The sex and ethnicity or national origins of researchers in astronomy and oncology in four countries, 2006-2007 and 2011-2012

Scientometrics

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 287-296

  Roe, Philip ^a   Lewison, Grant ^b   Webber, Richard ^c  

^a Evaluametrics Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Ethnic minorities; Onomastics; Women

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902239136     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1223-1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abramo, G., d'Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79, 517-539.
2. Adman, P. (2011). Investigating political equality: The example of gender and political participation in Sweden. Acta Politica, 46(4), 380-399.
3. Basu, A., & Lewison, G. (2005). Going beyond journal classification for evaluation of research outputs: A case study of global astronomy and astrophysics research. ASLIB Proceedings, 57(3), 232-246.
4. Basu, A., Roe, P., & Lewison, G. (2012). The Indian diaspora in cancer research: a bibliometric assessment for Canada and the USA. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 110-120). Montréal: Science-Metrix.
5. Batista, PD., & Leta, J. (2009). Brazilian authors' scientific performance: Does gender matter? In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp 343-353). Rio de Janeiro.
6. Beji-Becheur, A., Ozcaglar-Toulouse, N., & Zoaghi, S. (2012). Ethnicity introspected: Researchers in search of their identity. Journal of Business Research, 65(4), 504-510.
7. Blanke, J., & Chiesa, T. (eds). (2013). The Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Available at: http://www3. weforum. org/docs/WEF_TT_Competitiveness_Report_2013. pdf. ISBN-13: 978-92-95044-40-1.
8. Boswell, C. (2012). How information scarcity influences the policy agenda: Evidence from UK immigration policy. Governance - An International Journal of Policy Administration and Instituions, 25(3), 367-389.
9. Brush, S. G. (1991). Women in science and engineering. American Scientist, 79(5), 404-419. Available at: http://www. jstor. org/stable/29774475.
10. Carnes, M., Schular, L., Sarto, G. E., Lent, S. J., & Bakken, L. (2006). Increasing sex and ethnic/racial diversity of researchers in aging: Some promising strategies at the post-doctoral level. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54(6), 980-985.
11. Cohen, J. J. (1998). Time to shatter the glass ceiling for minority faculty. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(9), 821-822.
12. Dahlstrom, C., & Esaiasson, P. (2013). The immigration issue and anti-immigrant party success in Sweden 1970-2006: A deviant case analysis. Party Politics, 19(2), 343-364.
13. de Cheveigne, S. (2009). The career paths of women (and men) in French research. Social Studies of Science, 39(1), 113-136.
14. Einaudi, P. (2011). Two decades of increasing diversity more than doubled the number of minority graduate students in science and engineering. Washington DC: NSF. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, paper NSF 11-319.
15. Ellemers, N., van den Heuvel, H., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The under-representation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 315-338.
16. Govoni, P. (2013). The power of weak competitors: Women scholars, "popular science", and the building of a scientific community in Italy, 1860s-1930s. Science in Context, 26(3), 405-436.
17. Green-Pedersen, C., & Krogstrup, J. (2008). Immigration as a political issue in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Political Research, 47(5), 610-634.
18. Gryn, T., & Gambino, C. (2012). The foreign born from Asia: 2011 Washington DC: US Department of Commerce, United States Census Bureau. Available at: http://www. census. gov/prod/2012pubs/acsbr11-06. pdf.
19. Gupta, N., Kemelgor, C., Fuchs, S., & Etzkowitz, H. (2005). Triple burden on women in science: A cross-cultural analysis. Current Science, 89(8), 1382-1386.
20. Hanks, P. (Ed.). (2003). Dictionary of American family names, (pp. xxv-xxvi). Oxford: OUP.
21. Ivie, R., & Tesfaye, C. L. (2012). Women in physics: A tale of limits. Physics Today, 65(2), 47-50. Available at: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1063/PT. 3. 1439.
22. Ivie, R., White, S., Garrett, A., & Anderson, G. (2013). Women among physics and astronomy faculty: Results from the 2010 survey of physics degree-granting departments. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics, Statistical Research Center.
23. Kurup, A., & Maithreyi, R. (2011). Beyond family and societal attitudes to retain women in science. Current Science, 100(1), 43-48.
24. Lewison, G. (2001). The quantity and quality of female researchers: a bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52(1), 29-43.
25. Lewison, G. (2011). Definition of cancer research: Journals, titles, abstracts or keywords? DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 31, 333-339.
26. Lewison, G., & Jacobs, D. (2011). Science in South Africa: have Black Africans, Coloureds and Indians prospered since the ending of apartheid? In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 418-429). Durban.
27. Lewison, G., & Leta, J. (2003). The contribution of women in Brazilian science: a case study in astronomy, immunology and oceanography. Scientometrics, 57, 339-353.
28. Lewison, G., & Markusova, V. (2011). Female researchers in Russia: Have they become more visible? Scientometrics, 89, 139-152.
29. Longley, P. A., Webber, R., & Lloyd, D. (2007). The quantitative analysis of family names: Historic migration and the present day neighbourhood structure of Middlesbrough, United Kingdom. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(1), 31-48.
30. Mauleon, E., Bordons, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2008). The effect of gender on research staff success in life sciences in the Spanish national research council. Research Evaluation, 17, 213-225.
31. Mulvey, G. (2010). When policy creates politics: The problematizing of immigration and the consequences for refugee integration in the UK. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(4), 437-462.
32. NSF. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013. Washington DC: National Science Foundation, Aug 2013. Available at: http://www. nsf. gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/nsf13304_full. pdf.
33. Orrenius, P. M., & Zavodny, M. (2012). The economics of US immigration policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(4), 948-956.
34. Palepu, A., Carr, P. L., Friedman, R. H., Amos, H., Ash, A. S., & Moskowitz, M. A. (1998). Minority faculty and academic rank in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(9), 767-771.
35. Webber, R. (2010). Researching behavioural differences among ethnic minority groups: The case for inferring ethnicity on the basis of people's names. International Journal of Market Research, 52(2), 191-215.
36. Webster, B. M. (2001). Polish women in science: A bibliometric analysis of Polish science and its publications, 1980-1999. Research Evaluation, 10, 185-194.
37. Webster, B. M. (2004). Bibliometric analysis of presence and impact of ethnic minority researchers on science in the UK. Research Evaluation, 13(1), 69-76.
38. Widnall, S. E. (1988). AAAS presidential lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science, 241, 1740-1745.
39. Zincone, G. (2006). The making of policies: Immigration and immigrants in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(3), 347-375.