Practice of embryo transfer: Recommendations during and after

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 291-296

  Tiras, Bulent ^a   Cenksoy, Pinar Ozcan ^b  

^a ACIBADEM UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

assisted reproductive technology; embryo transfer technique; successful embryo transfer

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CATHETER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ECHOGRAPHY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIUM; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION; MUCUS; NIDATION; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OVARIAN RESERVE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PHYSICIAN; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; UTERINE CERVIX MUCUS; UTERUS CAVITY; UTERUS CONTRACTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; INFERTILITY; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTION; RISK FACTOR; STANDARDS;

EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84902361059     PISSN: 15268004     EISSN: 15264564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1375181     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates; 2006. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/art/ART2006/ PDF/2006ART.pdf. Accessed on May 21, 2014
2. Strandell A., Bergh C., Lundin K. Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer may reduce the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 12 2520 2525 (Pubitemid 32000507)
3. Hoozemans D. A., Schats R., Lambalk C. B., Homburg R., Hompes P. G. Human embryo implantation: current knowledge and clinical implications in assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biomed Online: 2004; 9 6 692 715 (Pubitemid 40028888)
4. Schoolcraft W. B., Surrey E. S., Gardner D. K. Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril: 2001; 76 5 863 870 (Pubitemid 33034571)
5. Neithardt A. B., Segars J. H., Hennessy S., James A. N., McKeeby J. L. Embryo afterloading: a refinement in embryo transfer technique that may increase clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril: 2005; 83 3 710 714 (Pubitemid 40348585)
6. Scott L. Embryological strategies for overcoming recurrent assisted reproductive technology treatment failure. Hum Fertil (Camb): 2002; 5 4 206 214 (Pubitemid 36277749)
7. Schats R., Sutter P. D., Bassil S., Kremer J. A., Tournaye H., Donnez J. Ovarian stimulation during assisted reproduction treatment: a comparison of recombinant and highly purified urinary human FSH. On behalf of The Feronia and Apis study group. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 8 1691 1697 (Pubitemid 30636054)
8. Kovacs G. T. What factors are important for successful embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod: 1999; 14 3 590 592 (Pubitemid 29131230)
9. Salha O. H., Lamb V. K., Balen A. H. A postal survey of embryo transfer practice in the UK. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 4 686 690 (Pubitemid 32293796)
10. Mains L., Van Voorhis B. J. Optimizing the technique of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 3 785 790
11. Tomás C., Tikkinen K., Tuomivaara L., Tapanainen J. S., Martikainen H. The degree of difficulty of embryo transfer is an independent factor for predicting pregnancy. Hum Reprod: 2002; 17 10 2632 2635 (Pubitemid 35174114)
12. Rhodes T. L., McCoy T. P., Higdon H. L. III, Boone W. R. Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet: 2005; 22 9-10 335 346 (Pubitemid 41531548)
13. Sallam H. N., Agameya A. F., Rahman A. F., Ezzeldin F., Sallam A. N. Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood on the success of embryo transfer-experience from a single provider. J Assist Reprod Genet: 2003; 20 4 135 142 (Pubitemid 36438250)
14. De Placido G., Wilding M., Stina I., et al. The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program. J Assist Reprod Genet: 2002; 19 1 14 18 (Pubitemid 34194475)
15. Tiras B., Korucuoglu U., Polat M., Saltik A., Zeyneloglu H. B., Yarali H. Effect of blood and mucus on the success rates of embryo transfers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol: 2012; 165 2 239 242
16. Singh N., Gupta P., Mittal S., Malhotra N. Correlation of technical difficulty during embryo transfer with rate of clinical pregnancy. J Hum Reprod Sci: 2012; 5 3 258 261
17. Phillips J. A., Martins W. P., Nastri C. O., Raine-Fenning N. J. Difficult embryo transfers or blood on catheter and assisted reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol: 2013; 168 2 121 128
18. Kato O., Takatsuka R., Asch R. H. Transvaginal-transmyometrial embryo transfer: the Towako method; experiences of 104 cases. Fertil Steril: 1993; 59 1 51 53 (Pubitemid 23027334)
19. Mansour R., Aboulghar M., Serour G. Dummy embryo transfer: a technique that minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril: 1990; 54 4 678 681 (Pubitemid 20350659)
20. Knutzen V., Stratton C. J., Sher G., McNamee P. I., Huang T. T., Soto-Albors C. Mock embryo transfer in early luteal phase, the cycle before in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a descriptive study. Fertil Steril: 1992; 57 1 156 162
