False-positive reduction in mammography using multiscale spatial Weber law descriptor and support vector machines

Neural Computing and Applications

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 83-93

  Hussain, Muhammad ^a  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

False positive reduction; Mammograms; Mass detection; Support vector machines; WLD

Indexed keywords

MAMMOGRAPHY; TEXTURES; X RAY SCREENS;

DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHIES; FALSE-POSITIVE REDUCTION; MAMMOGRAMS; MASS DETECTION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; REGIONS OF INTEREST; TEXTURAL PROPERTIES; WLD;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84902458433     PISSN: 09410643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-013-1450-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Mu T, Nandi AK (2005) Detection of breast cancer using v-SVM and RBF networks with self-organization selection of centers. In: Third IEEE international seminar on medical applications of signal processing.
2. American Cancer Society (2003-2004) Breast cancer: facts and figures. ACS.
3. Esteve J, Kricker A, Ferlay J, Parkin D (1993) Facts and figures of cancer in the European Community. In: Technical report on international agency for research on cancer.
4. Pal NR, Bhowmick B, Patel SK, Pal S, Das J (2008) A multi-stage neural network aided system for detection of micro-calcifications in digitized mammograms. Neurocomputing 71: 2625-2634.
5. Buseman S, Mouchawar J, Calonge N, Byers T (2003) Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 97(2): 352-358.
6. Eurostat (2002) Health statistics atlas on mortality in European Union, European Commission 2002 edition.
7. Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Hoffmeister JW, DeSimio MP (2005) Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology. Cancer 104(5): 931-935.
8. Cheng HD, Cai XP, Chen XW, Hu LM, Lou XL (2003) Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey. Pattern Recognit 36(12): 2967-2991.
9. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KD, Sickles EA (2001) Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219: 192-202.
10. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ (2001) Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220: 781-786.
11. Zwiggelaar R, Astley SM, Boggis CRM, Taylor CJ (2004) Linear structures in mammographic images: detection and classification. IEEE Trans Med Imag 23(9): 1077-1086.
12. Khoo LAL, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM (2005) Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom national breast screening programme: prospective study. Radiology 237(2): 444-449.
13. Nishikawa RM, Kallergi M (2006) Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. Med Phys 33: 811-814.
14. Taylor P, Champness J, Given-Wilson R, Johnston K, Potts H (2005) Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography. Health Tech Assess 9(6): 1-58.
15. Christoyianni I, Koutras A, Dermatas E, Kokkinakis G (2002) Computer aided of breast cancer in digitized mammograms. Comp Med Imag Grap 26: 309-319.
16. Oliver A, Martí J, Martí R, Bosch A, Freixenet J (2006) A new approach to the classification of mammographic masses and normal breast tissue. IAPR Int Conf Pattern Recognit 4: 707-710.
17. Oliver A, Lladó X, Martí J, Martí R, Freixenet J (2007) False positive reduction in breast mass detection using two-dimensional PCA. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4478: 154-161.
18. Yang J, Zhang D, Frangi AF, Yang J (2004) Two-dimensional PCA: a new approach to appearance-based face representation and recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26(1): 131-137.
19. Varela C, Tahoces PG, Méndez AJ, Souto M, Vidal JJ (2007) Computerized detection of breast masses in digitized mammograms. Comput Biol Med 37(2): 214-226.
20. Angelini E, Campanini R, Iampieri E, Lanconelli N, Masotti M, Roffilli M (2006) Testing the performances of different image representations for mass classification in digital mammograms. Int J Mod Phys 17(1): 113-131.
21. Lladó X, Oliver A, Freixenet J, Martí R, Martí J (2009) A textural approach for mass false positive reduction in mammography. Comput Med Imag Graph 33: 415-422.
22. Chen J, Shan S, He C, Zhao G, Pietikainen M, Chen X, Gao W (2010) WLD: A robust local image descriptor. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(9): 1705-1720.
23. Sun Y, Todorovic S, Goodison S (2010) Local-Learning-Based Feature Selection for High-Dimensional Data Analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(9): 1610-1626.
24. Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York.
25. http://www. csie. ntu. edu. tw/~cjlin/libsvm/.
26. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer PJ (2000) The digital database for screening mammography. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 212-218. Toronto, Canada. June 11-14.
27. Jin H, Ling CX (2005) Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(3): 299-310.
28. Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maenpaa T (2002) Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 27(7): 971-987.
29. Fatemeh M, Zohreh A, Reza B, Serajodin K (2010) Contourlet-based mammography mass classification using the SVM family. Comput Biol Med 40(4): 373-383.
30. Hussain M, Khan N (2012) Automatic mass detection in mammograms using multiscale spatial weber local descriptor. In: Proceedings of 19th IEEE IWSSIP 2012, pp. 288-291. Vienna, Austria.