Participation in biobanks for research by incapacitated adults: Review and discussion of current guidelines

International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 670-681

  Togni, Elena ^a   Dierickx, Kris ^b   Porteri, Corinna ^a  

^a IRCCS ISTITUTO CENTRO SAN GIOVANNI DI DIO FATEBENEFRATELLI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

biobanks; bioethics; guidelines; incapacitated adults; neuropsychiatric patients

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL FACTOR;

BIOMEDICINE; DECISION MAKING; DEMENTIA; GENETICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL DISEASE; NEUROPSYCHIATRY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; REVIEW; ETHICS; MENTAL CAPACITY; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH ETHICS;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DEMENTIA; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GENETIC RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MENTAL DISORDERS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84902273905     PISSN: 08856230     EISSN: 10991166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gps.4059     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Alzheimer's Association. 2004. Research consent for cognitively impaired adults. Recommendations for Institutional Review Boards and Investigators. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 18: 171-175.
2. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T,. 2001. MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research. Sarasota, FL.
3. Brock D, Buchanan A,. 1989. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision-Making. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
4. California Health and Safety Code Section 24178r. 2003. California (USA).
5. Cambon-Thomsen A, Rial-Sebbag E, Knoppers BM,. 2007. Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. Eur Respir J 30: 373-382.
6. Defanti CA, Tiezzi A, Gasparini M, et al,. 2007. Ethical questions in the treatment of subjects with dementia. Part I. Respecting autonomy: awareness, competence and behavioural disorders. Neurol Sci 28: 216-231.
7. Ditto PH, Danks JH, Smucker WD, et al,. 2001. Advance directives as acts of communication. Arch Intern Med 161: 421-430.
8. Dunn LB, Nowrangi MA, Palmer BW, et al,. 2006. Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments. Am J Psychiatry 163: 1323-1334.
9. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL,. 1992. Proxy decision making for incompetent patients. JAMA 267: 2067-2071.
10. Gottweis H, Lauss G,. 2010. Biobank governance in post-genomic age. Per Med 2: 187-195.
11. Hansson MG,. 2009. Ethics and biobanks. Br J Cancer 100: 8-12.
12. Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, et al,. 2009. Biological sample collections from minors for genetic research: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet 17: 979-990.
13. Hofmann B,. 2009. Broadening consent-and diluting ethics? J Med Ethics 35: 125-129.
14. Kim SY, Karlawish JH, Caine ED,. 2002. Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 10: 151-165.
15. Knoppers BM, Avard D, Cardinal G, et al,. 2002. Science and society: children and incompetent adults in genetic research: consent and safeguards. Nat Rev Genet 3: 221-225.
16. Law on the rights of patients. August 22, 2002.
17. Mental Capacity Act. 2005.
18. Nicholson TRJ, Cutter W, Hotopf M,. 2008. Assessing mental capacity: the Mental Capacity Act. BMJ 336: 322-325.
19. Nuffield Council of Bioethics. 2009. Dementia: ethical issues. London.
20. Olde Rikkert MG, van der Vorm A, Burns A, et al,. 2008. Consensus statement on genetic research in dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 23: 262-266.
21. Pascalev A, Vidalis T,. 2010. 'Vague Oviedo': autonomy, culture and the case of previously competent patients. Bioethics 24: 145-152.
22. Porteri C, Andreatta C, Anglani L, et al,. 2009. Understanding information on clinical trials by persons with Alzheimer's dementia. A pilot study. Aging Clin Exp Res 21: 158-166.
23. Tan J, Hope T, Stewart A,. 2003. Competence to refuse treatment in anorexia nervosa. Int J Law Psychiatry 26: 697-707.
24. van der Vorm A, Rikkert MO, Vernooij-Dassen M, et al,. 2008. Genetic research into Alzheimer's disease: a European focus group study on ethical issues. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23: 11-15.
25. Wolf LE, Bouley TA, McCulloch CE,. 2010. Genetic research with stored biological materials: ethics and practice. IRB 32: 7-18.
26. WonPat-Borja AJ, Yang LH, Link BG, et al,. 2012. Eugenics, genetics, and mental illness stigma in Chinese Americans. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47: 145-156.
27. Zika E, Schulte In den Bäumen T, Kaye J, et al,. 2008. Sample, data use and protection in biobanking in Europe: legal issues. Pharmacogenomics 9: 773-781.