Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems

Information Polity

Volumn 19, Issue 1-2, 2014, Pages 17-33

  Zuiderwijk, Anneke ^a   Janssen, Marijn ^a   Davis, Chris ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

architecture; ecosystem; infrastructure; innovation; open data; Open data ecosystem; open government

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902484892     PISSN: 15701255     EISSN: 18758754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/IP-140329     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. J. Zhang S. Dawes and J. Sarkis Exploring Stakeholders' Expectations of the Benefits and Barriers of E-Government Knowledge Sharing Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18 (2005) 548-567.
2. S. Dawes and N. Helbig Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency presented at the 9th International Conference on e-government (EGOV) Lausanne Switzerland 2010.
3. J.C. Bertot P.T. Jaeger and J.M. Grimes Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies Government Information Quarterly 27 (2010) 264-271.
4. C.P. Geiger and J.V. Lucke Open Government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data) Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government 4 (2012) 265-278.
5. M.T. Borzacchiello and M. Craglia The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: A research strategy International Journal of Technology Management 60 (2012) 114-129.
6. P. McDermott Building Open Government Government Information Quarterly 27 (2010) 401-413.
7. K. Braunschweig J. Eberius M. Thiele and W. Lehner The State of Open Data. Limits of Current Open Data Platforms presented at the International World Wide Web Conference Lyon France 2012.
8. European Commission. (2012 January 8). Data portal. The Open Data Hub of the European Union. Available: http://open-data.europa.eu/open-data/.
9. The ENGAGE project. (2014 February 28). ENGAGE. Available: www.engagedata.eu.
10. Junar. (2009 January 8). Junar. The open data platform. Available: http://www.junar.com/.
11. European Commission. (2013 January 8). Eurostat. Your key to European statistics. Available: http://epp.eurostat.ec. europa.eu/portal/page/portal/ eurostat/home.
12. M. Janssen S.A. Chun and J.R. Gil-Garcia Building the next generation of digital government infrastructures Government Information Quarterly 26 (2009) 233-237.
13. Open Refine. (2013 October 11). OpenRefine. A free open source power tool for working with messy data. Available: http://openrefine.org/.
14. ScraperWiki. (2013 October 11). ScraperWiki. Available: https://scraperwiki.com/.
15. B. Ubaldi Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives OECD2013.
16. T.M. Harrison T.A. Pardo and M. Cook Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda Future Internet 4 (2012) 900-928.
17. R. Pollock. (2011 September 13). Building the (Open) Data Ecosystem. Available: http://blog.okfn.org/2011/03/31/building-the-open-data-ecosystem/.
18. M. Vander Sande A. Dimou P. Colpaert E. Mannens and R. Van de Walle Linked Data as enabler for Open Data Ecosystems presented at the Open Data Week 2013 (ODW13) 2013.
19. W. Hall N. Shadbolt T. Tiropanis K. O'Hara and T. Davies Open data and charities. A state of the art review Nominet Trust Oxford 2012.
20. A. Poikola P. Kola and K.A. Hintikka Public data. An introduction to opening information sources Ministry of Transport and Communications Helsinki Finland2011.
21. S.-A. Sansone P. Rocca-Serra D. Field E.Maguire C. Taylor O. Hofmann et al. Toward interoperable bioscience data Nature Genetics 44 (2012) 121-126.
22. T. Davies Open Data: Infrastructures and ecosystems presented at the ACM Web Science Conference 2012 Evanston Illinois 2012.
23. T. Davies and D. Edwards Emerging Implications of Open and Linked Data for Knowledge Sharing in Development IDS Bulletin 43 (2012) 117-127.
24. J.M. Carroll Five Reasons for Scenario-Based Design presented at the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS),Wailea Maui Hawaii 1999.
25. C. Potts Using schematic scenarios to understand user needs presented at the Proceedings of the 1st conference on Designing interactive systems: processes practices methods & techniques Ann Arbor Michigan USA 1995.
26. Y.-K. Lim and K. Sato Scenarios for Usability Evaluation: Using Design Information Framework and a Task Analysis Approach in The Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association 15th Technical Congress 2003.
27. Statistics Netherlands (CBS). (2013 September 13). StatLine Database. Available: http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/cijfers/statline/zelf-tabellen-maken/ default.htmLanguageswitch=on.
28. K. Möller Lifecycle models of data-centric systems and domains. The abstract data lifecycle model Semantic Web 4 (2013) 67-88.
29. A. Zuiderwijk M. Janssen S. Choenni R. Meijer and R. Sheikh Alibaks Socio-technical impediments of open data Electronic Journal of eGovernment 10 (2012) 156-172.
