The impact of surgical resident participation in breast reduction surgery-Outcome analysis from the 2005-2011 ACS-NSQIP datasets

Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 315-321

  Fischer, John P ^a   Wes, Ari M ^a   Kovach, Stephen J ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast reduction; Complications; NSQIP; Outcomes; Resident

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; EDUCATION; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPERTROPHY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST; DATASETS AS TOPIC; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84902296773     PISSN: 2000656X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2014.882345     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Advani V, Ahad S, Gonczy C, et al. Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16, 849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP. Am J Surg 2012;203: 347-51; discussion 351-42.
2. Wilkiemeyer M, Pappas TN, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. Does resident post graduate year influence the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair? Ann Surg 2005;241:879-82; discussion 882-74.
3. Tseng WH, Jin L, Canter RJ, et al. Surgical resident involvement is safe for common elective general surgery procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2011;213:19-26; discussion 26-8.
4. Scarborough JE, Bennett KM, Pappas TN. Defining the impact of resident participation on outcomes after appendectomy. Ann Surg 2012;255:577-82.
5. Raval MV, Wang X, Cohen ME, et al. The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212: 889-98.
6. Patel SP, Gauger PG, Brown DL, et al. Resident participation does not affect surgical outcomes, despite introduction of new techniques. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:540-5.
7. Papandria D, Rhee D, Ortega G, et al. Assessing trainee impact on operative time for common general surgical procedures in ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Educ 2012;69:149-55.
8. Bakaeen FG, Dhaliwal AS, Chu D, et al. Does the level of experience of residents affect outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:1127-33; discussion 1133-24.
9. Bakaeen FG, Sethi G, Wagner TH, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft patency: residents versus attending surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:482-8; discussion 488.
10. Stoica SC, Kalavrouziotis D, Martin BJ, et al. Long-term results of heart operations performed by surgeons-in-training. Circulation 2008;118:S1-6.
11. Coates KW, Kuehl TJ, Bachofen CG, Shull BL. Analysis of surgical complications and patient outcomes in a residency training program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1380-3; discussion 1383-5.
12. Nguyen CT, Hernandez AV, Gao T, et al. Office based vasec-tomy can be performed by supervised urological residents with patient pain and morbidity comparable to those of a staff surgeon procedure. J Urol 2008;180:1451-4.
13. Jordan SW, Mioton LM, Smetona J, et al. Resident involvement and plastic surgery outcomes: an analysis of 10, 356 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:763-73.
14. Shermak MA, Chang D, Buretta K, et al. Increasing age impairs outcomes in breast reduction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128:1182-7.
15. Zubowski R, Zins JE, Foray-Kaplon A, et al. Relationship of obesity and specimen weight to complications in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:998-1003.
16. O'Grady KF, Thoma A, Dal Cin A. A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mam-maplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:736-42.
17. Chun YS, Schwartz MA, Gu X, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of postoperative complications in reduction mamma-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:228e-33e.
18. Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Camlibel M, et al. Early complications of a reduction mammoplasty technique in the treatment of macromastia with or without breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2011;11:395-9.
19. Dabbah A, Lehman JA Jr, Parker MG, et al. Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35:337-41.
20. Chan LK, Withey S, Butler PE. Smoking and wound healing problems in reduction mammaplasty: is the introduction of urine nicotine testing justified? Ann Plast Surg 2006;56:111-15.
21. Cunningham BL, Gear AJ, Kerrigan CL, Collins ED. Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:1597-604.
22. Spravchikov N, Sizyakov G, Gartsbein M, et al. Glucose effects on skin keratinocytes: implications for diabetes skin complications. Diabetes 2001;50:1627-35.
23. Fahey TJ 3rd, Sadaty A, Jones WG 2nd, et al. Diabetes impairs the late inflammatory response to wound healing. J Surg Res 1991;50:308-13.
24. Baser O. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value Health 2006;9:377-85.
25. D'Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998;17:2265-81.
26. Gu S, Rosenbaum PR. Comparison of multivariate matching methods: structure, distances, and algorithms. J Comput Graph Stat 1993;2:405-20.
27. Gala R, Orejuela F, Gerten K, et al. Effect of validated skills simulation on operating room performance in obstetrics and gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:578-4.
28. Robinson WP 3rd, Schanzer A, Cutler BS, et al. A randomized comparison of a 3-week and 6-week vascular surgery simulation course on junior surgical residents' performance of an end-to-side anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 2012;56:1771-80; discussion 1780-71.
29. Varban OA, Ardestani A, Peyre S, Smink DS. Assessing the effectiveness of surgical skills laboratories: a national survey. Simul Healthc 2013;8:91-7.
30. Pugh CM, DaRosa DA, Santacaterina S, Clark RE. Faculty evaluation of simulation-based modules for assessment of intraoperative decision making. Surgery 2011;149:534-42.
31. Hernandez-Irizarry R, Zendejas B, Ali SM, et al. Impact of resident participation on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs: are residents slowing us down? J Surg Educ 2012;69:746-52.
32. Jan A, Riggs DR, Orlando KL, Khan FJ. Surgical outcomes based on resident involvement: what is the impact on vascular surgery patients? J Surg Educ 2012;69:638-42.
33. Emre AU, Cakmak GK, Tascilar O, et al. Complications of total thyroidectomy performed by surgical residents versus specialist surgeons. Surg Today 2008;38:879-85.
34. Scarborough JE, Pappas TN, Cox MW, et al. Surgical trainee participation during infrainguinal bypass grafting procedures is associated with increased early postoperative graft failure. J Vasc Surg 2012;55:715-20.
35. Kiran RP, Ahmed Ali U, Coffey JC, et al. Impact of resident participation in surgical operations on postoperative outcomes: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 2012;256:469-75.
36. Sandblom G, Sevonius D, Staël von Holstein C. Impact of operative time and surgeon satisfaction on the long-term outcome of hernia repair. Hernia 2009;13:581-3.