메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 82, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 885-889

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis

Author keywords

CLC; General surgery; GSD; Hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery; SILC

Indexed keywords

CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW;

EID: 84870362483     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06284.x     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (16)

References (24)
  • 1
    • 77955516562 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    • Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G etal. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg. Endosc. 2010; 24: 1842-1848.
    • (2010) Surg. Endosc. , vol.24 , pp. 1842-1848
    • Tsimoyiannis, E.C.1    Tsimogiannis, K.E.2    Pappas-Gogos, G.3
  • 2
    • 77956160914 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single-port laparoscopic surgery
    • Tsai AY, Selzer DJ. Single-port laparoscopic surgery. Adv. Surg. 2010; 44: 1-27.
    • (2010) Adv. Surg. , vol.44 , pp. 1-27
    • Tsai, A.Y.1    Selzer, D.J.2
  • 3
    • 70349603439 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience
    • Chow A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P. Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience. Surg. Innov. 2009; 16: 211-217.
    • (2009) Surg. Innov. , vol.16 , pp. 211-217
    • Chow, A.1    Purkayastha, S.2    Paraskeva, P.3
  • 4
    • 77649191725 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Homemade transumbilical port: an alternative access for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS)
    • Tai HC, Lin CD, Wu CC, Tsai YC, Yang SS. Homemade transumbilical port: an alternative access for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Surg. Endosc. 2010; 24: 705-708.
    • (2010) Surg. Endosc. , vol.24 , pp. 705-708
    • Tai, H.C.1    Lin, C.D.2    Wu, C.C.3    Tsai, Y.C.4    Yang, S.S.5
  • 5
    • 70349774720 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview
    • Romanelli JR, Earle DB. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg. Endosc. 2009; 23: 1419-1427.
    • (2009) Surg. Endosc. , vol.23 , pp. 1419-1427
    • Romanelli, J.R.1    Earle, D.B.2
  • 6
    • 67349201109 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    • Langwieler TE, Nimmesgern T, Back M. Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg. Endosc. 2009; 23: 1138-1141.
    • (2009) Surg. Endosc. , vol.23 , pp. 1138-1141
    • Langwieler, T.E.1    Nimmesgern, T.2    Back, M.3
  • 7
    • 67349199159 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single-port-access cholecystectomy: history should not be allowed to repeat
    • Connor S. Single-port-access cholecystectomy: history should not be allowed to repeat. World J. Surg. 2009; 33: 1020-1021.
    • (2009) World J. Surg. , vol.33 , pp. 1020-1021
    • Connor, S.1
  • 12
    • 57049146424 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A simple technical option for single-port cholecystectomy
    • Mutter D, Leroy J, Cahill R, Marescaux J. A simple technical option for single-port cholecystectomy. Surg. Innov. 2008; 15: 332-333.
    • (2008) Surg. Innov. , vol.15 , pp. 332-333
    • Mutter, D.1    Leroy, J.2    Cahill, R.3    Marescaux, J.4
  • 13
    • 55649103202 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status
    • Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M etal. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur. Urol. 2008; 54: 1020-1029.
    • (2008) Eur. Urol. , vol.54 , pp. 1020-1029
    • Canes, D.1    Desai, M.M.2    Aron, M.3
  • 14
    • 49849086937 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the TriPort system: a case report
    • Romanelli JR, Mark L, Omotosho PA. Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the TriPort system: a case report. Surg. Innov. 2008; 15: 223-228.
    • (2008) Surg. Innov. , vol.15 , pp. 223-228
    • Romanelli, J.R.1    Mark, L.2    Omotosho, P.A.3
  • 15
    • 54549118332 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases
    • Rao PP, Bhagwat SM, Rane A. The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases. HPB (Oxford) 2008; 10: 336-340.
    • (2008) HPB (Oxford) , vol.10 , pp. 336-340
    • Rao, P.P.1    Bhagwat, S.M.2    Rane, A.3
  • 16
    • 69849106209 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients
    • discussion 685-686.
    • Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS. Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am. Surg. 2009; 75: 681-685; discussion 685-686.
    • (2009) Am. Surg. , vol.75 , pp. 681-685
    • Hernandez, J.M.1    Morton, C.A.2    Ross, S.3    Albrink, M.4    Rosemurgy, A.S.5
  • 17
    • 57349084821 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology
    • Box G, Averch T, Cadeddu J etal. Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology. J. Endourol. 2008; 22: 2575-2581.
    • (2008) J. Endourol. , vol.22 , pp. 2575-2581
    • Box, G.1    Averch, T.2    Cadeddu, J.3
  • 18
    • 80052146222 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    • Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, Yih PC, Chan OC, Li MK. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 2011; 202: 254-258.
    • (2011) Am. J. Surg. , vol.202 , pp. 254-258
    • Lai, E.C.1    Yang, G.P.2    Tang, C.N.3    Yih, P.C.4    Chan, O.C.5    Li, M.K.6
  • 19
    • 79960178578 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial
    • Lirici MM, Califano AD, Angelini P, Corcione F. Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial. Am. J. Surg. 2011; 202: 45-52.
    • (2011) Am. J. Surg. , vol.202 , pp. 45-52
    • Lirici, M.M.1    Califano, A.D.2    Angelini, P.3    Corcione, F.4
  • 20
    • 79952135830 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data
    • discussion 372-363.
    • Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K etal. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am. J. Surg. 2011; 201: 369-372; discussion 372-363.
    • (2011) Am. J. Surg. , vol.201 , pp. 369-372
    • Marks, J.1    Tacchino, R.2    Roberts, K.3
  • 21
    • 79952485871 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study
    • Aprea G, Coppola Bottazzi E, Guida F, Masone S, Persico G. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. J. Surg. Res. 2011; 166: e109-112.
    • (2011) J. Surg. Res. , vol.166
    • Aprea, G.1    Coppola Bottazzi, E.2    Guida, F.3    Masone, S.4    Persico, G.5
  • 22
    • 0029914622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
    • Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D etal. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control. Clin. Trials 1996; 17: 1-12.
    • (1996) Control. Clin. Trials , vol.17 , pp. 1-12
    • Jadad, A.R.1    Moore, R.A.2    Carroll, D.3
  • 23
    • 0032558314 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
    • Moher D, Pham B, Jones A etal. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998; 352: 609-613.
    • (1998) Lancet , vol.352 , pp. 609-613
    • Moher, D.1    Pham, B.2    Jones, A.3
  • 24
    • 70350128808 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard
    • Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2009; 209: 632-637.
    • (2009) J. Am. Coll. Surg. , vol.209 , pp. 632-637
    • Philipp, S.R.1    Miedema, B.W.2    Thaler, K.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.