GREEBLES Greeble greeb On Reduction in Speech and Gesture in Repeated References

Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 3250-3255

  Hoetjes, Marieke ^a   Koolen, Ruud ^a   Goudbeek, Martijn ^a   Krahmer, Emiel ^a   Swerts, Marc ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

gesture; reduction; repeated references; speech

Indexed keywords

% REDUCTIONS; ABSTRACT OBJECT; GESTURE; REPEATED REFERENCE;

EID: 84902285265     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1), 31-56.
2. Bard, E. G., Anderson, A. H., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 1-22.
3. Brennan, S., & Clark, H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22(6), 1482-1493.
4. Clark, H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
5. de Ruiter, J. P. (2000). The production of gesture and speech. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. de Ruiter, J. P., Bangerter, A., & Dings, P. (in press). The interplay between gesture and speech in the production of referring expressions: Investigating the trade-off hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science.
7. Frank, A. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Speaking rationally: Uniform information density as an optimal strategy for language production. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Society (CogSci), Washington.
8. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. (1997). Becoming a “Greeble” expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
9. Gerwing, J., & Bavelas, J. (2004). Linguistic influences on gesture's form. Gesture, 4, 157-195.
10. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts. New York: Academic Press.
11. Holler, J., & Stevens, R. (2007). The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language and Psychology, 26(1), 4-27.
12. Holler, J., & Wilkin, K. (2009). Communicating common ground: how mutually shared knowledge influences speech and gesture in a narrative task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 267-289.
13. Jacobs, N., & Garnham, A. (2007). The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 291-303.
14. Jaeger, T. F. (2010). Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology, 61(1), 23-62.
15. Kendon, A. (1980). Gesture and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), Nonverbal communication and language. The Hague: Mouton.
16. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lam, T. Q., & Watson, D. G. (in press). Repetition is easy: Why repeated referents have reduced prominence. Memory and Cognition.
18. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.