Formalisation of the level of detail in 3D city modelling

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 48, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-15

  Biljecki, Filip ^a   Ledoux, Hugo ^a   Stoter, Jantien ^a,b,c   Zhao, Junqiao ^a,d  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Kadaster   (Netherlands)

^c Geonovum   (Netherlands)

^d TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

3D city modelling; ADE; CityGML; Level of detail; Scale

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY;

ADE; CITYGML; CONTINUOUS LEVELS; DOMAIN EXTENSIONS; FORMALISATION; LEVEL OF DETAIL; OGC STANDARDS; SCALE;

SPECIFICATIONS;

GIS; PLANNING METHOD; PLANNING SYSTEM; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 84901808560     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adelaide City Council (2009). Development information guide of the Adelaide 3D City Model: Frequently asked questions for architects, designers and developers.
2. Albert, J., Bachmann, M., & Hellmeier, A. (2003). Zielgruppen und Anwendungen für Digitale Stadtmodelle und Digitale Geländemodell. Erhebungen im Rahmen der Arbeitsgruppe, Anwendungen und Zielgruppen" der SIG3D im Rahmen der Initiative GDI-NRW. Technical report SIG3D.
3. Bandrova, T., & Bonchev, S. (2013). 3D maps - scale, accuracy, level of detail. In Proceedings of the 26th international cartographic conference (p. 16). Dresden, Germany.
4. Benner, J., Geiger, A., Gröger, G., Häfele, K. -H., & Löwner, M. -O. (2013). Enhanced LOD concepts for virtual 3D city models. In U. Isikdag (Ed.), ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Proceedings of the ISPRS 8th 3D GeoInfo conference & WG II/2 workshop (pp. 51-61). Istanbul, Turkey.
5. Biljecki, F., Zhao, J., Stoter, J., & Ledoux, H. (2013). Revisiting the concept of level of detail in 3D city modelling. In U. Isikdag (Ed.), ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Proceedings of the ISPRS 8th 3D GeoInfo conference & WG II/2 workshop (pp. 63-74). Istanbul, Turkey.
6. Blom ASA (2011). Blom3D™ Whitepaper for Blom partners, clients and developers. Technical report 1.0 BLOM ASA Oslo, Norway.
7. Boeters, R. (2013). Automatic enhancement of CityGML LoD2 models with interiors and its usability for net internal area determination. Master's thesis, Section GIS Technology, Delft University of Technology.
8. van den Brink, L., Stoter, J., & Zlatanova, S. (2012). Modeling an application domain extension of CityGML in UML. In J. Pouliot, S. Daniel, F. Hubert, & A. Zamyadi (Eds.), International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Proceedings of the 7th international 3D GeoInfo conference (pp. 11-14). Québec, Canada.
9. van den Brink L., Stoter J., Zlatanova S. UML-based approach to developing a CityGML application domain extension. Transactions in GIS 2013, 17:920-942.
10. Çaǧdaş V. An application domain extension to CityGML for immovable property taxation: A Turkish case study. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2013, 21:545-555.
11. Chen, M. (2013). Comparison of 3D tree parameters. Master's thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
12. Chinese Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (2010). Technical specification for three dimensional city modeling. PRC Industry Standard 82765. China Building Industry Press.
13. City of Perth (2013). Planning and development application. 3D model specification.
14. City of Wollongong (2010). City Centre 3D model specifications.
15. Çöltekin A., Reichenbacher T. High quality geographic services and bandwidth limitations. Future Internet 2011, 3:379-396.
16. Coors, V. (2001). 3D-GIS in networking environments. In Proceedings of the international workshop on 3D cadastres. Registration of properties in strata (pp. 159-168). Delft, the Netherlands.
17. Coors V. 3D-GIS in networking environments. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2003, 27:345-357.
18. CyberCity 3D (2013). 3D modeling.
19. Döllner, J., & Buchholz, H. (2005). Continuous level-of-detail modeling of buildings in 3D city models. In C. Shahabi, & O. Boucelma (Eds.), GIS '05 Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems (pp. 173-181). Bremen, Germany.
20. Fan H., Meng L. A three-step approach of simplifying 3D buildings modeled by CityGML. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2012, 26:1091-1107.
