A large-scale quantitative analysis of latent factors and sentiment in online doctor reviews

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1098-1103

  Wallace, Byron C ^a   Paul, Michael J ^b   Sarkar, Urmimala ^c   Trikalinos, Thomas A ^a   Dredze, Mark ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERNET; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

INTERNET; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84901906820     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002711     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013. Health 2013.
2. Lagu T, Kaufman EJ, Asch DA, et al. Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1642-6.
3. Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, et al. Online reviews of 500 urologists. J Urol 2012;189:2269-73.
4. Greaves F, Ramirez-Cano D, Millett C, et al. Harnessing the cloud of patient experience: using social media to detect poor quality healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:251-5.
5. Paul MJ, Wallace BC, Dredze M. What Affects Patient (Dis) satisfaction? Analyzing Online Doctor Ratings with a Joint Topic-Sentiment Model. AAAI Workshop on Expanding the Boundaries of Health Informatics Using AI (HIAI); 2013.
6. López A, Detz A, Ratanawongsa N, et al. What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:685-92.
7. Segal J, Sacopulos M, Sheets V, et al. Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care? J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e50.
8. Emmert M, Sander U, Pisch F. Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e24.
9. Galizzi MM, Miraldo M, Stavropoulou C, et al. Who is more likely to use doctor-rating websites, and why? A cross-sectional study in London. BMJ Open 2012;2:435-6.
10. Greaves F, Pape UJ, King D, et al. Associations between web-based patient ratings and objective measures of hospital quality. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:435-6.
11. Alemi F, Torii M, Clementz L, et al. Feasibility of real-time satisfaction surveys through automated analysis of patients' unstructured comments and sentiments. Qual Manag Healthc 2012;21:9-19.
12. Greaves F, Ramirez-Cano D, Millett C, et al. Use of sentiment analysis for capturing patient experience from free-text comments posted online. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e239.
13. Lagu T, Goff SL, Hannon NS, et al. A mixed-methods analysis of patient reviews of hospital care in England: implications for public reporting of health care quality data in the United States. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2013;39:7-15.
14. Brody S, Elhadad N. An unsupervised aspect-sentiment model for online reviews. Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010:804-12.
15. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI. Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 2003;3:993-1022.
16. Factorial LDA: Sparse multi-dimensional text models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25; 2012.
17. Paul MJ, Dredze M. Drug extraction from the web: Summarizing drug experiences with multi-dimensional topic models. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT; 2013:168-78.
18. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, 2008.
19. Goodman DC, Fisher ES, Chang C-H, et al. After hospitalization: a Dartmouth atlas report on post-acute care for Medicare beneficiaries. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, 2011:1-52.
20. Goodman DC, Fisher ES, Wennberg J, et al. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Secondary The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, 2013. http://www.dartmouthatlas. org/
21. Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, et al. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:405-11.
22. Schneider EC, Zaslavsky AM, Landon BE, et al. National quality monitoring of Medicare health plans: the relationship between enrollees' reports and the quality of clinical care. Med Care 2001:1313-25.
23. Odigie EG, Marshall R. Quality monitoring of physicians: linking patients' experiences of care to clinical quality and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1784-90.
24. Health Expenditures by State of Residence. Secondary Health Expenditures by State of Residence 2011. http://www.cms.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/resident-state-estimates.zip
25. Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002;15:25-38.
26. Anderson RT, Camacho FT, Balkrishnan R. Willing to wait? The influence of patient wait time on satisfaction with primary care. BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:31.
27. Lyles CR, López A, Pasick R, et al. '5 Mins of Uncomfyness Is Better than Dealing with Cancer 4 a Lifetime': an Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Dialogue on Twitter. J Cancer Educ 2012;28:1-7.