Public sources of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data: Use in structure-activity relationship models

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Models of Mutagens and Carcinogens

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 145-173

  Richard, Ann M ^a   Williams, ClarLynda R ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902039341     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203010822     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Helma C., Gottmann E., and Kramer S., Knowledge discovery and data mining in toxicology, Statis. Meth. Med. Res., 9, 1, 2000.
2. Richard, A.M. and Benigni, R., AI and SAR approaches for predicting chemical carcinogenicity: survey and status report, SAR QSAR Environ. Toxicol., 13, 1, 2002.
3. Moudgal, C.J., Lipscomb, J.C., and Bruce, R.M., Potential health effects of drinking water disinfection by-products using quantitative structure toxicity relationship, Toxicology, 147, 109, 2000.
4. Enslein, K. et al., A structure-activity prediction model of carcinogenicity based on NCI/NTP assays and food additives, Toxicol. Indus. Health, 3, 267, 1987.
5. Woo, Y.-T. et al., Use of mechanism-based structure-activity relationships analysis in carcinogenic potential ranking for drinking water disinfection by-products, Environ. Health Perspect., 110 (suppl. 1), 75, 2002.
6. Klopman, G., Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 7315, 1984.
7. Klopman, G., MULTICASE 1: a hierarchical computer automated structure evaluation program, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 11, 176, 1992.
8. Klopman, G. and Rosenkranz, H.S., Approaches to SAR in carcinogenesis and mutagenesis. Prediction of carcinogenicity/mutagenicity using MULTI-CASE, Mutat. Res., 305, 33, 1994.
9. Benigni, R., Predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents: the state of the art in light of a comparative exercise, Mutat. Res., 334, 103, 1995.
10. Benfenati, E. and Gini, G., Computational predictive programs (expert systems) in toxicology, Toxicology, 119, 213, 1997.
11. Benigni, R., The first U.S. National Toxicology Program exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results, Mutat. Res., 387, 35, 1997.
12. Benigni, R. and Richard, A.M., Quantitative structure-based modeling applied to characterization and prediction of chemical toxicity, Methods, 14, 264, 1998.
13. Richard, A.M., Structure-based methods for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity: are we there yet?, Mutat. Res., 400, 493, 1998.
14. Greene, N., Computer systems for the prediction of toxicity: an update, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 54, 417, 2002.
15. Brinkhuis, R.P., Toxicology information from U.S. government agencies, Toxicology, 157, 25, 2001.
16. Richard, A.M., Williams, C.R., and Cariello, N.F., Improving structure-linked access to publicly available chemical toxicity information, Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel., 5, 136, 2002.
17. Wexler, P., Introduction to special issue (part II) on digital information and tools, Toxicology, 173, 1, 2002.
18. Young, R.R., Genetic toxicology: web resources, Toxicology, 173, 103, 2002.
19. Junghans, T.B., Cancer information resources: digital and online sources, Toxicology, 173, 13, 2002.
20. Auletta, A.E. et al., Current status of the Gene-Tox Program. Environ. Health Perspect., 96, 33, 1991.
21. Ashby, J. and Tennant, R.W., Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP, Mutat. Res., 257, 229, 1991.
22. Selkirk, J.K. and Soward, S.M., Compendium of abstracts from long-term cancer studies reorted by the National Toxicology Program from 1976 to 1992, Environ. Health Perspect., 101, 1, 1993.
23. Richard, A.M., Application of artificial intelligence and computational methods to predicting toxicity, Knowledge Eng. Rev., 14, 307, 1999.
24. Dearden, J.C. et al., The development and validation of expert systems for predicting toxicity: the report and recommendations of ECVAM/ECB workshop 24, Alternative to Laboratory Animals (ATLA), 25, 223, 1997.
25. Macina, O.T., Zhang, Y.P., and Rosenkranz, H.S., Improved predictivity of chemical carcinogens: the use of a battery of SAR models, in Carcinogenicity: Testing, Predicting, and Interpreting Chemical Effects, Kitchin, K., Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999, chap. 7.
26. Cunningham, A.R. et al., Identification of ‘genotoxic’ and ʼnon-genotoxic’ alerts for cancer in mice: the carcinogenic potency database, Mutat. Res., 398, 1, 1998.
