Direct republicanism in the administrative process

George Washington Law Review

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1458-1528

  Arkush, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902370363     PISSN: 00168076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. See JAMES O. FREEDMAN, CRISIS AND LEGITIMACY: THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS AND AMERICAN GOVERNMENT 6-14 (1978
2. Gerald E. Frug, The Ideology of Bureaucracy in American Law, 97 HARV. L. REV. 1276, 1279-80 (1984
3. Mark Seidenfeld, A Civic Republican Justification for the Bureaucratic State, 105 HARV. L. REV. 1511, 1513 (1992
4. Richard B. Stewart, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 HARV. L. REV. 1667, 1678-80 (1975
5. Paul H. Brietzke, Book Review, 14 VAL. U. L. REV. 361, 362-65 (1980
6. Thomas O. Sargentich, The Reform of the American Administrative Process: The Contemporary Debate, 1984 WIS. L. REV. 385, 393.
7. Cass R. Sunstein, Factions, Self-Interest, and the APA: Four Lessons Since 1946, 72 VA. L. REV. 271, 271 (1986
8. See, e.g., Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010
9. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/ remarks-president-state-union-address
10. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/sap/112/ saphr3010r-20111129.pdf;
11. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/sap/112/ saphr4078r-20120723.pdf.
12. see also David Arkush, Democracy and Administrative Legitimacy, 47 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 611 (2012
13. Ronald F. Wright, Why Not Administrative Grand Juries?, 44 ADMIN. L. REV. 465, 512-14 (1992
14. David Fontana, Reforming the Administrative Procedure Act: Democracy Index Rulemaking, 74 FORDHAM L. REV. 81, 82-83 (2005
15. See David J. Arkush, Situating Emotion: A Critical Realist View of Emotion and Nonconscious Cognitive Processes for Law and Legal Theory, 2008 BYU L. REV. 1275, 1365 [
16. Cary Coglianese, The Internet and Citizen Participation in Rulemaking, 1 I/S: J.L. & POL'Y 33, 44 (2005
17. Jerry Frug, Administrative Democracy, 40 U. TORONTO L.J. 559, 573 (1990
18. Cf. SIDNEY A. SHAPIRO & ROBERT L. GLICKSMAN, RISK REGULATION AT RISK: RESTORING A PRAGMATIC APPROACH 18 (2003
19. Frank Michelman, Bringing the Law to Life: A Pleafor Disenchantment, 74 CORNELL L. REV. 256, 258 (1989)
20. Sidney Shapiro, Pragmatic Administrative Law, 5 ISSUES IN LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP, Mar. 2005, at 4, available at http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ils. 2005.5.issue-1/ils.2005.5.1.1057/ils.2005.5.1.1057.xml?format=INT
21. See Elena Kagan, Presidential Administration, 114 HARV. L. REV. 2245, 2256 (2001
22. Gary Lawson, The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State, 107 HARV. L. REV. 1231, 1237-41 (1994
23. Cf. Sidney A. Shapiro, Administrative Law After the Counter-Reformation: Restoring Faith in Pragmatic Government, 48 U. KAN. L. REV. 689, 691 (2000
24. See JAMES T. KLOPPENBERG, THE VIRTUES OF LIBERALISM 106-07 (1998
25. Richard B. Stewart, Administrative Law in the Twenty-First Century, 78 N.Y.U. L. REV. 437, 443 (2003
26. Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Response, Presidential Control Is Better Than the Alternatives, 88 TEX. L. REV. See Also 113 (2009
27. http://www.texaslrev.com/wp-content/uploads/Pierce-88-TLRSA-113.pdf;
28. see also Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Democratizing the Administrative State, 48 WM. & MARY L. REV. 559, 562-65 (2006
29. http://www.osha.gov/as/opa/osha35yearmilestones.html (last visited Aug. 6, 2013
30. See, e.g., Symposium, The Republican Civic Tradition, 97 YALE L.J. 1493-1851 (1988
31. See, e.g., JOSHUA COHEN, PHILOSOPHY, POLITICS, DEMOCRACY 16 (2009
32. Joseph M. Bessette, Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government, in HOW DEMOCRATIC IS THE CONSTITUTION? 102, 104 (Robert A. Goldwin & William A. Schambra eds., 1980
33. See, e.g., Cass R. Sunstein, Cognition and Cost-Benefit Analysis, 29 J. LEGAL STUD. 1059, 1092-93 (2000
34. See generally Orly Lobel, The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought, 89 MINN. L. REV. 342 (2004
35. Charles Sabel, Archon Fung & Bradley Karkkainen, Beyond Backyard Environmentalism: How Communities Are Quietly Refashioning Environmental Regulation, BOSTON REV., Oct.-Nov. 1999.
