators for mapping migrant status: recommendations for epidemiological practice] [Article in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2006, 49:853-860. 10.1007/s00103-006-0018-4, 16927038.
32. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik JHP, Glemser A, Heckel C, von der Heyde C, Quitt H, Hanefeld U, Herter-Eschweiler R, Mohr S. Statistik und Wissenschaft: Demographische Standards Ausgabe 2010 (Band 17) 2010, Statistisches Bundesamt: Wiesbaden, Germany, Available at https://www.destatis.de/DE/Methoden/StatistikWissenschaftBand17.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.; (accessed 5 June 2014).
33. Noll HH, Weick S. Schichtzugehörigkeit nicht nur vom Einkommen bestimmt. Informationsdienst Soziale Indikatoren 2011, 45:1-7. Available at http://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/forschung/publikationen/zeitschriften/isi/isi-45.pdf.; (accessed 5 June 2014).
34. Glazier RH, Bajcar J, Kennie NR, Willson K. A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Care 2006, 29:1675-1688. 10.2337/dc05-1942, 16801602.
35. Instut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG) Abschlussbericht: Urin- und Blutzuckerselbstmessung bei Diabetes mellitus Typ 2 Cologne, Germany: IQWiG, 4 October 2009. Available at https://www.iqwig.de/download/A05-08_Abschlussbericht_Zuckerselbstmessung_bei_Diabetes_mellitus_Typ_2.pdf (accessed 5 June 2014, Instut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG).
36. Malanda UL, Welschen LMC, Riphagen II, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Bot SDM. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 1. CD005060. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005060.pub3.
37. Farmer AJ, Perera R, Ward A, Heneghan C, Oke J, Barnett AH, Davidson MB, Guerci B, Coates V, Schwedes U, O'Malley S. Meta-analysis of individual patient data in randomised trials of self monitoring of blood glucose in people with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes. BMJ 2012, 344:e486. 10.1136/bmj.e486, 22371867.
38. Eigenmann CA, Colagiuri R, Skinner TC, Trevena L. Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education?. Diabet Med 2009, 26:425-436. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02697.x, 19388974.
39. Majumdar SJ, Johnson JA, Bowker SL, Booth GL, Dolovich L, Ghali W, Harris S, Hux JE, Holbrook A, Lee HN, Toth EL, Yale J. A Canadian consensus for the standardized evaluation of quality improvement interventions in type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes 2005, 29(3):220.
40. Tang TS, Funnell MM, Noorulla S, Oh M, Brown MB. Sustaining short-term improvements over the long-term: results from a 2-year diabetes self-management support (DSMS) intervention. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012, 95:85-92. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.04.003, 3783218, 21872962.
41. Wangberg SC. An Internet-based diabetes self-care intervention tailored to self-efficacy. Health Educ Res 2008, 23:170-179.
42. Lee H, Ahn S, Kim Y. Self-care, self-efficacy, and glycemic control of Koreans with diabetes mellitus. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2009, 3:139-146.
43. Tugwell P, de Savigny D, Hawker G, Robinson V. Applying clinical epidemiological methods to health equity: the equity effectiveness loop. BMJ 2006, 332:358-361. doi:10.1136/bmj.7537.358, 10.1136/bmj.332.7537.358, 1363922, 16470062.
44. Rothwell PM. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet 2005, 365:176-186. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17709-5, 15639301.
45. Salize HJ, Kilian R. Gesundheitsökonomie in der Psychiatrie: Konzepte, Methoden, Analysen 2010, Kohlhammer: Stuttgart, Germany, 1.
46. Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS, Polsky D. Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials 2007, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Carpenter J, Bithell J. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 2000, 19:1141-1164. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000515)19:9<1141::AID-SIM479>3.0.CO;2-F, 10797513.
48. Löthgren M, Zethraeus N. Definition, interpretation and calculation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ 2000, 9:623-630. 10.1002/1099-1050(200010)9:7<623::AID-HEC539>3.0.CO;2-V, 11103928.
49. Fenwick E, Marshall DA, Levy AR, Nichol G. Using and interpreting cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of management strategies for atrial fibrillation. BMC Health Serv Res 2006, 6:52. 10.1186/1472-6963-6-52, 1538588, 16623946.
50. Hoch JS, Briggs AH, Willan AR. Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ 2002, 11:415-430. 10.1002/hec.678, 12112491.