27. Cunningham, A.R. et al., Identification of structural features and associated mechanisms of action for carcinogens in rats, Mutat. Res., 405, 9, 1998.
28. Matthews, E.J. and Contrera, J.F., A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MultiCASE QSAR-ES software, Regulat. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 28, 242, 1998.
29. Zhang, Y.P. et al., Prediction of the carcinogenicity of a second group of chemicals undergoing carcinogenic testing, Environ. Health Perspect., 104, 1045, 1996.
30. Huff, J. et al., Chemicals associated with site-specific neoplasia in 1394 long-term carcinogenesis experiments in laboratory rodents, Environ. Health Perspect., 93, 247, 1991.
31. Ashby, J. and Paton, D., The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures, Mutat. Res., 286, 3, 1993.
32. Benigni, R. and Pino, A., Profiles of chemically-induced tumors in rodents: quantitative relationships, Mutat. Res., 421, 93, 1998.
33. Gold, L.S. et al., Reproducibility of results in ʼnear-replicate’ carcinogenesis bioassays, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 78, 1149, 1987.
34. Gold, L.S., Sloan, T.H., and Ames, B.N., Overview and update of analyses of the carcinogenic potency database, in Handbook of Carcinogenic Potency and Genotoxicity Databases, Gold, L.S. and Zeiger, E., Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1997, 661.
35. Gold L.S. et al., Supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): results of animal bioassays published in the general literature in 1993 to 1994 and by the National Toxicology Program in 1995 to 1996, Environ. Health Perspect., 107 (suppl. 4), 527, 1999.
36. Gold, L.S. et al., Compendium of chemical carcinogens by target organ: results of chronic bioassays in rats, mice, hamsters, dogs, and monkeys, Toxicol. Pathol., 29, 639, 2001.
37. Peto, R., The TD50: a proposed general convention for the numerical description of the carcinogenic potency of chemicals in chronic-exposure animal experiments, Environ. Health Perspect., 58, 1, 1984.
38. Benigni, R. and Passerini, L., Carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines: from structure- activity relationships to mechanisms of action and risk assessment, Mutat. Res., 511, 191, 2002.
39. Gottmann, E. et al., Data quality in predictive toxicology: reproducibility of rodent carcinogenicity experiments, Environ. Health Perspect., 109, 509, 2001.
40. Klopman, G. and Rosenkranz, H.S., Structure-activity relations: maximizing the usefulness of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity databases, Environ. Health Perspect., 96, 67, 1991.
41. Rosenkranz, H.S. et al., Development, characterization, and application of predictivetoxicology models, SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 10, 277, 1999.
42. Takihi, N. et al., An approach for evaluating and increasing the informational content of mutagenicity and clastogenicity data bases, Mutagenicity, 8, 257, 1993.
43. Liu, M. et al., Estimation of the optimal database size for structure-activity analyses: the Salmonella mutagenicity data base, Mutat. Res., 358, 63, 1996.
44. Liu, M. et al., Structure-activity and mechanistic relationships: the effects of chemical overlap on the structural overlap in databases of varying size and composition, Mutat. Res., 372, 79, 1996.
45. Klopman, G. and Rosenkranz, H.S., Quantification of the predictivity of some shortterm assays for carcinogenicity in rodents, Mutat. Res., 253, 237, 1991.
46. Rosenkranz, H.S. et al., Significant differences in the structural basis of the induction of sister chromatid exchanges and chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 16, 149, 1990.
47. Grant, S.G. et al., Modeling the mouse lymphoma forward mutational assay: the Gene-Tox program database, Mutat. Res., 465, 201, 2000.
48. Matthews, E.J., Benz, R.D., and Contrera, J.F., Use of toxicological information in drug design, J. Mol. Graph. Model., 18, 605, 2000.
49. Roberts, G. et al., Leadscope: software for exploring large sets of screening data, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 40, 1302, 2000.
50. Bacha, P.A. et al., Rule extraction from a mutagenicity data set using adaptively grown phylogenetic-like trees, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 42, 1104, 2002.
51. Richard, A.M. and Williams, C.R., Distributed Structure-Searchable Toxicity (DSSTox) public database network: a proposal, Mutat. Res., 499, 27, 2002.