36. See, e.g., IAN AYRES & JOHN BRAITHWAITE, RESPONSIVE REGULATION: TRANSCENDING THE DEREGULATION DEBATE 4 (1992) ("responsive regulation"
37. Jody Freeman, Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State, 45 UCLA L. REV. 1, 4 (1997
38. Eric W. Orts, Reflexive Environmental Law, 89 NW. U. L. REV. 1227, 1232 (1995
39. http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ils.2005.5.issue-1/ils.2005.5.1.1056/ils. 2005.5.1.1056.xml?format=INT
40. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/circulars/ a004/a-4.pdf
41. See, e.g., Lisa Heinzerling, Regulatory Costs of Mythic Proportions, 107 YALE L.J. 1981, 1983-86 (1998
42. Thomas O. McGarity, Public Participation in Risk Regulation, 1 RISK 103, 103 (1990
43. Richard H. Pildes & Cass R. Sunstein, Reinventing the Regulatory State, 62 U. CHI. L. REV. 1, 8 (1995
44. See, e.g., Wendy E. Wagner, The Science Charade in Toxic Risk Regulation, 95 COLUM. L. REV. 1613, 1674-75 (1995
45. Yvette M. Barksdale, The Presidency and Administrative Value Selection, 42 AM. U. L. REV. 273, 326 (1993
46. Ernest Gellhorn, Public Participation in Administrative Proceedings, 81 YALE L.J. 359, 361-62 (1972
47. JAMES M. LANDIS, REPORT ON REGULATORY AGENCIES TO THE PRESIDENT-ELECT 51 (1960
48. http://bit.ly/landis1960report;
49. see also ROBERT C. FELLMETH, THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE OMISSION 15-16 (1970
50. See, e.g., Steven P. Croley, Theories of Regulation: Incorporating the Administrative Process, 98 COLUM. L. REV. 1, 39-40 (1998
51. See, e.g., Jessica Matthews, Clean Sweeps: Two Success Stories for the Environment, WASH. POST, Dec. 18, 1995, at A23
52. See, e.g., PAUL J. QUIRK, INDUSTRY INFLUENCE IN FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES 19-20 (1981
53. Benjamin W. Heineman, Jr., In Pursuit of the Public Interest, 84 YALE L.J. 182, 188 (1974
54. Wendy E. Wagner, Administrative Law, Filter Failure, and Information Capture, 59 DUKE L.J. 1321, 1325 (2010
55. See Susan Rose-Ackerman, American Administrative Law Under Siege: Is Germany a Model?, 107 HARV. L. REV. 1279, 1279 (1994
56. Thomas O. Sargentich, The Delegation Debate and Competing Ideals of the Administrative Process, 36 AM. U. L. REV. 419, 436 (1987
57. See CASS R. SUNSTEIN, LAWS OF FEAR: BEYOND THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE (2005
58. CASS R. SUNSTEIN, RISK AND REASON: SAFETY, LAW, AND THE ENVIRONMENT (2002
59. CASS. R. SUNSTEIN, WORST-CASE SCENARIOS (2007
60. Cf. Cass R. Sunstein, Interest Groups in American Public Law, 38 STAN. L. REV. 29, 49-50 (1985
61. Richard J. Pierce & Sidney A. Shapiro, Political and Judicial Review of Agency Action, 59 TEX. L. REV. 1175, 1201 (1981
62. Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Role of Constitutional and Political Theory in Administrative Law, 64 TEX. L. REV. 469, 483-84 (1985
63. MICHAEL J. MALBIN, UNELECTED REPRESENTATIVES: CONGRESSIONAL STAFF AND THE FUTURE OF REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT 250-51 (1980
64. See, e.g., COOK POLITICAL REPORT, PARTISAN VOTING INDEX DISTRICTS OF THE 113TH CONGRESS, ARRANGED BY STATE/DISTRICT (2013), available at http://cookpolitical.com/file/2013-04-47.pdf.
