Prospecting and dispersal: Their eco-evolutionary dynamics and implications for population patterns

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1778, 2014, Pages

  Delgado, M M ^a,b   Barton K A ^c,d   Bonte, D ^e   Travis, J M J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^e GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cost of information; Extinction; Information; Natural selection; Perceptual range; Population dynamics

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DISPERSAL; EXTINCTION; FITNESS; MORTALITY; MOVEMENT; NATURAL SELECTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE COST;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISPERSAL; ARTICLE; COST OF INFORMATION; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; EXTINCTION; GENETIC SELECTION; INFORMATION; NATURAL SELECTION; PERCEPTUAL RANGE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES EXTINCTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COST OF INFORMATION; EXTINCTION; INFORMATION; NATURAL SELECTION; PERCEPTUAL RANGE; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMAL DISTRIBUTION; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84902687957     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2851     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Hamilton WD, May RM. 1977 Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature 269, 578-581. (doi:10.1038/ 269578a0)
2. Johnson ML, Gaines MS. 1990 Evolution of dispersal-theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 449-480. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.21.1.449)
3. Cadet C, Ferriere R, Metz JAJ, van Baalen M. 2003 The evolution of dispersal under demographic stochasticity. Am. Nat. 162, 427-441. (doi:10.1086/ 378213)
4. Kun A, Scheuring I. 2006 The evolution of densitydependent dispersal in a noisy spatial population model. Oikos 115, 308-320. (doi:10.1111/j.2006. 0030-1299.15061.x)
5. Reed JM, Boulinier T, Danchin E, Oring LW. 1999 Informed dispersal: prospecting by birds for breeding site. Curr. Ornithol. 15, 189-259. (doi:10. 1007/978-1-4757-4901-4_5)
6. Baker MB, Rao S. 2004 Incremental costs and benefits shape natal dispersal: theory and example with Hemilepistus reaumuri. Ecology 85, 1039-1051. (doi:10.1890/02-0507)
7. Schmidt KA, Dall SRX, van Gils JA. 2010 The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions. Oikos 119, 304-316. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17573.x)
8. Travis JMJ et al. 2012 Modelling dispersal: an ecoevolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved. Method Ecol. Evol. 3, 628-641. (doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00193.x)
9. Bowler DE, Benton TG. 2005 Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 80, 205-225. (doi:10.1017/s1464793104006645)
10. Hovestadt T, Kubisch A, Poethke HJ. 2010 Information processing in models for densitydependent emigration: a comparison. Ecol. Model. 221, 405-410. (doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.11.005)
11. Clobert J, Le Galliard JF, Cote J, Meylan S, Massot M. 2009 Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol. Lett. 12, 197-209. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01267.x)
12. Bonte D et al. 2012 Costs of dispersal. Biol. Rev. 87, 290-312. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00201.x)
13. Ruxton GD, Rohani P. 1999 Fitness-dependent dispersal in metapopulations and its consequences for persistence and synchrony. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 530-539. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00300.x)
14. Poethke HJ, Hovestadt T. 2002 Evolution of densityand patch-size-dependent dispersal rates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 637-645. (doi:10.1098/ rspb.2001.1936)
15. Travis JMJ, Murrell DJ, Dytham C. 1999 The evolution of density-dependent dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1837-1842. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0854)
16. Fletcher RJ. 2006 Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat. 168, 207-219. (doi:10.1086/505764)
17. Schjorring S. 2002 The evolution of informed natal dispersal: inherent versus acquired information. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 227-238.
18. Enfjäll K, Leimar O. 2009 The evolution of dispersal-the importance of information about population density and habitat characteristics. Oikos 118, 291-299. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16863.x)
19. Bocedi G, Heinonen J, Travis JMJ. 2012 Uncertainty and the role of information acquisition in the evolution of context-dependent emigration. Am. Nat. 179, 606-620. (doi:10.1086/665004)
