Reproduction of continuous flow left ventricular assist device experimental data by means of a hybrid cardiovascular model with baroreflex control

Artificial Organs

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 456-468

  Fresiello, Libera ^a,b   Zieliński, Krzysztof ^b   Jacobs, Steven ^c   Di Molfetta, Arianna ^a   Palko, Krzysztof Jakub ^b   Bernini, Fabio ^a   Martin, Michael ^d   Claus, Piet ^c   Ferrari, Gianfranco ^a   Trivella, Maria Giovanna ^a   Górczyńska, Krystyna ^b   Darowski, Marek ^b   Meyns, Bart ^c   Kozarski, Maciej ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE OF BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d CircuLite Inc ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Baroreflex; Hybrid cardiovascular simulator; Hydronumerical; Impedance transformer; Left ventricular assist device; Lumped parameter model

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; FIBER OPTIC SENSORS; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES; LUMPED PARAMETER NETWORKS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; UNLOADING;

BAROREFLEX; CONDITION; CONTINUOUS-FLOW; HAEMODYNAMICS; HYBRID CARDIOVASCULAR SIMULATOR; HYDRONUMERICAL; IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMERS; LEFT VENTRICULAR; LUMPED PARAMETER MODELLING; SUBMODELS;

SIMULATORS;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CARDIOVASCULAR CATHETER; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE THERAPY; HEART FAILURE; HEART LEFT ATRIUM; HYBRID; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; NONHUMAN; PRESSORECEPTOR REFLEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATOR; ANIMAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISEASE MODEL; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHEEP; SWINE; TIME;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMALS; BAROREFLEX; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HEART FAILURE; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHEEP; SWINE; TIME FACTORS; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84901915154     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aor.12178     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Meyns B, Rega P, Ector J, etal. Partial left ventricular support implanted through minimal access surgery as a bridge to cardiac transplant. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:243-245.
2. Meyns B, Simon A, Klotz S, etal. Clinical benefits of partial circulatory support in New York Heart Association Class IIIb and Early Class IV patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39:693-698.
3. Tank J, Heusser K, Malehsa D, etal. Patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices provide insight in human baroreflex physiology. Hypertension 2012;60:849-855.
4. Chen S, Ferreira A, Simaan MA, Boston JR, Antaki JF. Feedback control of an LVAD supporting a failing cardiovascular system regulated by the baroreflex. Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. San Diego, CA, USA, Dec 13-15, 2006.
5. Liu H, Shiraishi Y, Zhang X, etal. Analysis of baroreflex sensitivity during undulation pump ventricular assist device support. Artif Organs 2009;33:561-565.
6. Miyagawa S, Sawa Y, Fukushima N, etal. Analysis of sympathetic nerve activity in end-stage cardiomyopathy patients receiving left ventricular support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20:1181-1187.
7. Shi Y, Korakianitis T, Bowles C. Numerical simulation of cardiovascular dynamics with different types of VAD assistance. J Biomech 2007;40:2919-2933.
8. Timms DL, Greatrex NA, Pearcy MJ, Fraser JF, Steinseifer U. A compact mock circulation loop for the in vitro testing of cardiovascular devices. Artif Organs 2011;35:384-391.
9. Schampaert S, van't Veer M, van de Vosse FN, Pijls NH, de Mol BA, Rutten MC. In vitro comparison of support capabilities of intra-aortic balloon pump and Impella 2.5 left percutaneous. Artif Organs 2011;35:893-901.
