The contribution of women in Brazilian science: A case study in astronomy, immunology and oceanography

Scientometrics

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 339-353

  Leta, Jacqueline ^a   Lewison, Grant ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243164369     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025000600840     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ROSSI A. S., Women in science: why so few? Science, 148 (1965) 1196-1202.
2. MOORE K. M., Women's access and opportunity in higher education: toward the twenty-first century. Comparative Education, 23 (1987) 23-33.
3. MC GREGOR E., HARDING S., Science by whom? In World Science Report, Paris, UNESCO 1996. At http://www.unesco.org/science/publications/wsrw2
4. TOBIAS S., URRY M., VENKATESAN A., Physics: for women, the last frontier. Science, 296 (2002) 1201.
5. KONDRO W., Canada - few women win new academic chairs. Science, 296 (2002) 2319.
6. OSBORN M., Status and prospects of women in science in Europe. Science, (11 March) 263 (1994) 1389-1391.
7. BARINAGA M., Women in science 94 - surprises across the cultural divide. Science, (11 March) 263 (1994) 1468-1496.
8. HASSAN F., Islamic women in science. Science, (6 October) 290 (2000) 55-56.
9. VETTER B. M., Women scientists and engineers: trends in participation. Science, 214 (1981) 1313-1321.
10. LANE J. N., Why are there so few women in science. Science debate. at http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/women/women_frameset.html
11. KYVIK S., TEIGEN M., Child care, research collaboration and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21 (1996) 54-71.
12. DUTT D., How much gender disparity exists in salary? A profile of graduates of a major public university. Research in Higher Education, 38 (1997) 631-646.
13. SEACGRIST L., Disparities detailed in NCI division. Science, 264 (1994) 340.
14. ETZKOWITZ H., KEMELGOR C., NEUSCHATZ M., UZZI B., ALONZO J., The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science, 266 (1994) 51-54.
15. LEWISON G., The quantity and quality of female researchers: a bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52(1) (2001) 29-43.
16. WEBSTER, B. M., Polish women in science: a bibliometric analysis of Polish science and its publications, 1980-1999. Research Evaluation, 10(3) (2001) 185-194.
17. VELHO L., LEÓN E., A construção social da produção científica por mulheres. Cadernos Pagu, 10 (1988) 309-344.
18. CNPq, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. Diretório de Grupos de Pesquisa, Available at: http://lattes.cnpq.br:8888/plataformalattes/index.jsp?menu=diretorio/menu0. htm&url=diretorio/apresentacao.htm
19. LEWISON G., The definition of biomedical research sub-fields with title keywords and application to the analysis of research outputs. Research Evaluation, 6(1) (1996) 25-36.
20. LEWISON G., The definition and calibration of biomedical sub-fields. Scientometrics, 46(3) (1999) 529-537.
21. BASU A., LEWISON G., Evaluation of astronomy and astrophysics research output using a title-word search in place of journal classification. In: Eighth International Conference of International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics, Sydney, Australia, 2001.
22. LEWISON G., LIPWORTH S., RIPPON I., Austrian biomedical research outputs 1991-2000. Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Vienna, 2002.
23. GOMEZ I., SANCHO R., MORENO L., FERNANDEZ M. T., Influence of Latin-American journals coverage by international databases. Scientometrics, 46(3) (1999) 443-456.
24. FUVEST, Fundação universitária para o Vestibular. Available at http://www.fuvest.br/
25. BASU A., VINU KUMAR B. S., International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics, 48(3) (2000) 381-402.
26. FERNANDEZ M. T., GOMEZ I., SEBASTIAN J., Scientific cooperation of Latin-American countries through bibliometrics indicators. Interciencia, 23(6) (1998) 328+.
27. BRAUN T., GLÄNZEL W., International collaboration - will it be keeping alive East European research? Scientometrics, 36(2) (1996) 247-254.
28. LEWISON G., FAWCETT-JONES A., KESSLER C., Latin American scientific output 1986-91 and international co-authorship patterns. Sciento metrics, 27(3) (1993) 317-336.
29. NARIN F., STEVENS K., WHITLOW E. S., Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 313-324.
30. VAN RAAN A. F. J., The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Scientometrics, 42(3) (1998) 423-428.
31. RAMSAY S., Radical reform of UK consultants salaries announced. The Lancet, (15 August) 352 (1998) 555.
32. WENNERAS C., WOLD A., Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature, 387 (1997) 341-343.
33. BRUSCHINI C., Crescimento e crise: trabalho das brasileiras, paulistas e nordestinas, de 1970 a 1985. Ciência e Cultura, 42 (1990) 226-247.
34. IBGE, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Available at http://www.ibge.gov.br
35. CNPq, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. Diretório de Grupos de Pesquisa, ano 2002. Séries Históricas. Available at http://www.cnpq.br http://lattes.cnpq.br:8888/plataformalattes/index.jsp?menu=diretorio/menu0. htm&url=diretorio/ apresentacao.htm