21. Katariya K. O., Bates G. W., Robinson R. D., Arthur N. J., Propst A. M. Does the timing of mock embryo transfer affect in vitro fertilization implantation and pregnancy rates? Fertil Steril: 2007; 88 5 1462 1464 (Pubitemid 350030073)
22. Prapas N., Prapas Y., Panagiotidis Y., Prapa S., Vanderzwalmen P., Makedos G. Cervical dilatation has a positive impact on the outcome of IVF in randomly assigned cases having two previous difficult embryo transfers. Hum Reprod: 2004; 19 8 1791 1795 (Pubitemid 39144624)
23. Aust T. R., Herod J. J., Gazvani R. Placement of a Malecot catheter to enable embryo transfer after radical trachelectomy. Fertil Steril: 2005; 83 6 1842
24. Pabuccu R., Ceyhan S. T., Onalan G., Goktolga U., Ercan C. M., Selam B. Successful treatment of cervical stenosis with hysteroscopic canalization before embryo transfer in patients undergoing IVF: a case series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol: 2005; 12 5 436 438 (Pubitemid 41423759)
25. Glatstein I. Z., Pang S. C., McShane P. M. Successful pregnancies with the use of laminaria tents before embryo transfer for refractory cervical stenosis. Fertil Steril: 1997; 67 6 1172 1174 (Pubitemid 27241918)
26. Henne M. B., Milki A. A. Uterine position at real embryo transfer compared with mock embryo transfer. Hum Reprod: 2004; 19 3 570 572 (Pubitemid 38344518)
27. Pope C. S., Cook E. K., Arny M., Novak A., Grow D. R. Influence of embryo transfer depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes. Fertil Steril: 2004; 81 1 51 58 (Pubitemid 38058327)
28. Coroleu B., Carreras O., Veiga A., et al. Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 3 616 620 (Pubitemid 30142372)
29. Wood E. G., Batzer F. R., Go K. J., Gutmann J. N., Corson S. L. Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 1 107 112 (Pubitemid 30035108)
30. Tang O. S., Ng E. H., So W. W., Ho P. C. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 11 2310 2315 (Pubitemid 33054128)
31. Brown J. A., Buckingham K., Abou-Setta A., Buckett W. Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2007; 24 1 CD006107
32. Lewin A., Schenker J. G., Avrech O., Shapira S., Safran A., Friedler S. The role of uterine straightening by passive bladder distension before embryo transfer in IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet: 1997; 14 1 32 34 (Pubitemid 27056970)
33. Lorusso F., Depalo R., Bettocchi S., Vacca M., Vimercati A., Selvaggi L. Outcome of in vitro fertilization after transabdominal ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer with a full or empty bladder. Fertil Steril: 2005; 84 4 1046 1048 (Pubitemid 41414608)
34. Abou-Setta A. M., Al-Inany H. G., Mansour R. T., Serour G. I., Aboulghar M. A. Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod: 2005; 20 11 3114 3121 (Pubitemid 41662664)
35. Buckett W. M. A review and meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer. Fertil Steril: 2006; 85 3 728 734 (Pubitemid 43261569)
36. Yao Z., Vansteelandt S., Van der Elst J., Coetsier T., Dhont M., De Sutter P. The efficacy of the embryo transfer catheter in IVF and ICSI is operator-dependent: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod: 2009; 24 4 880 887
37. Aboulfotouh I., Abou-Setta A. M., Khattab S., Mohsen I. A., Askalani A., el-Din R. E. Firm versus soft embryo transfer catheters under ultrasound guidance: does catheter choice really influence the pregnancy rates? Fertil Steril: 2008; 89 5 1261 1262 (Pubitemid 351671718)
38. Marconi G., Vilela M., Belló J., Diradourián M., Quintana R., Sueldo C. Endometrial lesions caused by catheters used for embryo transfers: a preliminary report. Fertil Steril: 2003; 80 2 363 367 (Pubitemid 36959795)
39. McIlveen M., Lok F. D., Pritchard J., Lashen H. Modern embryo transfer catheters and pregnancy outcome: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril: 2005; 84 4 996 1000 (Pubitemid 41414591)
40. Leeton J., Trounson A., Jessup D., Wood C. The technique for human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril: 1982; 38 2 156 161 (Pubitemid 12064185)
41. Visser D. S., Fourie F. L., Kruger H. F. Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J Assist Reprod Genet: 1993; 10 1 37 43 (Pubitemid 23136594)
42. Moragianni V. A., Cohen J. D., Smith S. E., et al. Effect of macroscopic or microscopic blood and mucus on the success rates of embryo transfers. Fertil Steril: 2010; 93 2 570 573
43. Eskandar M. A., Abou-Setta A. M., El-Amin M., Almushait M. A., Sobande A. A. Removal of cervical mucus prior to embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online: 2007; 14 3 308 313 (Pubitemid 46463628)
44. Michael E., Ahmady A. The use of a cytobrush in cervical canal preparation for embryo transfer procedures. Fertil Steril: 2005; 84 S357
45. Moore D. E., Soules M. R., Klein N. A., Fujimoto V. Y., Agnew K. J., Eschenbach D. A. Bacteria in the transfer catheter tip influence the live-birth rate after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril: 2000; 74 6 1118 1124
