The views of health care professionals about selective decontamination of the digestive tract: An international, theoretically informed interview study

Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 634-640

  Duncan, Eilidh M ^a   Cuthbertson, Brian H ^b   Prior, Maria E ^a   Marshall, Andrea P ^c   Wells, Elisabeth C ^d   Todd, Laura E ^e   Bolsover, Denise ^a   Newlands, Rumana S ^a   Webster, Fiona ^e   Rose, Louise ^b   Campbell, Marion K ^a   Bellingan, Geoff ^f   Seppelt, Ian M ^g   Francis, Jill J ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^h CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Antibiotic prophylaxis; Intensive care unit; Qualitative research; Theoretical domains framework

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; ASEPSIS; AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTENSIVIST; MALE; MICROBIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE MANAGER; PHARMACIST ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION OF THE DIGESTIVE TRACT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSS INFECTION; DECISION MAKING; DELPHI STUDY; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; LINGUISTICS; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEW ZEALAND; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CROSS INFECTION; DECISION MAKING; DECONTAMINATION; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DRUG RESISTANCE, MICROBIAL; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NEW ZEALAND; PRIMARY PREVENTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84902259671     PISSN: 08839441     EISSN: 15578615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.013     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Silvestri L., van Saene H.K., Milanese M., et al. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces bacterial bloodstream infection and mortality in critically ill patients. Systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. J Hosp Infect 2007, 65:187-203.
2. Silvestri L., van Saene H.K., Milanese M., et al. Impact of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on fungal carriage and infection: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31:898-910.
3. Liberati A., D'Amico R., Pifferi S., et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, (4):CD000022. [Art. No.]. 10.1002/14651858.CD000022.pub3.
4. de Jonge E., Schultz M.J., Spanjaard L., et al. Effects of selective decontamination of digestive tract on mortality and acquisition of resistant bacteria in intensive care: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003, 362:1011-1016.
5. Oostdijk E.A.N., De Smet A.M.G.A., Bonten M.J.M., et al. Effects of decontamination of the digestive tract and oropharynx in intensive care unit patients on 1-year survival. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013, 188:117-120.
6. de Smet A.M., Kluytmans J.A., Blok H.E., et al. Selective digestive tract decontamination and selective oropharyngeal decontamination and antibiotic resistance in patients in intensive-care units: an open-label, clustered group-randomised, crossover study. Lancet Infect Dis 2011, 11:372-380.
7. Daneman N., Sarwar S., Fowler R.A., et al. Effect of selective decontamination on antimicrobial resistance in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2013, 13:328-341.
8. Houben A.J.M., Oostdijk E.A.N., van der Voort P.H.H., et al. Selective decontamination of the oropharynx and the digestive tract and antimicrobial resistance: a 4 year ecological study in 38 intensive care units in the Netherlands. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014, 69:797-804.
9. Oostdijk E.A.N., De Smet A.M.G.A., Blok H.E.M., et al. Ecological effects of selective decontamination on resistant Gram-negative bacterial colonization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010, 181:452-457.
10. Vincent J., Jacobs F. Effect of selective decontamination on antibiotic resistance. Lancet 2011, 11:337-338.
11. Bastin A.J., Ryanna K.B. Use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in United Kingdom intensive care units. Anaesthesia 2009, 64:46-49.
12. Cuthbertson B.H., Francis J., Campbell M.K., et al. A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study). Trials 2010, 11:117.
13. Jongerden I.P., de Smet A.M., Kluytmans J.A., et al. Physicians' and nurses' opinions on selective decontamination of the digestive tract and selective oropharyngeal decontamination: a survey. Crit Care 2010, 14:R132.
14. Michie S., Johnston M., Abraham C., et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2005, 14:26-33.
15. Stoutenbeek C.P., van Saene H.K., Little R.A., et al. The effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on mortality in multiple trauma patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:261-270.
16. de Smet A.M., Kluytmans J.A., Cooper B.S., et al. Decontamination of the digestive tract and oropharynx in ICU patients. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:20-31.
17. Dalkey N.C., Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 1963, 9:458-467.
18. Dalkey N.C. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion 1969.
19. Park R.E., Fink A., Brook R.H., et al. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice. Am J Public Health 1989, 79:445-447.
20. Francis J.J., Duncan E.M., Prior M.E., et al: Selective Decontamination of the Digestive tract in critically ill patients treated in Intensive Care Units: a mixed-methods feasibility study (the SuDDICU study). Health Technol Assess., in press.
21. Akins R.B., Tolson H., Cole B.R. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005, 5.
22. Hsieh H.F., Shannon S.E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005, 15:1277-1288.
23. Francis J.J., Stockton C., Eccles M.P., et al. Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians' blood transfusion behaviour. Br J Health Psychol 2009, 14:625-646.
24. Ritchie J. The applications of qualitative methods to social research. Qualitative research practice 2003, 24-46. Sage Publications Ltd., London. J. Ritchie, J. Lewis (Eds.).
25. Marshall A.P., Weisbrodt L., Rose L., et al. Implementing selective digestive tract decontamination in the intensive care unit: a qualitative analysis of nurse-identified considerations. Heart Lung 2014, 43:13-18.
26. Dyson J., Lawton R., Jackson C., et al. Does the use of a theoretical approach tell us more about hand hygiene behaviour? The barriers and levers to hand hygiene. J Infect Prev 2011, 12:17-24.
27. Michie S., Johnston M., Francis J.J., et al. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol 2008, 57:660-680.