Intellectual structure of the institutional repository field: A co-word analysis

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 386-397

  Cho, Jane ^a  

^a SolarLight Ltd   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Clustering; Co word analysis; Institutional repository; Intellectual structure; MDS

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CLUSTERING; CO-WORD ANALYSIS; INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURES; MDS;

INFORMATION SERVICES;

EID: 84902166859     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551514524686     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bastos F, Vidotti S and Oddone N. The University and its libraries: Reactions and resistance to scientific publishers. Information Services and Use 2011; 31(3-4): 121-129.
2. Perry CM. Archiving of publicly funded research data: A survey of Canadian researchers. Government Information Quarterly 2008; 25(1): 133-148.
3. Swan A. The communication of science and technology in a sustainable future. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 2009; 6(1): 1-10.
4. Thomas G. Evaluating the impact of the institutional repository or positioning innovation between a rock and a hard place. New Review of Information Networking 2007; 13(2): 133-146.
5. Armstrong M and Stringfellow J. Promoting faculty scholarship through the university author recognition bibliography at Boise State University. New Review of Academic Librarianship 2012; 18 (2): 165-175.
6. Cassella M and Morando M. Fostering new roles for librarians: Skills set for repository managers-results of a survey in Italy. LIBER Quarterly 2012; 21(3-4): 407-428.
7. Khan S, Usman A, Irfan R and Hayat A. DSpace@SEECS: SEECS institutional repository system. In: 7th international conference on emerging technologies, ICET, Pakistan, Islamabad, 2011, pp. 1-6.
8. Cheng Y and Chun L. Localization retrieval and browse of a dSpace-based institutional repository system. Advanced Materials Research 2011; 268-270; 1401-1406.
9. Baba K et al. Evaluation of a/the? link system between repository and researcher database. In: ICADL11 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Asia-pacific digital libraries. Berlin: Springer, 2011, pp. 381-382.
10. Oppenheim C. Electronic scholarly publishing and open access. Journal of Information Science 2008; 34(4): 577-590.
11. Mircea G. OZone: A shared institutional repository service. New Review of Information Networking 2005; 11(2): 201-211.
12. Haslhofer B and Schandl B. Interweaving OAI-PMH data sources with the Linked Data cloud. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 2010; 5(1):17-31.
13. Costanza J, Knight RC and Liu-Spencer H. Metadata implementation for building cross-institutional repositories: Lessons learned from the liberal arts scholarly repository (LASR). Journal of Library Metadata 2009; 9(1-2): 153-166.
14. Salo D. Name authority control in institutional repositories. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2009; 47(3-4): 249-261.
15. Paradelo LAM. Documentary preservation in institutional repositories. Investigacion Bibliotecologica 2009; 23(49): 241-257.
16. Watterworth M. Planting seeds for a successful institutional repository: Role of the archivist as manager, designer, and policymaker. Journal of Archival Organization 2009; 7(1-2): 24-32.
17. Frank CH. Digital learning object repositories. OCLC Systems and Services 2012; 28(1): 14-16.
18. Gore SA. E-science and data management resources on the web. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2011; 30(2): 167-177.
19. Bohemier KA et al. Content analysis of institutional data policies. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries, New York, 2011, pp. 409-410.
20. McDonald RH and Thomas C. The case for standardized reporting and assessment requirements for institutional repositories. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 2008; 20(2): 101-109.
21. Bailey CW. Institutional Repository Bibliography, http://digital- scholarship.org/irb/irb.html (2013, accessed March 2013).
22. Ding Y, Chowdhury GG and Foo S. Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Proccessing and Management 2000;37(6):817-842.
23. Callon M, Coutial JP and Laville F. Co-word analysis as tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 1991; 22(1): 153-203.
24. Kwon J et al. Analysis of EA (enterprise architecture) research trend using co-word analysis. Information Architecture Research 2010; 7(1): 31-17.
25. Peters HPF and Van Raan AFJ. Co-word based science maps of chemical engineering. Part 2: combined clustering and multidimensional scaling. Research Policy 1993; 22: 47-71.
26. Kim M et al. Extraction of framework of digital finance research through co-word analysis. Internet Electronic Commerce Research 2011; 11(1): 83-99.
27. Courtial JP, Callon M and Sigogneau M. Is indexing trustworthy? Classification of articles through co-word analysis. Journal of Information Science 1984; 9: 47-56.
28. Lee U et al. A study on the emerging technology mapping through co-word analysis. International Journal of Management Science 2006; 23(3): 77-93.
29. Lee M. The study on exploration of intellectual structure of artificial intelligence field using Co-word analysis. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, 2003.
30. Green PE, Camone FJ Jr and Smith SM. Multidimensional scaling: Concepts and applications. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1989.
31. Lee J. A comparison analysis of various approaches to multidimensional scaling in mapping a knowledge domains intellectual structure. The Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science 2007; 41(2): 335-357.
32. Ishikawa KB et al. Design considerations for a clinical data repository capable of meeting needs of CHR and inter-institutional information exchange. Japan Journal of Medical Informatics 1997; 17(3 suppl): 241-245.
33. Soehner CB. The eScholarship Repository: A university of California response to the scholarly communication crisis. Science and Technology Libraries 2001; 22(3-4): 29-37.