Learning curve and early clinical outcomes for a robotic surgery novice performing robotic single site cholecystectomy

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 203-207

  Angus, Andrew A ^a   Sahi, Saad L ^a   Mcintosh, Bruce B ^b  

^a OAKLAND UNIVERSITY WILLIAM BEAUMONT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy; Novice; Robotic surgery; Single site

Indexed keywords

TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL OUTCOME; GALL BLADDER; LEARN+; LEARNING CURVES; NOVICE; ROBOTICS SURGERY; SINGLE SITES;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT DYSKINESIA; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; CONSTIPATION; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER PERFORATION; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; ROBOTIC SINGLE SITE CHOLECYSTECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SEROMA; UMBILICAL HERNIA; URINE RETENTION; EDUCATION; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TEACHING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901831647     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1540     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(6): 1648-1655.
2. Wren SM, Curet MJ. Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 2011; 146(10): 1122-1127.
3. Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, et al. First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci single-site platform. Surg Endosc 2011; 25(11): 3566-3573.
4. Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Wagner OJ, et al. Set-up and docking of the da Vinci surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience. Int J Med Robot 2010; 6(1): 57-60.
5. Muhlmann G, Klaus A, Kirchmayr W, et al. Da Vinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric surgery: is it justified in a routine setting? Obes Surg 2003; 13(6): 848-854.
6. Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, et al. Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. J Surg Res 2006; 136(2): 172-178.
7. Morel P, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Robotic single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Robot Surg 2012; 6(3): 273-274.
8. Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, et al. Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15(12): 2182-2186.
9. Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(4): 1116-1121.
10. ® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(9): 2687-2694.
11. Raakow R, Jacob DA. Single-incision cholecystectomy in about 200 patients. Minim Invasive Surg 2011; 2011: 915735.
12. Wang Z, Huang X, Zheng Q. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2012; 82(12): 885-889.