Eremophila glabra reduces methane production and methanogen populations when fermented in a Rusitec

Anaerobe

Volumn 29, Issue , 2014, Pages 100-107

  Li, XiXi ^a   Durmic, Zoey ^a   Liu, ShiMin ^a   McSweeney, Chris S ^b   Vercoe, Philip E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cellulolytic bacteria; Eremophila glabra; Methane; Methanogens; QRT PCR; RUSITEC

Indexed keywords

METHANE; METHYL COENZYME M REDUCTASE A; OXIDOREDUCTASE; RNA 16S; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VOLATILE FATTY ACID; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; METHYL COENZYME M REDUCTASE;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARCHAEON; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; BIOMASS; CONTINUOUS CULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EREMOPHILA (ANGIOSPERM); EREMOPHILA GLABRA; FERMENTATION; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; GENE DOSAGE; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; METHANOGEN; METHANOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RUMINANT STOMACH; RUMINOCOCCUS ALBUS; SCROPHULARIACEAE; SHRUB; ANIMAL; BATCH CELL CULTURE; BIOREACTOR; BIOSYNTHESIS; BOVIDS; EURYARCHAEOTA; FIBROBACTER; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM; MICROBIOLOGY; OAT; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; RUMINOCOCCUS; TEMPERATURE;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EREMOPHILA GLABRA; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; RUMINOCOCCUS ALBUS; SCROPHULARIACEAE;