46. Brook N., Khalaf Y., Coomarasamy A., Edgeworth J., Braude P. A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics (co-amoxiclav) prior to embryo transfer. Hum Reprod: 2006; 21 11 2911 2915 (Pubitemid 44567006)
47. Kroon B., Hart R. J., Wong B. M., Ford E., Yazdani A. Antibiotics prior to embryo transfer in ART. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2012; 3 CD008995
48. Ghazzawi I. M., Al-Hasani S., Karaki R., Souso S. Transfer technique and catheter choice influence the incidence of transcervical embryo expulsion and the outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod: 1999; 14 3 677 682 (Pubitemid 29131244)
49. Eytan O., Zaretsky U., Jaffa A. J., Elad D. In vitro simulations of embryo transfer in a laboratory model of the uterus. J Biomech: 2007; 40 5 1073 1080 (Pubitemid 46357545)
50. Poindexter A. N. III, Thompson D. J., Gibbons W. E., Findley W. E., Dodson M. G., Young R. L. Residual embryos in failed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril: 1986; 46 2 262 267 (Pubitemid 16041816)
51. Ebner T., Yaman C., Moser M., Sommergruber M., Pölz W., Tews G. The ineffective loading process of the embryo transfer catheter alters implantation and pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril: 2001; 76 3 630 632
52. Grygoruk C., Sieczynski P., Pietrewicz P., Mrugacz M., Gagan J., Mrugacz G. Pressure changes during embryo transfer. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 2 538 541
53. Grygoruk C., Ratomski K., Kolodziejczyk M., et al. Fluid dynamics during embryo transfer. Fertil Steril: 2011; 96 2 324 327
54. Groeneveld E., de Leeuw B., Vergouw C. G., et al. Standardization of catheter load speed during embryo transfer: comparison of manual and pump-regulated embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online: 2012; 24 2 163 169
55. Martínez F., Coroleu B., Parriego M., et al. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: immediate withdrawal of the catheter versus a 30 second wait. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 5 871 874 (Pubitemid 32451820)
56. Sroga J. M., Montville C. P., Aubuchon M., Williams D. B., Thomas M. A. Effect of delayed versus immediate embryo transfer catheter removal on pregnancy outcomes during fresh cycles. Fertil Steril: 2010; 93 6 2088 2090
57. Matorras R., Mendoza R., Expósito A., Rodriguez-Escudero F. J. Influence of the time interval between embryo catheter loading and discharging on the success of IVF. Hum Reprod: 2004; 19 9 2027 2030 (Pubitemid 39236468)
58. Nabi A., Awonuga A., Birch H., Barlow S., Stewart B. Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: does this affect in-vitro fertilization treatment outcome? Hum Reprod: 1997; 12 6 1188 1190 (Pubitemid 27273542)
59. Goudas V. T., Hammitt D. G., Damario M. A., Session D. R., Singh A. P., Dumesic D. A. Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is associated with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril: 1998; 70 5 878 882 (Pubitemid 28499082)
60. Lambers M. J., Dogan E., Lens J. W., Schats R., Hompes P. G. The position of transferred air bubbles after embryo transfer is related to pregnancy rate. Fertil Steril: 2007; 88 1 68 73 (Pubitemid 47001377)
61. Friedman B. E., Lathi R. B., Henne M. B., Fisher S. L., Milki A. A. The effect of air bubble position after blastocyst transfer on pregnancy rates in IVF cycles. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 3 944 947
62. Cenksoy P. O., FÄcÄcÄoglu C., Yesiladali M., Akcin O. A., Kaspar C. The importance of the length of uterine cavity, the position of the tip of the inner catheter and the distance between the fundal endometrial surface and the air bubbles as determinants of the pregnancy rate in IVF cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol: 2014; 172 46 50
63. van Gestel I., IJland M. M., Hoogland H. J., Evers J. L. Endometrial wave-like activity in the non-pregnant uterus. Hum Reprod Update: 2003; 9 2 131 138 (Pubitemid 36582601)
64. Jinno M., Ozaki T., Iwashita M., Nakamura Y., Kudo A., Hirano H. Measurement of endometrial tissue blood flow: a novel way to assess uterine receptivity for implantation. Fertil Steril: 2001; 76 6 1168 1174 (Pubitemid 33116381)
65. Tiras B., Polat M., Korucuoglu U., Zeyneloglu H. B., Yarali H. Impact of embryo replacement depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 4 1341 1345
66. Tiras B., Korucuoglu U., Polat M., Saltik A., Zeyneloglu H. B., Yarali H. Effect of air bubble localization after transfer on embryo transfer outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol: 2012; 164 1 52 54
67. Amarin Z. O., Obeidat B. R. Bed rest versus free mobilisation following embryo transfer: a prospective randomised study. BJOG: 2004; 111 11 1273 1276 (Pubitemid 39472175)
68. Tremellen K. P., Valbuena D., Landeras J., et al. The effect of intercourse on pregnancy rates during assisted human reproduction. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 12 2653 2658 (Pubitemid 32004634)
69. Küçük M. Bed rest after embryo transfer: is it harmful? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol: 2013; 167 2 123 126