An informatics approach to medication adherence assessment and improvement using clinical, billing, and patient-entered data

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 517-521

  Dixon, Brian E ^a,b,c   Jabour, Abdulrahman M ^a   Phillips, Erin O'Kelly ^d   Marrero, David G ^d  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

^b REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETES CONTROL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT STUDY; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT CARE;

DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84901822612     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001959     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes report card 2012. In: US Department of Health and Human Services, ed. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012:1-4. http://www.cdc.gov/Diabetes//pubs/reportcard.htm.
2. Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, et al. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Population Health Metrics 2010;8:29.
3. Dall T, Nikolov P, Hogan P. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care 2003;26:917-32.
4. George B, Cebioglu M, Yeghiazaryan K. Inadequate diabetic care: global figures cry for preventive measures and personalized treatment. EPMA J 2010;1:13-18.
5. Kim C, Williamson DF, Herman WH, et al. Referral management and the care of patients with diabetes: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Am J Manag Care 2004;10(2 Pt 2):137.
6. Kim C, Williamson DF, Mangione CM, et al. Managed Care Organization and the Quality of Diabetes Care The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1529-34.
7. Levit K, Smith C, Cowan C, et al. Trends in US health care spending, 2001. Health Aff 2003;22:154-64.
8. Kerr EA, Gerzoff RB, Krein SL, et al. Diabetes care quality in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System and commercial managed care: the TRIAD study. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:272-81.
9. Mangione CM, Gerzoff RB, Williamson DF, et al. The association between quality of care and the intensity of diabetes disease management programs. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:107-16.
10. Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Ruby CM, et al. Suboptimal prescribing in older inpatients and outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:200-9.
11. Vik SA, Maxwell CJ, Hogan DB. Measurement, correlates, and health outcomes of medication adherence among seniors. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:303-12.
12. Benson J, Britten N. Patients' decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study. BMJ 2002;325:873.
13. Cramer JA. Microelectronic systems for monitoring and enhancing patient compliance with medication regimens. Drugs 1995;49:321-7.
14. Cramer JA. Enhancing patient compliance in the elderly. Drugs Aging 1998;12:7-15.
15. Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1218-24.
16. Farmer KC. Methods for measuring and monitoring medication regimen adherence in clinical trials and clinical practice. Clin Ther 1999;21:1074-90.
17. Shalansky SJ, Levy AR. Effect of number of medications on cardiovascular therapy adherence. Ann Pharmacother 2002;36:1532-9.
18. Grant RW, Devita NG, Singer DE, et al. Polypharmacy and medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1408-12.
19. Mann DM, Ponieman D, Leventhal H, et al. Predictors of adherence to diabetes medications: the role of disease and medication beliefs. J Behav Med 2009;32:278-84.
20. Brown MT, Bussell JK. Medication adherence: WHO cares? Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86:304-14.
21. Dixon BE, Zafar A, Overhage JM. A framework for evaluating the costs, effort, and value of nationwide health information exchange. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:295-301.
22. Biondich PG, Grannis SJ. The Indiana network for patient care: an integrated clinical information system informed by over thirty years of experience. J Public Health Manag Pract 2004;10:S81-6.
23. Sikka R, Xia F, Aubert RE. Estimating medication persistency using administrative claims data-page. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:449-57.
24. Mamlin BW, Biondich PG, Wolfe BA, et al. Cooking up an open source EMR for developing countries: OpenMRS-a recipe for successful collaboration. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2006, American Medical Informatics Association, 2006: 529.
25. Wolfe BA, Mamlin BW, Biondich PG, et al. The OpenMRS system: collaborating toward an open source EMR for developing countries. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2006, American Medical Informatics Association, 2006:1146.
26. Monahan PO, Lane KA, Hayes RP, et al. Reliability and validity of an instrument for assessing patients' perceptions about medications for diabetes: the PAM-D. Qual Life Res 2009;18:941-52.
27. Marrero D, Monahan P, Lane K, et al. Validation of a scale to measure patient-perceived barriers to medication use. 2006 International Society for Quality of Life Research meeting abstracts. Qual Life Res 2006;15(Suppl 1):A34-35, Abstract #1223.
28. Biondich PG, Dixon BE, Duke J, et al. Regenstrief medical informatics: experiences with clinical decision support systems. In: Greenes RA. ed. Clinical decision support: the road to broad adoption. 2nd edn. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, Inc, 2014; In press.
29. Zayas-Caban T, Dixon BE. Considerations for the design of safe and effective consumer health IT applications in the home. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19(Suppl 3):i61-7.
30. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care-an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:542-9.
31. Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, et al. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20(e1):e2-8.
32. Campbell EM, Guappone KP, Sittig DF, et al. Computerized provider order entry adoption: implications for clinical workflow. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:21-6.
33. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 2004;33:14-26.
34. Creswell J, Klassen A, Plano Clark V, et al. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: Office of Behavioral & Social Sciences Research, 2011.
35. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:121-6.
36. Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, et al. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:568-74.
37. Zhang WQ, Creswell J. The use of "mixing" procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Med Care 2013;51:e51-7.
38. Ownby RL. Development of an interactive tailored information application to improve patient medication adherence. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2005, American Medical Informatics Association, 2005:1069.
39. Jha AK, Burke MF, DesRoches C, et al. Progress toward meaningful use: hospitals' adoption of electronic health records. Am J Manag 2011;17(12 Spec No.): SP117-24.
40. Patel V, Jamoom E, Hsiao CJ, et al. Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:957-64.
41. Dixon BE, Simonaitis L, Goldberg HS, et al. A pilot study of distributed knowledge management and clinical decision support in the cloud. Artif Intell Med 2013;59:45-53.
42. Vollmer WM, Feldstein A, Smith DH, et al. Use of health information technology to improve medication adherence. Am J Manag Care 2011;17:SP79-87.
43. Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Hoerbst A. The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e162.
44. Grant RW, Wald JS, Schnipper JL, et al. Practice-linked online personal health records for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1776.