65. See, e.g., Jim Cooper, Fixing Congress, BOSTON REV., May-June 2011, at 12, 15-17.
66. RICHARD J. PIERCE, JR., ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE 668 (5th ed. 2010
67. Evan J. Criddle, Fiduciary Administration: Rethinking Popular Representation in Agency Rulemaking, 88 TEX. L. REV. 441, 463 (2010
68. See, e.g., RENA STEINZOR ET AL., CTR. FOR PROGRESSIVE REFORM, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS AT THE WHITE HOUSE: HOW POLITICS TRUMPS PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH, WORKER SAFETY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT 42, 53-54 (2011
69. http://www.progressivereform.org/articles/OIRA-Meetings-1111es.pdf (discussing lack of transparency
70. See, e.g., Amy Sinden, The Economics of Endangered Species: Why Less Is More in the Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designations, 28 HARV. ENVTL. L. REV. 129, 207 (2004
71. Christopher Edley, Jr., The Governance Crisis, Legal Theory, and Political Ideology, 1991 DUKE L.J. 561, 562-63
72. See, e.g., Frank I. Michelman, Foreword, Traces of Self-Government, 100 HARV. L. REV. 4, 74 n.404 (1986
73. Richard J. Pierce, Jr., What Do the Studies of Judicial Review of Agency Actions Mean?, 63 ADMIN. L. REV. 77, 89 (2011
74. Sidney A. Shapiro & Richard E. Levy, Judicial Incentives and Indeterminacy in Substantive Review of Administrative Decisions, 44 DUKE L.J. 1051, 1062-63 (1995
75. David Zaring, Reasonable Agencies, 96 VA. L. REV. 135, 186-87 (2010
76. See, e.g., Nina A. Mendelson, Foreword, Rulemaking, Democracy, and Torrents of EMail, 79 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 1343, 1359-67 (2011
77. http://www.consumerfinance.gov/blog/mortgage-disclosure-is-heating-up/
78. Robert Reich, Public Administration and Public Deliberation: An Interpretive Essay, 94 YALE L.J. 1617, 1632 (1985
79. See Carmen Sirianni, The Tacoma Smelter and EPA, CIVIC PRACTICES NETWORK, http://www.cpn.org/topics/environment/tacoma.html (last visited Aug. 8, 2013
80. ESTHER SCOTT, JOHN F. KENNEDY SCH. OF GOV'T, MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS: THE CASE OF ASARCO 6 (1988
81. David Fontana, Reforming the Administrative Procedure Act: Democracy Index Rulemaking, 74 FORDHAM L. REV. 81, 82 (2005
82. See Marcia R. Gelpe, Citizen Boards as Regulatory Agencies, 22 URB. LAW. 451, 451-54 (1990
83. James L. Price, The Impact of Governing Boards on Organizational Effectiveness and Morale, 8 ADMIN. SCI. Q. 361 (1963
84. See, e.g., CARY COGLIANESE, FEDERAL AGENCY USE OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA IN THE RULEMAKING PROCESS (2011
85. http://mashable.com/2010/07/30/sustainable-online-community/
86. See CAROLYN J. LUKENSMEYER, JOE GOLDMAN & DAVID STERN, IBM CTR. FOR THE BUS. OF GOV'T, ASSESSING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN AN OPEN GOVERNMENT ERA: A REVIEW OF FEDERAL AGENCY PLANS 20 (2011
87. Charles A. Reich, The Law of the Planned Society, 75 YALE L.J. 1227, 1235-36, 1258-61 (1966
88. Cass R. Sunstein, Changing Conceptions of Administration, 1987 BYU L. REV. 927, 941
89. Cf. Jason M. Solomon, The Political Puzzle of the Civil Jury, 61 EMORY L.J. 1331, 1333-36 (2012
90. See Thomas O. McGarity, Some Thoughts on "Deossifying" the Rulemaking Process, 41 DUKE L.J. 1385, 1452 (1992
91. http://cdm16501.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/juries/id/237.
92. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/2011-cb/ 2011-cba-report.pdf.
93. http://www2.epa.gov/planandbudget/budget (last updated June 27, 2013
94. See Cass R. Sunstein, Beyond the Republican Revival, 97 YALE L.J. 1539, 1564-76, 1589-90 (1988
95. See, e.g., JEFFREY ABRAMSON, WE, THE JURY: THE JURY SYSTEM AND THE IDEAL OF DEMOCRACY 91-92 (2000
96. see also Thomas W. Merrill, Article III, Agency Adjudication, and the Origins of the Appellate Review Model of Administrative Law, 111 COLUM. L. REV. 939, 1000 (2011
97. http://www.osha.gov/as/opa/osha35yearmilestones.html
98. http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/ 4AF8764324331288852574250069E494/File/EPACASAC-08-009-unsigned.pdf.
99. see also Letter from Lisa P. Jackson, Adm'r, U.S. Entl. Prot. Agency, to Sen. Thomas R. Carper (July 13, 2011
100. http://www.eenews.net/assets/2011/07/14/document-gw-03.pdf.
101. http://www.epa.gov/glo/actions.html#stand
102. See John M. Broder, Obama Abandons A Stricter Limit on Air Pollution, N.Y. TIMES, Sept. 3, 2011, at A1;
103. Leslie Kaufman, Stung by the President on Air Quality, Environmentalists Weigh Their Options, N.Y. TIMES, Sept. 4, 2011, at A21;
104. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ozone-national-ambient-air- quality-standards-letter.pdf.
105. EDWARD F. COX, ROBERT C. FELLMETH & JOHN E. SCHULZ, 'THE NADER REPORT' ON THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (1969
106. See, e.g., MATTHEW D. ADLER & ERIC A. POSNER, NEW FOUNDATIONS OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS 12-13 (2006
107. RICHARD L. REVESZ & MICHAEL A. LIVERMORE, RETAKING RATIONALITY: HOW COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS CAN BETTER PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT AND OUR HEALTH 9-20, 55-150 (2008
108. Winston Harrington, Lisa Heinzerling & Richard D. Morgenstern, Controversies Surrounding Regulatory Impact Analysis, in REFORMING REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS 14-17 (Winston Harrington, Lisa Heinzerling & Richard D. Morgenstern eds., 2009
109. Amy Sinden, Douglas A. Kysar & David M. Driesen, Cost-Benefit Analysis: New Foundations on Shifting Sand, 3 REGULATION & GOVERNANCE 48 (2009
110. http://democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/blog/report-mine-safety-backlog- reductionstrategy-working-despite-continued-flood-appeals.
111. See, e.g., JOHN GASTIL ET AL., THE JURY AND DEMOCRACY: HOW JURY DELIBERATION PROMOTES CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION 70-71, 129-53 (2010
112. See, e.g., Arthur Austin, The Jury System at Risk from Complexity, the New Media, and Deviancy, 73 DENV. U. L. REV. 51, 52-54 (1995
113. See NEIL VIDMAR & VALERIE P. HANS, AMERICAN JURIES: THE VERDICT 16 (2007
114. See Douglas G. Smith, Structural and Functional Aspects of the Jury: Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Reform, 48 ALA. L. REV. 441, 497-98 (1997
115. See, e.g., Cass R. Sunstein, Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes, 110 YALE L.J. 71 (2000
116. See, e.g., Dan Kahan et al., Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White-Male Effect in Risk Perception, 4 J. EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUD. 465 (2007
117. See Rebecca L. Brown, Accountability, Liberty, and the Constitution, 98 COLUM. L. REV. 531 (1998
118. See generally ETHAN J. LEIB, DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA: A PROPOSAL FOR A POPULAR BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT 12-13, 23-27 (2004).