Life-cycle Water Quantity and Water Quality Implications of Biofuels

Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 3-10

  Wu, May ^a   Zhang, Zhonglong ^b   Chiu, Yi wen ^a  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b US ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Climate; Landscape management; Life cycle water use; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Suspended sediments; Water consumption; Water footprint; Water quality; Watershed modeling

Indexed keywords

BIOFUELS; CLIMATE CHANGE; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

ALTERNATIVE WATER RESOURCE; BIOFUEL FEEDSTOCKS; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; GEO-SPATIAL ANALYSIS; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT; WATERSHED MODELING;

WATER RESOURCES;

EID: 84902176814     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21963010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40518-013-0001-2     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Gheewala SH, Silalertruksa T, Nilsalab P, Mungkung R, Perret SR, Chaiyawannakarn N. Implications of the biofuels policy mandate in Thailand on water: The case of bioethanol. Bioresour Technol. 2013;150:457–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.052
2. Islam S. Implications of biofuel policies for water management in India. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2012;28(4):601–13. DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2012.694149
3. Oehlschlaeger MAH, Sexton MN. Prospects for biofuels: A review, Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications. 2013;5(2), Article number: 021006.
4. Fontaras G, Skoulou V, Zanakis G, Zabaniotou A, Samaras Z. Integrated environmental assessment of energy crops for biofuel and energy production in Greece. Renew Energy. 2012;43:201–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.12.010
5. Chanakya HN, Mahapatra DM, Ravi S, Chauhan VS, Abitha R. Sustainability of large-scale algal biofuel production in India. Journal of Indian Institute of Science. 2012;92(1):63–98.
6. Nunez M, Pfister S, Anton A, Munoz P, Hellweg S, Koehler A, et al. Assessing the environmental impact of water consumption by energy crops grown in Spain. J Ind Ecology. 2013;17(1):90–102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00449.x
7. Chiu Y, Wu M. Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:9155–62. DOI: 10.1021/es3002162
8. Wu M, Chiu Y, Demissie Y. Quantifying the regional water footprint of biofuel production by incorporating hydrologic modeling. Water Resource Research. 2012;48(10):W10518. Excellent review of major life-cycle water footprint assessments for biofuels. Analysis demonstrated that system boundary and water allocation are key to consistent water footprint accounting. Study improved life-cycle water consumption analysis by watershed modeling and satellite data verification. DOI: 10.1029/2011WR011809
9. Chiu Y, Wu M. Water footprint of biofuel produced from forest wood residue via a mixed alcohol gasification process. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013;8(3). Good study illustrating variability of life-cycle water consumption of wood-based biofuel in two different feedstock logistic systems and feedstock mix in the southeastern US. Analysis reveals low blue and grey water requirements for the forest wood-derived biofuels.
10. Chiu Y-W, Wu M. Considering water availability and wastewater resources in the development of algal bio-oil. BioFPR. 2013;7(4):406–415. July/Aug.
11. Venteris ER, Skaggs RL, Coleman AM, Wigmosta MS. A GIS cost model to assess the availability of freshwater, seawater, and saline groundwater for algal biofuel production in the United States. ES&T. 2013;47(9):4840–9. DOI: 10.1021/es304135b
12. Hagman J, Nerentorp M, Arvidsson R, Molander S. Do biofuels require more water than do fossil fuels? Life cycle-based assessment of jetropha oil production in rural Mozambique. J Clean Prod. 2013;53:176–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.039
13. Zhuang Q, Qin Z, Chen M. Biofuel, land and water: Maize, switchgrass or miscanthus? ERL. 2013;8(1) 015020:1–6.
14. VanLoocke A, Twine TE, Zeri M, Bernacchi CJ. A regional comparison of water use efficiency for miscanthus, switchgrass and maize. Agric For Meteorol. 2012;164:82–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.05.016
15. Beal CM, Hebner RE, Webber ME, Ruoff RS, Seibert AF, King CW. Comprehensive evaluation of algal biofuel production: Experimental and target results. Energies. 2012;5(6):1943–81. DOI: 10.3390/en5061943
16. Vasudevan V, Stratton RW, Pearlson MN, Jersey GR, Beyene AG, Weissman JC, et al. Environmental performance of algal biofuel technology options. ES&T. 2012;46(4):2451–9. DOI: 10.1021/es2026399
