Automated detection of structural alerts (chemical fragments) in (eco)toxicology

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2013, Pages e201302013-

  Lepailleur, Alban ^a,b   Poezevara, Guillaume ^a,c   Bureau, Ronan ^a,b  

^a NORMANDIE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b CENTRE D ETUDES ET DE RECHERCHE SUR LE MÉDICAMENT DE NORMANDIE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902202010     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20010370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5936/csbj.201302013     Document Type: Short Survey

References (43)

1. REACH. Registration Evaluation Authorization and restriction of Chemicals 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/reach-intro.htm.
2. Rogers, M. D., The European Commission's White Paper "Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy": A Review. Risk Anal. 2003, 23 (2), 381-388. (Pubitemid 36459271)
3. Pearl, G. M.; Livingston-Carr, S.; Durham, S. K., Integration of computational analysis as a sentinel tool in toxicological assessments. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2001, 1 (4), 247-255.
4. Ashby, J.; Tennant, R. W., Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP. Mutat. Res. 1991, 257(3), 229-306. (Pubitemid 121007619)
5. Benigni, R.; Bossa, C, Mechanisms of Chemical Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity: A Review with Implications for Predictive Toxicology. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111 (4), 2507-2536.
6. Benigni, R.; Bossa, C, Structure alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system: A novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology. Mutat. Res. Rev. 2008, 659 (3), 248-261.
7. van Leeuwen, K.; Schultz, T. W.; Henry, T.; Diderich, B.; Veith, G. D., Using chemical categories to fill data gaps in hazard assessment. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2009, 20 (3-4), 207-220.
8. Sanderson, D. M.; Earnshaw, C. G., Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure; the DEREK system. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 1991, 10 (4), 261-273.
9. Ridings, J. E.; Barratt, M. D.; Cary, R.; Earnshaw, C. G.; Eggington, C. E.; Ellis, M. K.; Judson, P. N.; Langowski, J. J.; Marchant, C. A.; Payne, M. P.; Watson, W. P.; Yih, T. D., Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure: an update on the DEREK system. Toxicology 1996, 106(1-3), 267-279. (Pubitemid 26038295)
10. Scheiber, J.; Jenkins, J. L.; Sukuru, S. C; Bender, A.; Mikhailov, D.; Milik, M.; Azzaoui, K.; Whitebread, S.; Hamon, J.; Urban, L.; Glick, M.; Davies, J. W. Mapping adverse drug reactions in chemical space. /. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 3103-3107.
11. Pauwels, E.; Stoven, V.; Yamanishi, Y. Predicting drug side-effect profiles: a chemical fragment-based approach. BMC Bioinformatics 2011,12, 169.
12. Klopman, G., Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules. /. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 706' (24), 7315-7321. (Pubitemid 15216948)
13. Klopman, G., MULTICASE 1. A Hierarchical Computer Automated Structure Evaluation Program. Quant. Struct.-Act. Rel. 1992, 11 (2), 176-184.
14. Klopman, G.; Chakravarti, S. K.; Zhu, H.; Ivanov, J. M.; Saiakhov, R. D., ESP: a method to predict toxicity and pharmacological properties of chemicals using multiple MCASE databases. /. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (2), 704-15.
15. Poroikov, V. V.; Filimonov, D. A.; Borodina, Y. V.; Lagunin, A. A.; Kos, A., Robustness of biological activity spectra predicting by computer program PASS for noncongeneric sets of chemical compounds. /. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40 (6), 1349-55.
16. Lagunin, A.; Stepanchikova, A.; Filimonov, D.; Poroikov, V., PASS: prediction of activity spectra for biologically active substances. Bioinformatics 2000, 16(8), 747-8.
17. Filimonov, D.; Poroikov, V.; Borodina, Y.; Gloriozova, T., Chemical Similarity Assessment through Multilevel Neighborhoods of Atoms: Definition and Comparison with the Other Descriptors. /. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39 (4), 666-670. (Pubitemid 129539566)
18. Cunningham, A. R.; Moss, S. T.; Iype, S. A.; Qian, G.; Qamar, S.; Cunningham, S. L., Structure-activity relationship analysis of rat mammary carcinogens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008,22 (10), 1970-82.
19. Helma, C; Cramer, T.; Kramer, S.; De Raedt, L., Data Mining and Machine Learning Techniques for the Identification of Mutagenicity Inducing Substructures and Structure Activity Relationships of Noncongeneric Compounds. /. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (4), 1402-1411.
