The influence of modality and transparency on trust in human-robot interaction

2014 IEEE International Inter-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support, CogSIMA 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 156-159

  Sanders, Tracy L ^a   Wixon, Tarita ^a   Schafer, K Elizabeth ^a   Chen, Jessie Y C ^b   Hancock, P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human Robot Interaction; Multi Modal Communication; Transparency; Trust

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS;

COMMUNICATION MODALITIES; CONSTANT LEVEL; EMERGING TOPICS; INFORMATION STREAMS; MULTIMODAL COMMUNICATIONS; TEAM MEMBERS; TRUST; TRUST LEVEL;

TRANSPARENCY;

EID: 84902108762     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CogSIMA.2014.6816556     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. DoD . "Defense budget priorities and choices." 2012
2. D. Dmka, J. M. Nyce, and T. Timpka. "The need for transparency and rationale in automated systems." Interactingwith Computers,. 18, no. 5, pp. 1070-1083, Sept. 2006.
3. K. E. Schaefer, J. G. Cook, J. K. Adams, J. Bell, T. L. Sanders, and P. A. Hancock, "Augmented emotion and hs remote embodiment: the importance of design from fiction to reality," In Proc. HFES Annual Meeting, Massachusetts, 2012, pp. 1817-1821.
4. P. A. Hancock, D. R. Billings, K. E. Schaefer, J. Y. C. Chen, E. J. De Visser, and R. Parasuraman, "A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction," HFES, vol. 53,no. 5, pp. 517-527. Oct. 2011.
5. L. Karsenty and V. Botherel, "Transparency strategies to help users handle system errors," Speech Communication, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 305-324; Mar. 2005.
6. E. Jeannot, C. Kelly, andD. Thompson, "The development of situation awareness measures in ATM systems," Eurocontrol, Brussels, Belgium. 2003.
7. K. Stubbs, P. J. Hinds, and D. Wettergreen. "Autonomy and common ground in human-robot interaction: A field study," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 42-50; Mar. 2007.
8. Cnng, E. A., & Lenfestey, A. G. "Architectmg human operator trust in automation to improve system effectiveness in multiple unmanned aenal vehicles (UAV) control." MS Thesis, School of Engineering & Mgmt, AFIT, Wright-Patterson AFB. Ohio, 2009.
9. T. Kim and P. Hinds. "Who should I blame? Effects of autonomy and transparency on attributions in human-robot interaction," mProc. IEEERO-MAN 200615th International Symposium on Robot and Humanlnteractive Communication, 2006, pp. 80-85.
10. V. Fmomore, K. Satterfield, A. Sitz, C. Castle, G. Funke, T. Shaw, and M. Funke, "Effects of the multimodal communication tool on communication and change detection for command and control operators," in Proc. HFES Annual Meeting. Massachusetts, 2012, pp. 1461-1465.
11. CD. Wickens, "The structure of attentional resources," in Attention and performance VIII. R. Nickerson, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980, pp. 239-257.
12. CD. Wickens (1984). "Processing resources in attention," in R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.). Varieties of attention (pp.63-101). New York: AcademicPress.
13. M. B. Donnellan, F. L. Oswald, B. M. Band, andR. E. Lucas, "The mim-IPIP scales: tmy-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality," Psychological Assessment, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 192-203; Jun. 2006.
14. G. Matthews, and S. E. Campbell. "Task-induced stress and individual differences in coping." In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 821-825. SAGEPublications,1998.
15. K. Schaefer. "The perception and measurement of human robot trust." Doctoral Dissertation, University ofCentralFlorida. 2013.
16. J. Y. Jian, A. M. Bisantz, and C G Drury. "Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems," InternationalJournal of Cognitive Ergonomics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53-71; 2000
17. T. Nomura, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and K Kato. 2006. "Altered attitudes of people toward robots: Investigation through the Negative Attitudes toward Robots Scale." In Proc. AAAI-06 Workshop on Human Implications of Human-Robot Interaction, Boston, MA, 2006, pp. 29-35.
18. E. C Poulton and P. R. Freeman, "Unwanted asymmetrical transfer effects with balanced experimental designs," Psychological Bulletin, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1-19; Jul. 1966.
19. J. D. Lee, B. F. Gore, and J. L. Campbell. "Display alternatives for m-vehicle warning and sign information: Message style, location, and modality," Transportation Human Factors, vol. 1,no. 4, pp. 347-375; 1999.