20. Delgado MD, Ratikainen II, Kokko H. 2011 Inertia: the discrepancy between individual and common good in dispersal and prospecting behaviour. Biol. Rev. 86, 717-732. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00167.x)
21. Boulinier T, Danchin E. 1997 The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in terrestrial migratory species. Evol. Ecol. 11, 505-517. (doi:10.1007/s10682-997-1507-0)
22. Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Templeton JJ. 2002 Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1559-1566. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1065).
23. Olivieri I, Gouyon P-H. 1997 Evolution of migration rate and other traits. In Metapopulation biology (eds I Hanski, ME Gilpin), pp. 293-324. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Vuilleumier S, Perrin N. 2006 Effects of cognitive abilities on metapopulation connectivity. Oikos 113, 139-147. (doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14405.x)
25. R Development Core Team. 2009 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
26. Comins HN, Hamilton WD, May RM. 1980 Evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies. J. Theor. Biol. 82, 205-230. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(80)90099-5)
27. Lindenmayer DB, Possingham HP. 1996 Modelling the inter-relationships between habitat patchiness, dispersal capability and metapopulation persistence of the endangered species, Leadbeater's possum, in south-eastern Australia. Landsc. Ecol. 11, 79-105. (doi:10.1007/bf02093741)
28. Heino M, Hanski I. 2001 Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Am. Nat. 157, 495-511. (doi:10.1086/319927)
29. Poethke HJ, Gros A, Hovestadt T. 2011 The ability of individuals to assess population density influences the evolution of emigration propensity and dispersal distance. J. Theor. Biol. 282, 93-99. (doi:10.1016/j. jtbi.2011.05.012)
30. Barton KA, Phillips BL, Morales JM, Travis JMJ. 2009 The evolution of an 'intelligent' dispersal strategy: biased, correlated random walks in patchy landscapes. Oikos 118, 309-319. (doi:10.1111/j. 1600-0706.2008.16936.x)
31. Dall SRX, Cuthill IC. 1997 The information costs of generalism. Oikos 80, 197-202. (doi:10.2307/ 3546535)
32. McNamara JM, Dall SRX. 2010 Information is a fitness enhancing resource. Oikos 119, 231-236. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17509.x)
33. Dall SRX, Giraldeau LA, Olsson O, McNamara JM, Stephens DW. 2005 Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 187-193. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010)
34. Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Wagner RH. 2004 Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305, 487-491. (doi:10. 1126/science.1098254)
35. Bonnie KE, Earley RL. 2007 Expanding the scope for social information use. Anim. Behav. 74, 171-181. (doi:10.1016/i.anbehav.2006.12.009)
36. Seppänen JT, Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M, Thomson RL. 2007 Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 88, 2950. (doi:10.1890/06-1757.1)
37. Zollner PA, Lima SL. 1997 Landscape-level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice: perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat. Oikos 80, 51-60. (doi:10.2307/3546515)
38. Nams VO. 2006 Detecting oriented movement of animals. Anim. Behav. 72, 1197-1203. (doi:10. 1016/j.anbehav.2006.04.005)
39. Olden JD, Schooley RL, Monroe JB, Poff NL. 2004 Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes. J. Anim. Ecol. 73, 1190-1194. (doi:10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00889.x)
40. Gilroy JJ, Sutherland WJ. 2007 Beyond ecological traps: perceptual errors and undervalued resources. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 351-356. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.014)
41. Serrano D, Tella JL, Donazar JA, Pomarol M. 2003 Social and individual features affecting natal dispersal in the colonial lesser kestrel. Ecology 84, 3044-3054. (doi:10.1890/02-0231)
42. Wiens JA. 2001 The landscape context of dispersal. In Dispersal: individual, population, and community (eds J Clobert, E Danchin, AA Dhondt, JD Nichols), pp. 96-109. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Schooley RL, Wiens JA. 2003 Finding habitat patches and directional connectivity. Oikos 102, 559-570. (doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12490.x)
44. Pe'er G, Kramer-Schadt S. 2008 Incorporating the perceptual range of animals into connectivity models. Ecol. Model. 213, 73-85. (doi:10.1016/j. ecolmodel.2007.11.020)