30. L. Ding T. Lebo J.S. Erickson D. DiFranzo G.T.Williams X. Li et al. TWC LOGD: A portal for linked open government data ecosystems Web Semantics: Science Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 9 (2011) 325-333.
31. R. Wirth and J. Hipp CRISP-DM: Towards a standard process model for data mining in 4th International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2000 pp. 29-39.
32. B.J. Fry (2004 March 16). Computational Information Design. Available: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/26913.
33. P. Pirolli and S. Card The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis in International Conference on Intelligence Analysis 2005 pp. 2-4.
34. R. Adner and R. Kapoor Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations Strategic Management Journal 31 (2010) 306-333.
35. M. Iansiti and R. Levien The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy Innovation and Sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press 2004
36. R.P. Bostrom and J.S. Heinen MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. Part I: The causes MIS Quarterly 1 (1977) 17-32.
37. G. Vonk and A. Ligtenberg Socio-technical PSS development to improve functionality and usability-Sketch planning using a Maptable Landscape and Urban Planning 94 (2010) 166-174.
38. A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen Barriers and development directions for the publication and usage of open data: A sociotechnical view in: Open Government. Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance M. Gascó- Hernández Ed. ed New York: Springer 2014 pp. 115-135.
39. T.M. Koontz and J. Bodine Implementing Ecosystem Management in Public Agencies: Lessons from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service Conservation Biology 22 (2008) 60-69.
40. G. Evans Implementing E-government: An Executive Report for Civil Servants and Their Advisors. Burlington U.S.A.: Gower Publishing Limited 2003.
41. R. Adner Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem Harvard Business Review 84 (2006) 98-107.
42. J.F. Moore The Death of Competition-Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems New York: Harper Business 1996.
43. L. Pierce Big losses in ecosystem niches: How core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts Strategic Management Journal 30 (2009) 323-347.
44. T. Obi and N. Iwasaki Electronic governance benchmarking: Waseda University e-gov ranking presented at the Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance Beijing China 2010.
45. B.A. Nardi and V.L. O'Day Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart Cambridge MA USA: MIT Press 1999.
46. L. Weizhang and Z. Jiefang Development of E-Government from Information Ecology View: A Literature Review in E-Business and E-Government (ICEE) 2010 International Conference on 2010 pp. 476-479.
47. M.L. Brodie Data Integration at Scale: From Relational Data Integration to Information Ecosystems presented at the 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications 2010.
48. A.B.H.S. Mhamdia Performance measurement practices in software ecosystem International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 62 (2013) 514-533.
49. M. Hadzic and A. Sidhu Digital health ecosystems in 2nd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies 2008.
50. G. Briscoe and P. De Wilde Digital ecosystems: evolving service-orientated architectures presented at the First international conference on Bio inspired models of network information and computing systems 2006.
51. L. Abrahams Innovation in monitoring and evaluation for e-development and transformational government.
52. T. Obi E-Government Developments Journal of e-Government Policy and Regulation 32 (2009) 136-187.
53. A. Halonen Being Open About Data. Analysis of the UK open data policies and applicability of open data The Finnish Institute London United Kingdom 2012.
54. L. Ding V. Peristeras M. Hausenblas Linked Open Government Data L. Ding V. Peristeras and M. Hausenblas Linked Open Government Data [Guest editors' introduction] Intelligent Systems IEEE 27 2012 11-15.
55. A. Yaeli H. Ship C. Alexopoulos V. Pterneas and N. Gaberlo Deliverable D7.7.3. Data and knowledge annotation and linking methods 2012.
56. T. Berners-Lee. (2009 October 11). Linked data. Available: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
57. A. Zuiderwijk K. Jeffery and M. Janssen The potential of metadata for linked open data and its value for users and publishers Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government 4 (2012) 222-244.
58. S. Dawes Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for Information-Based Transparency Government Information Quarterly 27 (2010) 377-383.
59. K.G. Jeffery Metadata: The future of information systems in: Information Systems Engineering: State of the art and research themes J. Brinkkemper E. Lindencrona and A. Sølvberg eds London: Springer Verlag 2000.