Revisiting the concept of level of detail in 3D city modelling

ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 2W1, 2013, Pages 63-74

  Biljecki, F ^a   Zhao, J ^a,b   Stoter, J ^a,c,d   Ledoux, H ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Kadaster   (Netherlands)

^d Geonovum   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D City Modelling; Level of Detail; Scale

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901762529     PISSN: 21949042     EISSN: 21949050     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-II-2-W1-63-2013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. TM Whitepaper for Blom partners, clients and developers. Technical Report 1.0, BLOM ASA, Oslo, Norway.
2. Clark, J. H., 1976. Hierarchical geometric models for visible surface algorithms. Communications of the ACM 19(10), pp. 547-554.
3. Çöltekin, A. and Reichenbacher, T., 2011. High Quality Geographic Services and Bandwidth Limitations. Future Internet 3(4), pp. 379-396.
4. Döllner, J. and Buchholz, H., 2005. Continuous level-of-detail modeling of buildings in 3D city models. In: GIS'05: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems, ACM Request Permissions, Bremen, Germany, pp. 173-181.
5. Erikson, C., Manocha, D. and Baxter, III, W. V., 2001. HLODs for faster display of large static and dynamic environments. In: J. F. Hughes and C. H. Séquin (eds), Proceedings of the 2001 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics (I3D), ACM Press, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, pp. 111-120.
6. Fan, H. and Meng, L., 2012. A three-step approach of simplifying 3D buildings modeled by CityGML. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26(6), pp. 1091-1107.
7. Fan, H., Mao, B., Shen, J. and Meng, L., 2011. Shell model representation as a substitute of LoD3 for 3D modeling in CityGML. Geo-spatial Information Science 14(2), pp. 79-84.
8. Franić, S., Bačić-Deprato, I. and Novaković, I., 2009. 3D model and a scale model of the City of Zagreb. In: L. Harrie (ed.), ISPRS WG II/2, II/3, II/4 Workshop on quality, scale and analysis aspects of city models, Lund, Sweden, pp. 1-7.
9. Häfele, K.-H., 2011. CityGML Model of the FJK-Haus. Institut für Angewandte Informatik (IAI), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie.
10. Kolbe, T. H., n.d. What is CityGML?
11. Lemmens, M., 2011. Quality of Geo-information. In: Geo-information. Technologies, Applications and the Environment., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 211-227.
12. Luebke, D., Reddy, M., Cohen, J. D., Varshney, A., Watson, B. and Hueb-ner, R., 2003. Level of detail for 3D graphics. Morgan Kaufmann Pub.
13. Meng, L. and Forberg, A., 2007. 3D building generalisation. In: W. Mackaness, A. Ruas and T. Sarjakoski (eds), Challenges in the portrayal of geographic information: Issues of Generalisation and Multi Scale Representation, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 211-232.
14. Nagel, C., 2011. Private correspondence with Claus Nagel, the editor of CityGML specifications.
15. NAVTEQ, 2011. 3D Landmarks - A product guide for developers. NAVTEQ.
16. Novaković, I., 2011. 3D Model of Zagreb. GIM International 25(1), pp. 25-29.
17. Open Geospatial Consortium, 2012. OGC City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) Encoding Standard.
18. Spearman, C., 1904. The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American journal of psychology 15(1), pp. 72-101.
19. Stadler, A. and Kolbe, T. H., 2007. Spatio-semantic coherence in the integration of 3D city models. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality, Enschede, the Netherlands, pp. 1-8.
20. Stoter, J., Ledoux, H., Meijers, M. and Arroyo Ohori, K., 2012. Integrating Scale and Space in 3D City Models. In: Proceedings of the 7th International 3D GeoInfo Conference. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Québec, Canada, pp. 7-10.
21. Tamminga, G., van den Brink, L., van Lint, H., Stoter, J. and Hoogen-doorn, S., 2013. Towards GIS compliant data structures for traffic and transportation models. In: Transportation Data Interoperability: Recent Research (Session 283), Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting 2013, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 1-18.
22. van Oosterom, P. and Meijers, M., 2011. Towards a true vario-scale structure supporting smooth-zoom. Proceedings of 14th Workshop of the ICA commission on Generalisation and Multiple Representation & the ISPRS Commission II/2 Working Group on Multiscale Representation of Spatial Data pp. 1-19.
23. van Oosterom, P. and Stoter, J., 2010. 5D Data Modelling: Full Integration of 2D/3D Space, Time and Scale Dimensions. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2010), Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Zürich, Switzerland, pp. 311-324.