Stuck in the out-group: Jennifer can't grow up, jane's invisible, and janet's over the hill

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 481-484

  Kaatz, Anna ^a   Carnes, Molly ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^c WILLIAM S MIDDLETON MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATIVITY; DECISION MAKING; GENDER BIAS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION; STEREOTYPY;

CAREER MOBILITY; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; PHYSICIANS, WOMEN; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; SEXISM; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 84902193383     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: 1931843X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4766     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Jolliff L, Leadley J, Coakley E, Sloane R. Women in U.S. academic medicine and science: Statistics and benchmarking report, 2011-2012. Washington, DC: AAMC, 2012:6-10
2. National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Engineering Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007
3. Valian V. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1999:126-144
4. Hill C, Corbett C, St Rose A.Why so fewwomen in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW, 2010:38-42
5. Heilman ME, Haynes MC. Subjectivity in the appraisal process: A facilitator of gender bias in work settings. In: Borgida E, Fiske ST, eds. Beyond common sense: Psychological science in the courtroom. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008:127-155
6. Biernat MB. Stereotypes and shifting standards: Forming, communicating and translating person impressions. In: Devine PG, Plant A, eds. Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2012:1-50
7. Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:16474-16479
8. Kramer RM, Leonardelli GJ, Livingston RW. Social cognition, social identity, and intergroup relations. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis, 2011
9. Carnes M, Devine PG, Isaac C, et al. Promoting institutional change through bias literacy. J Divers High Educ 2012;5:63-77
10. Ridgeway CL, Bourg C. Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In: L Eagly, AH, Beall, AE, Sternberg, RJ, eds. The psychology of gender, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2004:217-241
11. Correll S, Ridgeway C. Expectation states theory. In: Delamater J, ed. Handbook of social psychology. New York: Springer, 2006:29-51
12. Poppas A, Cummings J, Dorbala S, Douglas PS, Foster E, Limacher MC. Survey results: A decade of change in professional life in cardiology. A 2008 report of the ACC Women in Cardiology Council. J Am Coll Card 2008;52: 2215-2226
13. Boulis A, Jacobs J, Veloski JJ. Gender segregation by specialty during medical school. Acad Med 2001;76:S65-S67. (Pubitemid 32954267
14. Davis G, Allison R. Increasing representation, maintaining hierarchy: An assessment of gender and medical specialization. Soc Thought Res 2013;32
15. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, DeCastro RA, Ubel P. Sex, role models, and specialty choices among graduates of U.S. medical schools in 2006-2008. J Am Coll Surgeons 2014; m218:345-352
16. Shollen SL, Bland CJ, Finstad DA, Taylor AL. Organizational climate and family life: How these factors affect the status of women faculty at one medical school. Acad. Med. 2009;84:87-94
17. Jackson D, Engstrom E, Emmers-Sommer T. Think leader, think male and female: Sex vs. seating arrangement as leadership cues. Sex Roles 2007;57:713-723
18. Porter N, Geis F, Jennings J. Are women invisible as leaders? Sex Roles 1983;9:1035-1049
19. Heilman ME. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. J Soc Issues 2001;57:657-674. (Pubitemid 33122391
20. Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC, Van Engen ML. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-Analysis comparing women and men. Psychol Bull 2003;129:569
21. Heilman ME, Haynes MC. No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women's success in malefemale teams. J Appl Psychol 2005;90:905
22. Uhlmann EL, CohenGL. Constructed criteria redefiningmerit to justify discrimination. Psychol Sci 2005;16:474-480
23. Bunton SA, Corrice AM. Evolving workplace flexibility for U.S. medical school tenure-Track faculty. Acad Med 2011; m86:481-485
24. Krupat E, Pololi L, Schnell ER, Kern DE. Changing the culture of academic medicine: The C-Change learning action network and its impact at participating medical schools. Acad Med 2013;88:1252-1258
25. Pati S, Reum J, Conant E, et al. Tradition meets innovation: Transforming academic medical culture at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine. Acad Med 2013;88:461-464
26. Valantine H, Sandborg CI. Changing the culture of academic medicine to eliminate the gender leadership gap: 50/ 50 by 2020. Acad Med 2013;88:1411-1413
27. Morahan PS, Rosen SE, Richman RC, Gleason KA. The leadership continuum: A framework for organizational and individual assessment relative to the advancement of women physicians and scientists. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011;20:387-396.