ANIMALS; AVENA SATIVA; BATCH CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOREACTORS; EREMOPHILA PLANT; EURYARCHAEOTA; FERMENTATION; FIBROBACTER; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; METHANE; MICROBIAL CONSORTIA; OXIDOREDUCTASES; PRESSURE; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN; RUMINANTS; RUMINOCOCCUS; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84902385886     PISSN: 10759964     EISSN: 10958274     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. DCC The Australian national greenhouse accounts DCC 2009, Department of Climate Change, Canberra.
2. Demeyer D.I., Van Nevel C.J. Methanogenesis, an integrated part of carbohydrate fermentation, and its control. Digestion and metabolism in the ruminant 1975, 366-382. The University of New England Publishing Unit, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia. I.W. McDonald, A.C.I. Warner (Eds.).
3. Hungate R.E. The rumen and its microbes 1966, Academic Press Inc, New York.
4. Moss A.R., Jouany J.P., Newbold J. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann Zootech 2000, 49(3):231-253.
5. Wolin M., Miller T. Interspecies hydrogen transfer: 15 years later. ASM News 1982, 48(12):561-565.
6. Hegarty R.S., Gerdes R. Hydrogen production and transfer in the rumen. Recent Adv Anim Nutr Aust 1999, 12:37-44.
7. Wallace R.J., McEwan N.R., McIntosh F.M., Teferedegne B., Newbold C.J. Natural products as manipulators of rumen fermentation. Asian Austral J Anim 2002, 15(10):1458-1468.
8. García-González R., López S., Fernández M., Bodas R., González J.S. Screening the activity of plants and spices for decreasing ruminal methane production invitro. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008, 147(1-3):36-52.
9. García-González R., López S., Fernández M., González J.S. Dose-response effects of Rheum officinale root and Frangula alnus bark on ruminal methane production invitro. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008, 145(1-4):319-334.
10. Bodas R., Lopez S., Fernandez M., Garcia-Gonzalez R., Rodriguez A.B., Wallace R.J., et al. Invitro screening of the potential of numerous plant species as antimethanogenic feed additives for ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008, 145(1-4):245-258.
11. Patra A.K., Kamra D.N., Agarwal N. Effect of plant extracts on invitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffalo. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006, 128(3-4):276-291.
12. Vercoe P.E., Durmic Z., Revell D.K. Rumen microbial ecology: helping to change landscapes. Cahiers Options Mediterr 2009, 85:225-236.
13. Mitchell A.A., Wilcox D.G., Laidlaw E. Plants of the arid shrublands of Western Australia 1988, University of Western Australia Press with the Western Australia Dept. of Agriculture Perth, Nedlands, W.A.
14. Durmic Z., Hutton P., Revell D.K., Emms J., Hughes S., Vercoe P.E. Invitro fermentative traits of Australian woody perennial plant species that may be considered as potential sources of feed for grazing ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2010, 160(3-4):98-109.
15. Hutton P., White C.L., Durmic Z., Vercoe P.E. Eremophila glabra is an Australian plant that reduces lactic acid accumulation in an invitro glucose challenge designed to simulate lactic acidosis in ruminants. Animal 2009, 3:1254-1263.
16. Hutton P.G., Durmic Z., Ghisalberti E.L., Flematti G.R., Duncan R.M., Carson C.F., et al. Inhibition of ruminal bacteria involved in lactic acid metabolism by extracts from Australian plants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012, 176(1-4):170-177.
17. Hutton P.G., Durmic Z., Vercoe P.E. Investigating Eremophila glabra as a bioactive agent for preventing lactic acidosis in sheep. Anim Prod Sci 2010, 50(5-6):449-453.
18. Li X., Durmic Z., Liu S.M., Vercoe P.E. Eremophila glabra and Kennedia prorepens reduces methane emission from Medicago sativa invitro. 28th Australian Society of Animal Production, Armidale, NSW, Australia 2010, 67.
19. Revell C.K., Revell D.K. Meeting 'duty of care' obligations when developing new pasture species. Field Crops Res 2007, 104:95-102.
20. Czerkawski J.W., Breckenridge G. Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br J Nutr 1977, 38(3):371-384.
21. McDougall E.I. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochem J 1948, 43(1):99-109.
22. Zadorojny C., Saxton S., Finger R. Spectrophotometric determination of ammonia. JWater Pollut Control Fed 1973, 45(5):905-912.
23. Denman S.E., McSweeney C.S. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2006, 58(3):572-582.
24. Denman S.E., Tomkins N., McSweeney C.S. Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2007, 62(3):313-322.
25. Kurihara M., Magner T., Hunter R.A., McCrabb G.J. Methane production and energy partition of cattle in the tropics. Br J Nutr 1999, 81:227-234.
26. DeRamus H.A., Clement T.C., Giampola D.D., Dickison P.C. Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages. JEnviron Qual 2003, 32(1):269-277.
27. Kennedy P.M., Charmley E. Methane yields from Brahman cattle fed tropical grasses and legumes. Anim Prod Sci 2012, 52(4):225-239.
28. Soliva C.R., Zeleke A.B., Clément C., Hess H.D., Fievez V., Kreuzer M. Invitro screening of various tropical foliages, seeds, fruits and medicinal plants for low methane and high ammonia generating potentials in the rumen. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008, 147(1-3):53-71.
29. Busquet M., Calsamiglia S., Ferret A., Kamel C. Screening for effects of plant extracts and active compounds of plants on dairy cattle rumen microbial fermentation in a continuous culture system. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005, 123-124(2(0)):597-613.
30. Cardozo P.W., Calsamiglia S., Ferret A., Kamel C. Screening for the effects of natural plant extracts at two pH levels on invitro rumen microbial fermentation of a high-concentrate beef cattle diet. JAnim Sci 2005, 83:49-50.
31. García-González R., González J.S., López S. Decrease of ruminal methane production in Rusitec fermenters through the addition of plant material from rhubarb (Rheum spp.) and alder buckthorn (Frangula alnus). JDairy Sci 2010, 93(8):3755-3763.
32. Li X., Raphalen C., Durmic Z., Liu S., Vercoe P.E. Supplementation of substrate with Eremophila glabra reduced methane production in invitro fermentation. Proceedings of the 15th Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) animal science congress 2012, 86.
33. Zhou Z.M., Meng Q.X., Yu Z.T. Effects of methanogenic inhibitors on methane production and abundances of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in invitro ruminal cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77(8):2634-2639.
34. 4 production in Swedish dairy cows fed different levels of forage. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012, 78(17):6172-6179.
35. Wright A.D., Kennedy P., O'Neill C.J., Toovey A.F., Popovski S., Rea S.M., et al. Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens. Vaccine 2004, 22(29-30):3976-3985.
36. Wolin M.J. Atheoretical rumen fermentation balance. JDairy Sci 1960, 43(10):1452-1459.
37. Wallace R.J., Czerkawski J.W., Breckenridge G. Effect of monensin on the fermentation of basal rations in the rumen-simulation-technique (Rusitec). Br J Nutr 1981, 46(1):131-148.
38. Hutton P., Durmic Z., Gishalberti E., Duncan R., Carson C.F., Riley T.V., et al. Brief communication: bioactive plants inhibit bacteria that cause lactic acidosis in ruminants. Proc N Z Soc Anim Prod 2009, 69:230-232.
39. Gokarn R.R., Eiteman M.A., Martin S.A., Eriksson K.E.L. Production of succinate from glucose, cellobiose, and various cellulosic materials by the ruminai anaerobic bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1997, 68(1-2):69-80.
40. Krause D.O., Denman S.E., Mackie R.I., Morrison M., Rae A.L., Attwood G.T., et al. Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2003, 27(5):663-693.
41. Forsberg C.W., Cheng K.J., White B.A. Polysaccharide degradation in the rumen and large intestine. Gastrointestinal micro-biology 1997, 319-379. Chapman and Hall, New York. R.I. Mackie, B.A. White (Eds.).
42. Rodríguez R., Britos A., Rodríguez-Romero N., Fondevila M. Effect of plant extracts from several tanniferous browse legumes on invitro microbial fermentation of the tropical grass Pennisetum purpureum. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011, 168(3-4):188-195.
43. Goiri I., Oregui L.M., Garcia-Rodriguez A. Dose-response effects of chitosans on invitro rumen digestion and fermentation of mixtures differing in forage-to-concentrate ratios. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009, 151(3-4):215-227.
44. Michalet-Doreau B., Fernandez I., Peyron C., Millet L., Fonty G. Fibrolytic activities and cellulolytic bacterial community structure in the solid and liquid phases of rumen contents. Reprod Nutr Dev 2001, 41(2):187-194.