17. Ceclan RE, Pop A, Ceclan M. Studies concerning the integrated use of sweet sorghum for bioethanol production in Romania. Chem Eng Trans. 2012;29:877–82.
18. Staples MD, Olcay H, Malina R, Trivedi P, Pearlson MN, Strzepek K, et al. Water consumption footprint and land requirements of large-scale alternative diesel and jet fuel production. ES&T. 2013. doi:10.1021/es4030782.
19. Cibin R, Chaubey I, Engel B. Simulated watershed scale impacts of corn stover removal for biofuel on hydrology and water quality. Hydrological processes. 2012;26(11):1629–41. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8280
20. Wu M, Demissie Y, Yan E. Simulated impact of future biofuel production on water quality and water cycle dynamics in the UMRB. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;41:44–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.030
21. Wu Y, Liu S. Impacts of biofuels production alternatives on water quantity and quality in the Iowa River Basin. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;36:182–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.030
22. Demissie Y, Yan E, Wu M. Assessing regional hydrology and water quality implications of large-scale biofuel feedstock production in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. ES&T. 2012;46(16):9174–82. DOI: 10.1021/es300769k
23. Bosch DD, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Vellidis G, Srivastava P. Watershed-scale impact of land use changes for bioenergy production. ASABE-21st century Watershed Technology Conference and Workshop 2012: Improve Water Quality and Environment. May 27–June 1, 2012, pp. 89–96.
24. Dalla Marta A, Mancini M, Natali F, Orlando F, Orlandini S. From water to bioethanol: The impact of climate variability on the water footprint. Journal of Hydrology. 2012;444–445:180–186, June 11.
25. Gramig BM, Reeling CJ, Cibin R, Chaubey I. Environmental and economic trade-offs in a watershed when using corn stover as bioenergy. ES&T. 2013;47(4):1784–91. Good study demonstrating a method to select crop residue harvest operation based on economic and water quality criteria, determined from field testing data. DOI: 10.1021/es303459h
26. Einheuser MD, Nejadhashemi AP. Woznicki SA. Biomass and Bioenergy: Simulating stream health sensitivity to landscape change due to bioenergy crops expansion; 2013. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.025.
27. Wu Y, Liu S, Gallant AL. Predicting impacts of increased CO2 and climate change on the water cycle and water quality in the semiarid James River Basin of the Midwestern USA. Sci Total Environ. 2012;430:150–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.058
28. Wu Y, Liu S, Abdul-Aziz OI. Hydrological effects of the increased CO2 and climate change in the UMRB using a modified SWAT. Climate Change. 2012;110:977–1003. Good study exploring the effect of increased CO2 on hydrology and crop water use in biofuel feedstock dominant watersheds, based on historical climate and hydrological data, indicating the potential of climate change on life-cycle water consumption. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0087-8
29. Li R, Merchant JW. Modeling vulnerability of groundwater to pollution under future scenarios of climate change and biofuels-related land use change: A case study in North Dakota. USA Science of the Total Environment. 2013;447:32–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.011
30. Taheripour F, Hertel TW, Liu J. The role of irrigation in determining the global land use impacts of biofuels. Energy, Sustainability and Society. 2013;3(1):1–18. DOI: 10.1186/2192-0567-3-4
31. Anderson CJ, Anex RP, Arritt RW, Gelder BK, Khanal S, Herzmann DE, et al. Regional climate impacts of a biofuel policy projection. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40(6):1217–22. DOI: 10.1002/grl.50179
32. Eranki PL, Manowitz DH, Bals BD, Izaurralde RC, Kim S, Dale BE. The watershed scale optimized and rearranged landscape design (WORLD) model and local biomass processing depots for sustainable biofuel production: Integrated life cycle assessment. BioFBR. 2013;7(5):537–50. Excellent study that demonstrates that the negative effect of increased feedstock production on water quality can be minimized economically by implementing a mixed feedstock, including crop residue and perennial grasses under BMPs and a double-cropping system.
33. Bernardi A, Giarola S, Bezzo F. Optimizing the economics and the carbon and water footprints of bioethanol supply chains. BioFPR. 2012;6(6):656–72.
