Validation of numerical simulation for subdural cortical stimulation: Using spherical phantoms and anatomically realistic head phantom

BIOINFORMATICS 2014 - 5th Int. Conf. on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms, Proceedings; Part of 7th Int. Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, BIOSTEC 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 136-141

  Jeong, Jinmo ^a   Kim, Donghyeon ^a   Jeong, Sangdo ^a   Lee, Jonghyun ^a   Chung, Euiheon ^a   Jun, Sung Chan ^a   Kim, Sohee ^a  

^a Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Brain Phantom; Cortical Stimulation; Finite Element Method; Numerical Simulation

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BRAIN; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODES; NUMERICAL METHODS; NUMERICAL MODELS; PHANTOMS;

ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS; BRAIN PHANTOMS; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION; CORTICAL STIMULATION; ELECTRIC BRAIN STIMULATION; REALISTIC HEAD MODELS; STIMULATION ELECTRODES;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 84902347427     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5220/0004796801360141     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Bezard, E. et al., 1999. Cortical Stimulation and Epileptic Seizure: A Study of the Potential Risk in Primates. Neurosurgery, 45(2).
2. Datta, A. et al., 2009. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain stimulation, 2(4), pp.201-207.
3. Jung, Y. et al., 2013. An image-guided transcranial direct current stimulation system: a pilot phantom study. Physiological measurement, 937.
4. Kim, D.-H. et al., 2010. Distortion of the electric field distribution induced in the brain during transcranial magnetic stimulation. IET Science, Measurement &Technology, 4(1), p.12.
5. Manola, L. et al., 2007. Anodal vs cathodal stimulation of motor cortex: A modeling study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(2), pp.464-474.
6. Opitz, A. et al., 2013. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. NeuroImage, 81, pp.253-64.
7. Suesserman, M. F., Spelman, F. a &Rubinstein, J.T., 1991. In vitro measurement and characterization of current density profiles produced by non-recessed, simple recessed, and radially varying recessed stimulating electrodes. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 38(5), pp.401-8.
8. Wei, X. F. &Grill, W. M., 2005. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes. Journal of neural engineering, 2(4), pp.139-47.
9. Wongsarnpigoon, A. &Grill, W. M., 2012. Computerbased model of epidural motor cortex stimulation: effects of electrode position and geometry on activation of cortical neurons. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 123(1), pp.160-72.