20. Agrawal, R.; Srikant, R. Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.: San Francisco, USA, 1994, pp. 487-499
21. Corneil, D. G.; Krueger, R. M. A Unified View of Graph Searching. SIAMJ. Discret. Math. 2008, 22, 1259-1276.
22. Inokuchi, A.; Washio, T.; Motoda, H. An Apriori-Based Algorithm for Mining Frequent Substructures from Graph Data. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Springer-Verlag: London, UK, 2000; pp 13 - 23.
23. Nijssen, S.; Kok, J. N. A quickstart in frequent structure mining can make a difference. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM: New York, USA, 2004; pp 647-652. (Pubitemid 40114985)
24. Yan, X.; Han, J. gSpan : Graph-Based Substructure Pattern Mining. In ICDM, 2003; pp 721-724.
25. Han, J.; Cheng, H.; Xin, D.; Yan, X., Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 2007, 15, 55-86. (Pubitemid 47142811)
26. Kazius, J.; Nijssen, S.; Kok, J.; Back, T.; Ijzerman, A. P., Substructure mining using elaborate chemical representation. /. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46(2), 597-605.
27. Borgelt, C; Berthold, M. R., Mining molecular fragments: finding relevant substructures of molecules. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining 2002, 51-58.
28. Zaki, M.J.; arthasarathy, S.; Ogihara, M.; Li, W. New Algorithms for Fast Discovery of Association Rules. Technical Rapport, Rochester USA, 1997.29.
29. Karunaratne, T. Is Frequent Pattern Mining useful in building predictive models? ECMLI PKDD workshop of Collective Learning and Inference on Structured Data 2011.
30. Dong, G.; Li, J., Efficient Mining of Emerging Patterns: Discovering Trends and Differences. In KDD, 1999; pp 43-52.
31. Mannila, H.; Toivonen, H. Multiple uses of frequent sets and condensed representations. In Proc. of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Databases 1996, 89-194.
32. Bayardo, J., Efficiently Mining Long Patterns from Databases. In SIGMOD Conference, 1998; pp 85-93. (Pubitemid 128655959)
33. Li, J.; Dong, G.; Ramamohanarao, K. Making use of the most expressive jumping emerging patterns for classification. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2001, 3, 1-29.
34. Auer, J.; Bajorath, J., Emerging chemical patterns: a new methodology for molecular classification and compound selection. /. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46(6), 2502-14. (Pubitemid 46008122)
35. Lozano, S.; Poezevara, G.; Halm-Lemeille, M. P.; Lescot-Fontaine, E.; Lepailleur, A.; Bissell-Siders, R.; Cremilleux, B.; Rault, S.; Cuissart, B.; Bureau, R., Introduction of jumping fragments in combination with QSARs for the assessment of classification in ecotoxicology. /. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50 (8), 1330-1339.
36. Poezevara, G.; Cuissart, B.; Cremilleux, B., Discovering Emerging Graph Patterns from Chemicals. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Berlin; Heidelberg, Eds. 2009; Vol. 5722, pp 45-55.
37. Worlein, M.; Meinl, T.; Fischer, I.; Philippsen, M., A quantitative comparison of the subgraph miners mofa, gspan, FFSM, and gaston. In Proc. of the 9th European conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Springer-Verlag: Porto, Portugal, 2005.
38. Ullman, J., An algorithm for subgraph isomorphism. /. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 23, 31-42.
39. Soulet, A.; Klema, J.; Cremilleux, B., Efficient mining under rich constraints derived from various datasets. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Knowledge discovery in inductive databases, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2007.
40. Cuissard, B.; Poezevara, G.; Cremilleux, B.; Lepailleur, A.; Bureau, R., Emerging Patterns as Structural Alerts for Computational Toxicology. Dong, G. & Bailey, J., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group: 2012.
41. Calders, T.; Rigotti, C; Boulicaut, J. F. A Sur-vey on Condensed Representations for Frequent Sets. In Computer Science, Constraint-Based Mining and Inductive Databases, volume 3848 of lecture Notes. Boulicaut, J. F., De Raedt, L. & Heikki Mannila, Eds.;. Springer Berlin /Heidelberg: 2005; pp 64-80.
42. Sherhod, R.; Gillet, V. J.; Judson, P. N.; Vessey, J. D., Automating Knowledge Discovery for Toxicity Prediction Using Jumping Emerging Pattern Mining. /. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012.
43. Dong, G.; Bailey, J., Contrast Data Mining: Concepts, Algorithms and Applications. Chapman & Hall/CRC Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series: 2012.