10. Kolyva C, Biglino G, Pepper JR, Khir AW. A mock circulatory system with physiological distribution of terminal resistance and compliance: application for testing the intra-aortic balloon pump. Artif Organs 2012;36:E62-70.
11. Zhou J, Armstrong GP, Medvedev AL, Smith WA, Golding LA, Thomas JD. Numeric modeling of the cardiovascular system with a left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J 1999;45:83-89.
12. Baloa LA, Boston JR, Antaki JF. Elastance-based control of a mock circulatory system. Ann Biomed Eng 2001;29:244-251.
13. Colacino FM, Arabia M, Danieli GA, etal. Hybrid test bench for evaluation of any device related to mechanical cardiac assistance. Int J Artif Organs 2005;28:817-826.
14. Ochsner G, Amacher R, Amstutz A, etal. Novel interface for hybrid mock circulations to evaluate ventricular assist devices. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;60:507-516.
15. Kozarski M, Ferrari G, Zieliński K, etal. A hybrid (Hydro-numerical) cardiovascular model: application to investigate continuous-flow pump assistance effect. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2012;32:77-91.
16. Ferrari G, Kozarski M, Zieliński K, etal. A modular computational circulatory model applicable to VAD testing and training. J Artif Organs 2012;15:32-43.
17. Fresiello L, Khir AW, Di Molfetta A, Kozarski M, Ferrari G. Effects of intra-aortic balloon pump timing on baroreflex activities in a closed-loop cardiovascular hybrid model. Artif Organs 2013;37:237-247.
18. Sagawa K, Maughan L, Suga H, Sunagawa K. Cardiac Contraction and the Pressure-Volume Relationship. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
19. Sagawa K, Maughan L, Suga H, Sunagawa K. Chamber pressure-volume relation versus muscle tension-length relaxation. In: Sagawa K, Maughan L, Suga H, Sunagawa K, eds. Cardiac Contraction and the Pressure-Volume Relationship. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988;61-94.
20. Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU, etal. Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:765-773.
21. Kozarski M, Ferrari G, Darowski M, Zielinski K, Palko KJ. Chapter 8: Physical and hybrid models: impedance conversions. In: Darowski M, Ferrari G, eds. Comprehensive Models of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Systems: Their Mechanical Support and Interactions. New York: Nova Science Publ. Inc., 2010;218-226.
22. Ferrari G, Khir AW, Fresiello L, Di Molfetta A, Kozarski M. Hybrid model analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump performance as a function of ventricular and circulatory parameters. Artif Organs 2011;35:902-911.
23. Heldt T, Shim EB, Kamm RD, Mark RG. Computational modeling of cardiovascular response to orthostatic stress. J Appl Physiol 2002;92:1239-1254.
24. Kozarski M, Ferrari G, Zieliński K, etal. A new hybrid electro-numerical model of the left ventricle. Comput Biol Med 2008;38:979-989.
25. Ursino M. Interaction between carotid baroregulation and the pulsating heart: a mathematical model. Am J Physiol 1998;275:1733-1747.
26. Cox RH, Bagshaw RJ. Baroreceptor reflex control of arterial hemodynamics in the dog. Circ Res 1975;37:772-786.
27. Angell James JE, Daly Mde B. Effects of graded pulsatile pressure on the reflex vasomotor responses elicited by changes of mean pressure in the perfused carotid sinus-aortic arch regions of the dog. J Physiol 1971;214:51-64.
28. Shoukas AA, Brunner MC. Epinephrine and the carotid sinus baroreceptor reflex. Influence on capacitive and resistive properties of the total systemic vascular bed of the dog. Circ Res 1980;47:249-257.
29. Brunner MJ, Shoukas AA, Macanespie CL. The effect of the carotid sinus baroreceptor reflex on blood flow and volume redistribution in the total systemic vascular bed of the dog. Circ Res 1981;48:274-285.
30. Sopher SM, Smith ML, Eckberg DL, Fritsch JM, Dibner-Dunlap ME. Autonomic pathophysiology in heart failure: carotid baroreceptor-cardiac reflexes. Am J Physiol 1990;259(3 Pt 2):H689-696.
31. Ursino M, Fiorenzi A, Belardinelli E. The role of pressure pulsatility in the carotid baroreflex control: a computer simulation study. Comput Biol Med 1996;26:297-314.