21. Forberg A. Generalization of 3D building data based on a scale-space approach. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2007, 62:104-111.
22. Glander, T., & Döllner, J. (2008). Automated cell based generalization of virtual 3D city models with dynamic landmark highlighting. In Proceedings of the 11th ICA workshop on generalization and multiple representation (pp. 1-14). Montpellier, France.
23. Glander T., Döllner J. Abstract representations for interactive visualization of virtual 3D city models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2009, 33:375-387.
24. Glasgow City Council (2009). Urban model specification. Glasgow City Council. Development and Regeneration Services.
25. Goetz M. Towards generating highly detailed 3D CityGML models from OpenStreetMap. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2013, 27:845-865.
26. Gröger, G., Benner, J., Dörschlag, D., Drees, R., Gruber, U., Leinemann, K., et al. (2005). Das interoperable 3D-Stadtmodell der SIG 3D. Zeitschrift für Geodäsie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement, 130, 343-353.
27. Gröger, G., Kolbe, T. H., Drees, R., Kohlhaas, A., Müller, H., Knospe, F., et al. (2004). Das interoperable 3D-Stadtmodell der SIG 3D der GDI NRW. Technical report initiative Geodaten Infrastruktur NRW.
28. Gröger G., Plümer L. CityGML - Interoperable semantic 3D city models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2012, 71:12-33.
29. Hagedorn, B., Trapp, M., Glander, T., & Döllner, J. (2009). Towards an indoor level-of-detail model for route visualization. In 10th International conference on mobile data management: Systems, services and middleware (pp. 692-697). Taipei, Taiwan: IEEE.
30. Hochtief ViCon (2011). Lusail City. 3D model specifications high rise buildings. Technical report Hochtief ViCon Lusail City, Qatar.
31. ISO (2004). ISO 6707-1:2004(E): Building and civil engineering - Vocabulary. International Organisation for Standardisation (TC 59/SC 2).
32. ISO (2013). ISO 19157:2013 - Geographic information - Data quality. International Organisation for Standardisation (TC 211).
33. Kada M. Scale-dependent simplification of 3D building models based on cell decomposition and primitive instancing. Lecture notes in computer science. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on spatial information theory (COSIT 2007) 2007, 222-237. Springer, Melbourne, Australia.
34. Kemec, S., Zlatanova, S., & Duzgun, S. (2012). A new LoD definition hierarchy for 3D city models used for natural disaster risk communication tool. In T. Bandrova, C. König, & G. Zhelezov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international conference on cartography and GIS (pp. 95-104). Albena, Bulgaria.
35. Kolbe T.H., Gröger G., Plümer L. CityGML: Interoperable access to 3D city models. Geo-information for disaster management. Proceedings of the first international symposium on geo-information for disaster management - GI4DM 2005, 883-899. Springer verlag, Delft, the Netherlands. P. van Oosterom, S. Zlatanova, E. Fendel (Eds.).
36. Kolbe, T. H., Nagel, C., & Stadler, A. (2009). CityGML-OGC standard for photogrammetry. In D. Fritsch (Ed.), Proceedings of the 52nd photogrammetric week '09 (pp. 265-277). Stuttgart, Germany.
37. Lemmens M. Quality of geo-information. Technologies applications and the environment 2011, 211-227. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
38. Li, K. -J., & Lee, J. (2010). Indoor spatial awareness initiative and standard for indoor spatial data. In Proceedings of the IROS 2010 workshop on standardization for service robots: Current status and future directions (p. 5). Taipei, Taiwan.
39. Löwner, M. -O., Benner, J., Gröger, G., & Häfele, K. -H. (2013). New concepts for structuring 3D city models - An extended level of detail concept for CityGML buildings. In B. Murgante, S. Misra, M. Carlini, C. M. Torre, H. -Q. Nguyen, D. Taniar, et al. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science. Proceedings of the 13th international conference computational science and its applications - ICCSA 2013 (pp. 466-480). Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
40. Luebke D., Reddy M., Cohen J.D., Varshney A., Watson B., Huebner R. Level of detail for 3D graphics 2003, Morgan Kaufman.
41. Machl, T. (2013). Minutes of the international OGC, SIG 3D and TUM workshop on requirements for CityGML 3.0. In International OGC, SIG 3D and TUM workshop on requirements for CityGML 3.0 (pp. 1-28). Munich, Germany: Technische Universität Munchen.
