Archiving of publicly funded research data: A survey of Canadian researchers

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 133-148

  Perry, Carol Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Access; Archive; Archiving; Canadian; Institutional repositories; Policy; Preservation; Public funding; Research data; Researchers

Indexed keywords

EID: 36849006927     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barton M.R. Creating an institutional repository: LEADIRS workbook (2004), MIT Libraries, Cambridge, MA. http://dspace.org/implement/leadirs.pdf#search='creating%20an%20institutional%20repository' Retrieved July 11, 2005, from http://dspace.org/implement/leadirs.pdf#search='creating%20an%20institutional%20repository'
2. Canada. Task Force for the National Consultation on Access to Scientific Research Data (2005). Report of the Consultation on Access to Scientific Research Data: Final report. Retrieved November 10, 2005, from http://ncasrd-cnadrs.scitech.gc.ca/NCASRDReport_e.pdf
3. Crow R. The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper (2002), ARL Publications, Annapolis Junction, MD (Bimonthly No. 223)
4. Foster N.F., and Gibbons S. Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine 11 1 (2005). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/fox/01fox.html July 12, 2005. Retrieved July 12, 2005, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/fox/01fox.html
5. Green A.G., and Gutmann M.P. Building partnerships among social science researchers, institution-based repositories, and domain specific data archives. OCLC Systems and Services. International Digital Library Perspectives 23 (2007) 35-53. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41214 http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/41214
6. Hedstrom, M. (2006, May). Producing archive-ready datasets: Compliance, incentive and motivation. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association for Social Science Information Service and Technology, Ann Arbor, MI.
7. Lynch C.A. Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL Bimonthly Report 226 (2003). http://www.arl.org/newsltr/ May 31 2005. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/
8. Museums, Libraries and Archives Council. Digital preservation in the regions (2005), MLA Publications, London (Electronic edition)
9. National Science Board. (2005). Long-lived digital data collections: Enabling research and education in the 21st century (Draft). Retrieved June 24, 2005, from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2005/LLDDC_report.pdf
10. OCLC/RLG PREMIS Working Group. (2004). Implementing preservation repositories for digital materials: Current practice and emerging trends in the cultural heritage community. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center Inc. Retrieved June 2, 2005, from the OCLC First Search database.
11. OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata. (2002). Scoping study for a DCC metadata standards registry. Dublin, OH: Online Computer Library Center, Inc. (Electronic version) June 1, 2005, from the OCLC First Search database.
12. OECD. (2004). Declaration on access to research data from public funding. Retrieved November 12, 2005, from http://www.oecd.org/document/0,2340,en_2649_34487_25998799_1_1_1_1,00.html
13. Patel, M. (2004). Scoping study for a DCC metadata standards registry (draft. Edinburgh: DCC. June 2, 2005, from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/docs/Scoping_Study_for_a_DCC_Metadata_Standards_Registry.pdf
14. Peters T.A. Consortial speaking-digital repositories: Individual, discipline-based, institutional, consortial, or national?. [electronic version]. Journal of Academic Librarianship 28 6 (2002) 414-417
15. Pienta, A. (2006) The LEADS database at ICPSR: Identifying important social science studies for archiving. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association for Social Science Information Service and Technology, Ann Arbor, MI.
16. Shearer, K. (2004). Survey results-Summer 2004. CARL institutional repositories project [Electronic version]. Retrieved June 7, 2005, from http://www.carl-abrc.ca/projects/institutional_repositories/pdf/survey_results_2004-e.pdf
17. Simpson, D. (2004). National assessment survey for the digital preservation coalition. Retrieved June 2, 2005, from http://www.dpconline.org/docs/reports/dpcsurvey.pdf
18. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2001). National Research Data Archive Consultation Phase One: Needs assessment report. Retrieved October 30, 2005, from http://www.sshrc.ca/web/about/publications/da_phase1_e.pdf
19. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2002a). National Research Data Archive Consultation Final Report: Building infrastructure for access to and preservation of research data. Retrieved November 5, 2005, from http://www.sshrc.ca/web/about/publications/da_finalreport_e.pdf
20. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2002b). SSHRC Research Data Archiving Policy. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://www.sshrc.ca/web/about/policies/edata_e.asp
21. Waller M., and Sharpe R. Mind the gap: Assessing digital preservation needs in the U.K. (2006), Digital Preservation Coalition, Heslington, YORK. http://www.dpconline.org/docs/reports/uknamindthegap.pdf Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://www.dpconline.org/docs/reports/uknamindthegap.pdf
22. Yakel E. Archives and manuscripts: Digital assets for the next millennium. [electronic version]. OCLC Systems and Services 3 (2004) 102-105 (Retrieved June 2, 2005, from the OCLC First Search database)