Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: Short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 570-577

  Hara, Masayasu ^a,b   Sng, Kevin ^a,c   Yoo, Byung Eun ^a   Shin, Jae Won ^a   Lee, Dong Won ^a   Kim, Seon Hahn ^a  

^a Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b NAGOYA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c CHANGI GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Rectal cancer; Rectal surgery; Robotics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; DISTANT METASTASIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECTUM CARCINOMA; RECTUM SURGERY; ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERY; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84901983598     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000088     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al.; MRC CR07/NCIC-CTG CO16 Trial Investigators; NCRI Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373:821-828.
2. Choi DJ, Kim SH, Lee PJ, Kim J, Woo SU. Single-stage totally robotic dissection for rectal cancer surgery: technique and short- term outcome in 50 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1824-1830.
3. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187-196.
4. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:240-248.
5. Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, et al. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison-open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg. 2013;257:95-101.
6. Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:415-421.
7. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. Robotic- assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case- matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3195-3202.
8. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASI CC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:75-82.
9. Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, et al. Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1614-1620.
10. Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1480-1487.
11. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al.; Colorectal Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLO R II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLO R II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:210-218.
12. Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2888-2894.
13. Scarpinata R, Aly EH. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:253-262.
14. Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta- analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2095-2101.
15. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al.; MRC CLASI CC trial group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic- assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASI CC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718-1726.
16. Sng KK, Hara M, Shin JW, Yoo BE, Yang KS, Kim SH. The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3297-3307.
17. Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A. Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:882-886.
18. Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L. Short- and medium-term outcome of robot- assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS. 2009;13:176-183.
19. Kang J, Min BS, Park YA, et al. Risk factor analysis of postoperative complications after robotic rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2011;35:2555-2562.
20. Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:48-55.