Role of flue gas components in mercury oxidation over TiO2 supported MnOx-CeO2 mixed-oxide at low temperature

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 243, Issue , 2012, Pages 117-123

  Li, Hailong ^a,b,e   Wu, Chang Yu ^b,c   Li, Ying ^d   Li, Liqing ^a   Zhao, Yongchun ^e   Zhang, Junying ^e  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d University of Wisconsin Milwaukee   (United States)

^e HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Ceria; Coal combustion; Flue gas; Manganese oxides; Mercury

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE ADSORPTION; ACTIVE SITE; CHEMISORBED OXYGEN; COAL COMBUSTION FLUE GAS; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; ELEMENTAL MERCURY; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; FLUE GAS COMPONENT; GAS HOURLY SPACE VELOCITIES; GASPHASE; IMPREGNATION METHODS; INHIBITORY EFFECT; LATTICE OXYGEN; LOW RANK COALS; LOW TEMPERATURES; MERCURY OXIDATIONS; SURFACE OXYGEN; TIO;

ADSORPTION; CATALYST ACTIVITY; CERIUM COMPOUNDS; CHEMISORPTION; COAL; COAL COMBUSTION; FLUE GASES; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; MANGANESE; MANGANESE OXIDE; MERCURY (METAL); OXYGEN; SULFUR DIOXIDE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

OXIDATION;

CERIUM OXIDE; COAL; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; MANGANESE OXIDE; MERCURY; NITROGEN OXIDE; OXYGEN; SULFUR DIOXIDE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

CATALYST; CERIUM; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; COMBUSTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LOW TEMPERATURE; MANGANESE OXIDE; MERCURY (ELEMENT); OXIDATION; TITANIUM; WATER VAPOR;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; COMBUSTION; FLUE GAS; LOW TEMPERATURE; OXIDATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS; WATER VAPOR;

AIR POLLUTANTS, OCCUPATIONAL; CATALYSIS; CERIUM; COAL; GASES; MANGANESE COMPOUNDS; MERCURY; NITRIC OXIDE; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; OXIDES; POWER PLANTS; SULFUR DIOXIDE; TEMPERATURE; TITANIUM; ULTRASONICS; WATER;

EID: 84869881498     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mercury study report to congress volume I: executive summary, Washington, DC, December, 1997.
2. Pavlish J.H., Sondreal E.A., Mann M.D., Olson E.S., Galbreath K.C., Laudal D.L., Benson S.A. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Process. Technol. 2003, 82:89-165.
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air toxics standards for utilities, (accessed on 06.05.2012). http://www.epa.gov/airquality/powerplanttoxics/actions.html.
4. Milford J.B., Pienciak A. After the clean air mercury rule: prospects for reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:2669-2673.
5. Galbreath K.C., Zygarlicke C.J. Mercury speciation in coal combustion and gasification flue gases. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30:2421-2426.
6. Wang S.X., Zhang L., Li G.H., Wu Y., Hao J.M., Pirrone N., Sprovieri F., Ancora M.P. Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10:1183-1192.
7. 3, and HCl on mercury transformations in a 7-kW coal combustion system. Fuel Process.Technol. 2005, 86:429-448.
8. Presto A.A., Granite E.J. Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:5601-5609.
9. Li Y., Murphy P.D., Wu C.Y., Powers K.W., Bonzongo J.C. Development of silica/vanadia/titania catalysts for removal of elemental mercury from coal-combustion flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:5304-5309.
10. 2catalysts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:1522-1527.
11. 3 nanoparticles. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2004, 4:74-90.
12. Yamaguchi A., Akiho H., Ito S. Mercury oxidation by copper oxides in combustion flue gases. Powder Technol. 2008, 180:222-226.
13. 2 supported metal oxide catalysts in coal combustion flue gas. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90:947-951.
14. 3 at lower temperatures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:426-431.
15. x and elemental mercury from flue gas. Energy Fuels 2008, 22:2299-2306.
16. Zhao Y.X., Mann M.D., Pavlish J.H., Mibeck B.A.F., Dunham G.E., Olson E.S. Application of gold catalyst for mercury oxidation by chlorine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:1603-1608.
17. x/Alumina. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:3317-3322.
18. 2 catalysts by Raman and XPS techniques. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107:5162-5167.
19. 3. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108:15738-15747.
20. 3 at low temperatures. Appl. Catal. B 2004, 51:93-106.
21. 2 catalyst. J. Catal. 2003, 217:434-441.
22. 2 catalyst for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury at low flue gas temperatures. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 111-112:381-388.
23. Lee C.W., Srivastava R.K., Ghorishi S.B., Karwowski J., Hastings T.W., Hirschi J.C. Pilot-scale study of the effect of selective catalytic reduction catalyst on mercury speciation in illinois and powder river basin coal combustion flue gases. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2006, 56:643-649.
24. 5 catalysts in simulated low-rank coal combustion flue gas. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 169:186-193.
25. Zhuang Y., Laumb J., Liggett R., Holmes M., Pavlish J. Impacts of acid gases on mercury oxidation across SCR catalyst. Fuel Process. Technol. 2007, 88:929-934.
26. 2catalysts for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in low-rank coal combustion flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 7394-7400.
27. x with ammonia. Catal. Today 2010, 77-83.
28. Laudal D.L., Thompson J.S., Pavlish J.H., Brickett L., Chu P., Srivastava R.K., Lee C.W., Kilgroe J. Mercury speciation at power plants using SCR and SNCR control technologies,. 3rd International Air Quality Conference 2002.
29. Eswaran S., Stenger H.G. Understanding mercury conversion in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts. Energy Fuels 2005, 19:2328-2334.
30. Cao Y., Chen B., Wu J., Cui H., Smith J., Chen C.K., Chu P., Pan W.P. Study of mercury oxidation by a selective catalytic reduction catalyst in a pilot-scale slipstream reactor at a utility boiler burning bituminous coal. Energy Fuels 2007, 21:145-156.
31. 2 commercial SCR catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:8136-8141.
32. Granite E.J., Pennline H.W., Hargis R.A. Novel sorbents for mercury removal from flue gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39:1020-1029.
33. R.M. Davidson, Chlorine in coal combustion and cofiring, Coal Properties and Analysis CCC/105, 2005, ISBN 92-9029r-r421-3.
34. 2O in predicting oxidation in coal-derived systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35:3701-3706.
35. He S., Zhou J., Zhu Y., Luo Z., Ni M., Cen K. Mercury oxidation over a vanadia-based selective catalytic reduction catalyst. Energy Fuels 2009, 23:253-259.
36. Niksa S., Fujiwara N. A predictive mechanism for mercury oxidation on selective catalytic reduction catalysts under coal-derived flue gas. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55:1866-1875.
37. 2. Energy Fuels 2010, 24:4250-4254.
38. 3 at low temperatures. Appl. Catal. B 1998, 16:327-337.
39. 3. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113:4426-4432.
40. 3 at low temperature. Catal. Commun. 2009, 10:935-939.
41. 3: a comparative study. Chemosphere 2010, 78:1160-1166.