Valuation of EQ-5D-3L health states in Singapore: Modeling of time trade-off values for 80 empirically observed health states

PharmacoEconomics

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 495-507

  Luo, Nan ^a   Wang, Pei ^a   Thumboo, Julian ^a,b   Lim, Yee Wei ^a   Vrijhoef, Hubertus J M ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (Singapore)

^b SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EQ 5D 3L HEALTH STATE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SINGAPORE; TIME TRADE OFF METHOD; YOUNG ADULT; HEALTH STATUS; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SINGAPORE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84902341659     PISSN: 11707690     EISSN: 11792027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0142-1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ. 1986;5:1-30. (Pubitemid 16098443)
2. Dolan P. Valuing health-related quality of life: issues and controversies. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15:119-27. (Pubitemid 29093255)
3. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972;7:118-33.
4. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:1095-108. (Pubitemid 127453463)
5. Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care. 2002;40:113-28.
6. Brazier JE, Roberts J, Deverill MD. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271-92. (Pubitemid 34143147)
7. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2007;45:238-44.
8. Lee YK, Nam HS, Chuang LH, et al. South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value Health. 2009;12:1187-93.
9. Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ. 2002;11:341-53. (Pubitemid 34578418)
10. Tongsiri S, Cairns J. Estimating population-based values for EQ-5D health states in Thailand. Value Health. 2011;14:1142-5.
11. Yusof FA, Goh A, Azmi S. Estimating an EQ-5D value set for Malaysia using time trade-off and visual analogue scale methods. Value Health. 2012;15:S85-90.
12. Golicki D, Jakubczyk M, Niewada M, et al. Valuation of EQ-5D health states in Poland: first TTO-based social value set in central and Eastern Europe. Value Health. 2010;13:289-97.
13. Viney R, Norman R, King MT, et al. Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia. Value Health. 2011;14:928-36.
14. Lamers LM, McDonnell J, Stalmeier PF, et al. The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Econ. 2006;15:1121-32. (Pubitemid 44596379)
15. Zarate V, Kind P, Valenzuela P, et al. Social evaluation of EQ-5D health states: the Chilean case. Value Health. 2011;14:1135-41.
16. Wittrup-Jensen KU, Lauridsen J, Gudex C, et al. Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37:459-66.
17. Norman R, Cronin P, Viney R, et al. International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: a review and analysis. Value Health. 2009;12:1194-200.
18. Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, et al. Do English and Chinese EQ-5D versions demonstrate measurement equivalence? An exploratory study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:7.
19. Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, et al. Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in English-speaking Asian patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:87-92. (Pubitemid 36223009)
20. Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, et al. Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in Chinese-speaking Asian patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2003;32:685-90. (Pubitemid 37391148)
21. Luo N, Low S, Lau PN, et al. Is EQ-5D a valid quality of life instrument in patients with Parkinson's disease? A study in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009;38:521-8.
22. Gao, F, Ng GY, Cheung YB, et al. The Singapore English and Chinese version of the EQ-5D achieved measurement equivalence in cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:206-13.
23. Abdin E, Subramanian M, Vaingankar JA, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life among adults in Singapore: population norms for the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(10):2983-91.
24. Wang YT, Lim HY, Tai D, et al. The impact of irritable bowel syndrome on health-related quality of life: a Singapore perspective. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:104.
25. Chong SA, Abdin E, Luo N, et al. Prevalence and impact of mental and physical comorbidity in the adult Singapore population. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2012;41:105-14.
26. Zhang XH, Li SC, Fong KY, et al. The impact of health literacy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and utility assessment among patients with rheumatic diseases. Value Health. 2009;12:S106-9.
27. Gold MR, Patrick DL, Torrance GW, et al. Identifying and valuing outcomes. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 82-134.
28. Samuelsen CH, Augestad LA, Stavem K, et al. Anchoring effects in the lead-time time trade-off. In: Proceedings of the 29th EuroQol Plenary Meeting, 13-15 Sept 2012. The Doelen Convert and Congress Hall, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
29. Liu G, Wu H, Sun L, et al. Chinese valuation of EQ-5D health states with the time trade-off method. Value Health. 2012;15:A650.
30. Silvey SD. The lagrangian multiplier test. Ann Math Stat. 1959;30:389-407.
31. Hausman J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica. 1978;46:1251-71.
32. Breusch T, Pagan A. A simple test of heteroskedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica. 1979;47:1287-94.
33. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52:591-611.
34. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2005.
35. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
36. Department of Statistics Singapore. Census of population 2010 statistical release 1: demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications-and-papers/cop2010/ census10-stat-release1.html. Accessed 15 Jul 2013.
37. Devlin NJ, Tsuchiya A, Buckingham K, et al. A uniform time tradeoff method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the 'lead time' approach. Health Econ. 2011;20:348-61.
38. Luo N, Li M, Stolk EA, et al. The effects of lead time and visual aids in TTO valuation: a study of the EQ-VT framework. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(Suppl 1):S15-24. doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0504-1.
39. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, et al. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
40. Stalmeier PF, Lamers LM, Busschbach JJ, et al. On the assessment of preferences for health and duration: maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences. Med Care. 2007;45:835-41.
41. BMJ Group Blogs. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. "One can die, but cannot fall ill". A Survey on how costs may affect choice of therapy in Singapore. http://blogs.bmj.com/spcare/2012/04/17/one-can-die-but-cannot- fall-ill-a-survey-on-how-costs-may-affec t-choice-of-therapy-in-singapore/. Accessed 15 May 2013.
42. Pakir A. Bilingual education with English as an official language: sociocultural implications. In: Alatis JE, Tan AH, editors. Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1999.