Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with electronic clinical data: A perspective from the EDM forum

Medical Care

Volumn 50, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Holve, Erin ^a   Segal, Courtney ^a   Hamilton Lopez, Marianne ^a  

^a ACADEMYHEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative effectiveness research; Learning health care system; Scalability; Stakeholder; Sustainability; Transdisciplinary

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CODING; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NATURALISTIC INQUIRY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPRING;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY;

EID: 84862289258     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: 15371948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318258530f     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Nicolescu B. Transdisciplinarity-Theory and Practice. Cresskil, NJ: Hampton Press; 2008.
2. AHRQ Health Care Innovations Exchange. Adoption of Rapid Cycle Improvement Process From Toyota Increases Efficiency and Productivity at Community Health Clinics. April 14, 2008. Available at: http://www.innovations. ahrq.gov/content.aspx?id = 1807. Accessed March 8, 2012.
3. Patton MG. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2002:431-440.
4. HMO Research Network. HMO Research Network (HMORN). HMORN web site. 2012. Available at: http://www.hmoresearchnetwork. org/. Accessed March 8, 2012.
5. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Beyond the HIPAA Privacy Rule: Enhancing Privacy, Improving Health Through Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1991:199-244.
6. Sittig DF, Hazlehurst BL, Brown J, et al. A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogeneous clinical data. Med Care. 2012; 50(suppl 1):S49-S59.
7. Hamilton Lopez M, Nagda SR, Holve E, et al. Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Clinical Informatics: An Annotated Bibliography. AcademyHealth. 2011(EDM Forum Report). Available at: http://www.edm-forum.org/ publicgrant/Publications/AnnotatedBiblio graphy. Accessed March 8, 2012.
8. Murphy SN, Weber G, Mendis M, et al. Serving the enterprise and beyond with informatics for integrating biology and the bedside (i2b2). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:124-130.
9. Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute. PopMedNet. 2010. Available at: http://www.popmednet.org/Home.aspx. Accessed March 8, 2012.
10. Hastings S, Oster S, Langella S, et al. Adoption and Adaptation of caGrid for CTSA. Summit on Translat Bioinforma. 2009;2009:44-48.
11. Microsoft. Microsoft Amalga. 2011. Available at: http://www.micro soft.com/en-us/microsofthealth/products/microsoft-amalga.aspx. Accessed March 8, 2012.
12. Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research. About CER Hub [CER Hub website]. 2011. Available at: https://www.cerhub.org/index.html.
13. Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership [OMOP website]. 2011. Available at: http://omop.fnih.org/. Accessed March 8, 2012.
14. Pathak J, Solbrig HR, Buntrock JD, et al. LexGrid: a framework for representing, storing, and querying biomedical terminologies from simple to sublime. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:305-315.
15. James B. Information system concepts for quality measurement. Med Care. 2003;41(suppl 1):171-179.
16. Brennan PF, Stead WW. Assessing data quality: from concordance, through correctness and completeness, to valid manipulatable representations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:106-107. (Pubitemid 30041736)
17. Wang R, Kon H, Madnick S. Data Quality Requirements Analysis and Modelling. Ninth International Conference of Data Engineering, 1993.
18. Kahn MG, Raebel MA, Glanz JM, et al. A pragmatic framework for single-site and multi-site data quality assessment in electronic health recordbased clinical research. Med Care. 2012;50(suppl 1):S21-S29.
19. Olsen LA, Aisner D, McGinnis JM, eds. Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine. National Academies Press: Washington, DC. 2007:37-80.
20. Diamond CC, Mostashari F, Shirky C. Collecting and sharing data for population health: a new paradigm. Health Aff. 2009;28:454-466.
21. Rosenbaum S. Data governance and stewardship: designing data stewardship entities and advancing data access. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:1442-1455.
22. Brown JS, Holmes JH, Shah K, et al. Distributed health data networks: a practical and preferred approach to multi-institutional evaluations of comparative effectiveness, safety, and quality of care. Med Care. 2010;48(6 Suppl):S45-551.
23. D'Avolio LW, Farwell WR, Fiore LD. Comparative effectiveness research and medical informatics. Am J Med. 2010;123(12 Suppl 1): e32-37.
24. Pace WD, Cifuentes M, Valuck RJ, et al. An electronic practice-based network for observational comparative effectiveness research. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:338-340.
25. Abernethy AP, Etheredge LM, Ganz PA, et al. Rapid-learning system for cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4268-4274.
26. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: a User's Guide. Rockville, MD: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.
27. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Working Definition of 'Patient-Centered Outcomes Research' [PCORI definition web page]. 2011. Available at: http://www.pcori.org/assets/Summary-of-PCORDefinition-Input- Opportunity-.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2012.
28. HRN. HMORN. Virtual Data Warehouse (VDW). Collaboration Toolkit: A guide to multicenter research in the HMO Research Network. 2011;16-20.