Auditory-based Automatic Speech Recognition

ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Statistical and Perceptual Audio Processing, SAPA 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Hemmert, Werner ^a   Holmberg, Marcus ^a   Gelbart, David ^b  

^a INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG   (Germany)

^b INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CELL MODEL; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; DYNAMIC COMPRESSION; LIMITED DYNAMIC RANGES; MODELING FEATURES; PERIPHERAL AUDITORY PROCESSING; PROCESSING STEPS; RECOGNITION ACCURACY; SENSORY CELLS;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

EID: 84902260255     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Chen, C., “Noise robustness in automatic speech recognition”, PhD thesis, University of Washington, 2004, http://ssli.ee.washington.edu/papers/publications.html
2. Greenwood, D.D., “A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later”, JASA, vol. 87, pp. 2592-2605, 1990.
3. Hermansky, H. and Morgan, N., “RASTA processing of speech”, IEEE TSAP, vol. 2, pp. 578-589, 1994.
4. Hirsch H. and Pearce, D., “The AURORA experimental framework for the performance evaluations of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions”, ISCA ITRW ASR, pp. 181-188, 2000.
5. Hunke, M., Hyun, M., Love, S. and Holton, T., “Improving the noise and spectral robustness of an isolated-word recognizer using an auditory-model front end”, ICSLP 1998, Sydney, Australia.
6. Jankowski, C., Vo, H. and Lippmann, R., “A comparison of signal processing front ends for automatic word recognition”, IEEE TSAP, vol. 3, no. 4, 1995.
7. Moser, T. and Beutner, D., “Kinetics of exocytosis and endocytosis at the cochlear inner hair cell afferent synapse of the mouse”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 97, pp. 883-888, 2000.
8. Mountain, D. C. and Cody, A. R., “Multiple modes of inner hair cell stimulation”, Hearing Research, vol. 132, pp. 1-14, 1999.
9. Robert, A. and Eriksson, J. L., “A composite model of the auditory periphery for simulating responses to complex sounds”, JASA, vol. 106, pp. 1852-1864, 1999.
10. Robles, L. and Ruggero, M. A., “Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea”, Physiological Reviews, vol. 81, pp. 1305-1352, 2001.
11. Sandhu, S., Ghitza, O. and Lee, C.-H., “A comparative study of mel cepstra and EIH for phone classification under adverse conditions”, ICASSP 1995, Detroit, USA.
12. Sheikhzadeh, H. and Deng, L., “Speech analysis and recognition using interval statistics generated from a composite auditory model”, IEEE TSAP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 90-94, 1998.
13. Strube, H. W., “A computionally efficient basilar-membrane model”, Acustica, vol. 58, pp. 207-214, 1985.
14. van Vuuren, S. and Hermansky, H., “Data-driven design of RASTA-like filters”, Eurospeech 1997, Rhodes, Greece.
15. Wang, K. and Shamma, S., “Self-normalization and noise robustness in early auditory representations”, IEEE TSAP, vol. 3, pp. 382-395, 1994.
16. Westerman, L.A. and Smith, R.L. “Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses”, Hearing Research,vol. 15, pp. 249-260, 1984.