Governance for clinical decision support: Case studies and recommended practices from leading institutions

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 187-194

  Wright, Adam ^a,b,c   Sittig, Dean F ^d   Ash, Joan S ^e   Bates, David W ^a,b,c   Feblowitz, Joshua ^a,c   Fraser, Greg ^f   Maviglia, Saverio M ^a,b,c   McMullen, Carmit ^g   Nichol, W Paul ^h,i   Pang, Justine E ^a   Starmer, Jack ^j   Middleton, Blackford ^a,b,c  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^e OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Mid valley Independent Physicians Association   (United States)

^g CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^h VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79953068386     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002030     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38.
2. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, et al. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765.
3. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742-52.
4. Sittig DF, Wright A, Osheroff JA, et al. Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J Biomed Inform 2008;41:387-92.
5. Wright A, Bates DW, Middleton B, et al. Creating and sharing clinical decision support content with Web 2.0: Issues and examples. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:334-46.
6. Sittig DF, Wright A, Simonaitis L, et al. The state of the art in clinical knowledge management: an inventory of tools and techniques. Int J Med Inform 2009;79:44-57.
7. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:523-30.
8. Morrissey J. Harmonic divergence. Cedars-Sinai joins others in holding off on CPOE. Mod Healthc 2004;34:16.
9. Teich JM, Osheroff JA, Pifer EA, et al; CDS Expert Review Panel. Clinical decision support in electronic prescribing: recommendations and an action plan: report of the joint clinical decision support workgroup. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:365-76.
10. Osheroff JA, Pifer EA, Teich JM, et al. Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer's Guide. Chicago, IL: Health Information Management Systems Society, 2005.
11. Watson HJ, Fuller C, Ariyachandra T. Data warehouse governance: best practices at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina. Decision Support Systems 2004;38:435-50.
12. Burstein F, McKay J, Zyngier S. Knowledge management governance: a multifaceted approach to organizational decision and innovation support. Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Decision Support Systems. Prato, Italy; 2004.
13. Onions PEW, de Langen R. Knowledge Management Governance. Budapest, Hungary: 7th European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM 2006), Cornivus University, 2006.
14. Grant G, Brown A, Uruthirapathy A, et al. An Extended Model of IT Governance: A Conceptual Proposal. Americas Conference on Information Systems. Keystone, Colorado; 2007.
15. Nunes MB, Annansingh F, Eaglestone B, et al. Knowledge management issues in knowledge-intensive SMEs. J Doc 2006;62:101-19.
16. Jacobson DD. Revisiting IT Governance in the Light of Institutional Theory. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. Hawaii: Waikoloa, Big Island, 2009.
17. Middleton B. The clinical decision support consortium. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:26-30.
18. Boxwala A, Rocha B, Maviglia S, et al. Multilayered Knowledge Representation as a Means to Disseminating Knowledge for Use in Clinical Decision-Support Systems. Orlando, FL: Spring AMIA Proc, 2009.
19. Ash J, Sittig DF, Dykstra R, et al. Identifying best practices for clinical decision support and knowledge management in the field. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;160:806-10.
20. McMullen C, Ash J, Sittig D, et al. Rapid assessment of clinical information systems in the healthcare setting: an efficient method for time-pressed evaluation. Methods Inf Med 2010;50(2).
21. Osheroff J, Pifer E, Teich J, et al. Improving Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer's Guide. Chicago, IL: HIMSS, 2005.
22. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, et al. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:5-11.
23. Abookire SA, Teich JM, Sandige H, et al. Improving allergy alerting in a computerized physician order entry system. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:2-6.
24. Paterno MD, Maviglia SM, Gorman PN, et al. Tiering drugedrug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:40-6.
25. Palchuk MB, Seger DL, Alexeyev A, et al. Implementing renal impairment and geriatric decision support in ambulatory e-prescribing. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:1071.
26. Miller RA. Computer-assisted diagnostic decision support: history, challenges, and possible paths forward. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009; (14 Suppl 1):89-106.
27. Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Guappone KP, et al. Overdependence on technology: an unintended adverse consequence of computerized provider order entry. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:94-8.
28. Ganda OP. Refining lipoprotein assessment in diabetes: apolipoprotein B makes sense. Endocr Pract 2009;15:370-6.
29. Sittig DF, Campbell E, Guappone K, et al. Recommendations for monitoring and evaluation of in-patient computer-based provider order entry systems: results of a Delphi survey. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:671-5.
30. Sittig DF, Wright A, Simonaitis L, et al. The state of the art in clinical knowledge management: an inventory of tools and techniques. Int J Med Inform 2010;79(1):44-57.
31. Miller RA, Waitman LR, Chen S, et al. The anatomy of decision support during inpatient care provider order entry (CPOE): empirical observations from a decade of CPOE experience at Vanderbilt. J Biomed Inform 2005;38:469-85.
32. Geissbuhler A, Miller RA. Distributing knowledge maintenance for clinical decisionsupport systems: the 'knowledge library' model. Proc AMIA Symp 1999:770-4.
33. Chiu KW, Miller RA. Developing an advisor predicting inpatient hypokalemia: a negative study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:910.
34. Goldman DS, Colecchi J, Hongsermeier TM, et al. Knowledge management and content integration: a collaborative approach. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:953.
35. Kuperman GJ, Marston E, Paterno M, et al. Creating an enterprise-wide allergy repository at Partners HealthCare System. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:376-80.
36. Fung CH, Tsai JS, Lulejian A, et al. An evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's clinical reminders system: a national survey of generalists. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:392-8.
37. Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hogan MM, et al. Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:938-45.