34. Yang Y. Life cycle freshwater ecotoxicity, human health cancer, and noncancer impacts of corn ethanol and gasoline in the U.S. J of Cleaner Production. 2013;53:149–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.009
35. Chiu Y-W, Suh S, Pfister S, Hellweg S, Koehler A. Measuring ecological impact of water consumption by bioethanol using life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2012;17:16–24. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-011-0328-0
36. King CW, Webber ME. Water intensity of transportation. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(21):7866–72. DOI: 10.1021/es800367m
37. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY, van der Meer TH. The water footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(25):10219–23. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812619106
38. Wu M, Mintz M, Wang M, Arora S. Water consumption in the production of ethanol and petroleum gasoline. Environ Manag. 2009;44:981–97. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9370-0
39. Mishra GS, Yeh S. Life cycle water consumption and withdrawal requirements of ethanol from corn grain and residues. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(10):4563–9. Good study incorporating irrigation technology and water delivery into water footprint accounting. DOI: 10.1021/es104145m
40. Scown CD, Horvath A, McKone TE. Water footprint of U.S. transportation fuels. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(7):2541–53. DOI: 10.1021/es102633h
41. Wu M, Mintz M, Wang M, Arora S, Chiu Y. Water consumption in the production of bioethanol and petroleum gasoline. ANL/ESD 2011-update. 2011. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA. Good analysis of process-based water consumption in the use of conventional petroleum and biofuels in major life-cycle stages with recent production datasets.
42. Kesava Rao AVR, Wani SP, Singh P, Srinivas K, Srinivasa Rao C. Water requirement and use by Jatropha curas in a semi-arid tropical location. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;39:175–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.013
43. Kothari R, Pathak V, Kumar V, Singh DP. Experimental study for growth potential of unicellular alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa on dairy wastewater: An integrated approach for treatment and biofuel production. Bioresour Technol. 2012;16:466–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.121
44. Anderson V, Broberg S, Hackl R. Integrated algae cultivation for municipal wastewater treatment and biofuels production in industrial clusters. 2012. World Renewable Energy Forum, WREF 2012, World Renewable Energy Congress XII and Colorado Renewable Energy Society Annual Conference. American Solar Energy Society. 2012;1:684–91.
45. Roberts GW, Fortier MP, Sturm BSM, Stagg-Williams SM. Promising pathway for algal biofuels through wastewater cultivation and hydrothermal conversion. Energy and Fuels. 2013;27(2):857–67. DOI: 10.1021/ef3020603
46. Muth Jr D, Bryden KM. A conceptual evaluation of sustainable variable-rate agricultural residue removal. Jeq. 2012;41:1796–805.
47. Wilhelm WW, Hess JR, Karlen DL, Johnson JMF, Muth D, Baker JM, et al. Balancing limiting factors and economic drivers for sustainable Midwestern US agricultural residue feedstock supplies. Industrial Biotechnol. 2010;6(5):271–87. DOI: 10.1089/ind.2010.6.271
48. Wu Y, Liu S, Li Z. Identifying potential areas for biofuel production and evaluating the environmental effects: a case study of the James River Basin in the Midwestern U.S. GCB Bioenergy. 2012;4:875–88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01164.x
49. Wagle P, Kakani VG. Growing season variability in ET, ecosystem water use efficiency, and energy npartitioning in switchgrass. Ecohydrology. 2012. doi:10.1002/eco.1322.
50. Xu X, Scanlon BR, Schilling K, Sun A. Relative importance of climate and land surface changes on hydrologic changes in the US Midwest since the 1930s: Implications for biofuel production. J Hydrol. 2013;497:110–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.041
51. U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. RD Perlack, BJ Stokes (Leads). ORNL/TM-2011/224. 2011. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. 227 p.
52. Vanloocke A, Betzelberger AM, Ainsworth EA, Bernacchi CJ. Rising ozone concentrations decrease soybean evapotranspiration and water use efficiency whilst increasing canopy temperature. New Phytol. 2012;195:164–71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04152.x
53. Thomson B. Energy, water and arid southwest: resources and challenges. Proceedings of the 2012 Congress, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries. P2803-2813. Environ. Water. Res. Ins. ASCE. May 20–24.