42. Mandelbrot B. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science 1967, 156:636-638.
43. Mao, B. (2011). Visualisation and generalisation of 3D city models. Ph.D. thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
44. Meng L., Forberg A. 3D building generalisation. Challenges in the portrayal of geographic information: Issues of generalisation and multi scale representation 2007, 211-232. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. W. Mackaness, A. Ruas, T. Sarjakoski (Eds.).
45. Morton, P. J., Horne, M., Dalton, R. C., & Thompson, E. M. (2012). Virtual city models: Avoidance of obsolescence. In H. Achten, J. Pavlicek, J. Hulin, & J. Matejdan (Eds.), Digital physicality - Proceedings of the 30th eCAADe conference (pp. 213-224). Prague, Czech Republic.
46. NAVTEQ (2011). 3D landmarks - A product guide for developers.
47. Novaković I. 3D model of Zagreb. GIM International 2011, 25:25-29.
48. van Oosterom, P., & Stoter, J. (2010). 5D data modelling: Full integration of 2D/3D space, time and scale dimensions. In S. I. Fabrikant, T. Reichenbacher, M. van Kreveld, & M. Schlieder (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference GIScience 2010 (pp. 311-324). Zürich, Switzerland.
49. Open Geospatial Consortium (2012). OGC city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard.
50. Oude Elberink S., Vosselman G. Quality analysis on 3D building models reconstructed from airborne laser scanning data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2011, 66:157-165.
51. Rafiee, A., Dias, E., & Koomen, E. (2013). Between green and grey: Towards a new green volume indicator for cities. In S. Geertman, J. Stillwell, & F. Toppen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on computers in urban planning and urban management (CUPUM) (pp. 1-18). Utrecht, the Netherlands.
52. Rossignac J. Shape complexity. The Visual Computer 2005, 21:985-996.
53. Sanborn (2013). 3D cities™. Sanborn.
54. Schilcher, M., Roschlaub, R., & Guo, Z. (1998). Vom 2D-GIS zum 3D-Stadtmodell durch Kombination von GIS-, CAD- und Animationstechniken. In Tagungsband ACS '98, Fachseminar Geoinformationssysteme (p. 12). Frankfurt, Germany.
55. Sester, M. (2007). 3D visualization and generalization. In D. Fritsch (Ed.), Proceedings of the 51st photogrammetric week '07 (pp. 285-295). Stuttgart, Germany.
56. Stadler, A., & Kolbe, T. H. (2007). Spatio-semantic coherence in the integration of 3D city models. In A. Stein (Ed.), International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Proceedings of the WG II/7 5th international symposium spatial data quality 2007 with the theme: Modelling qualities in space and time (p. 8). Enschede, the Netherlands.
57. Sternberg H., Keller F., Willemsen T. Precise indoor mapping as a basis for coarse indoor navigation. Journal of Applied Geodesy 2013, 7:231-246.
58. Stoter, J., Ledoux, H., Meijers, M., Arroyo Ohori, K., & van Oosterom, P. (2012). 5D modeling - Applications and advantages. In Geospatial world forum (p. 9). Amsterdam.
59. Stoter J., Ledoux H., Reuvers M., van den Brink L., Klooster R., Janssen P., et al. Establishing and implementing a national 3D standard in the Netherlands. Photogrammetrie - Fernerkundung - Geoinformation 2013, 2013:381-392.
60. Tamminga, G., van den Brink, L., van Lint, H., Stoter, J., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2013). Towards GIS compliant data structures for traffic and transportation models. In Transportation research board 92nd annual meeting 2013. Transportation data interoperability: Recent research (Session 283) (p. 18). Washington, DC, USA.
61. Tempfli, K., & Pilouk, M. (1996). Practicable photogrammetry for 3D-GIS. In K. Kraus, & P. Waldhäusl (Eds.), International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Proceedings of the XVIIIrd ISPRS congress. Technical commission IV (pp. 859-867). Vienna, Austria.
62. Thiemann, F. (2003). 3D-Gebäude-Generalisierung. In W. G. Koch (Ed.), Theorie 2003 - Vorträge der Dresdner Sommerschule für Kartographie (pp. 52-61). Dresden, Germany.
63. Vande Velde, L. (2005). Tele atlas 3D navigable maps. In G. Gröger, & T. H. Kolbe (Eds.), EuroSDR international workshop on next generation 3D city models (pp. 47-50).
64. Vertex Modelling (2013). Wide area models.