Hybrid choice models: The identification problem

Handbook of Choice Modelling

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 519-564

  Vij, Akshay ^a   Walker, Joan L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925165525     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781003152.00031     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Bastin, F. and C. Cirillo (2010), ‘Reducing simulation bias in mixed logit model estimation’, Journal of Choice Modelling, 3 (2), 71–88.
2. Ben-Akiva, M. and S. Lerman (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Ben-Akiva, M., J.L. Walker, A.T. Bernardino, D.A. Gopinath, T. Morikawa and A. Polydoropoulou (2002), ‘Integration of choice and latent variable models’, in S. Hani Mahmassani (ed.), In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 431–70.
4. Bolduc, D. (1999), ‘A practical technique to estimation of multinomial probit models in transportation’, Transportation Research B: Methodological, 33 (1), pp. 63–79.
5. Bollen, K.A. (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
6. Bunch, D.A. (1991), ‘Estimability in the multinomial probit model’, Transportation Research B, 25 (1), 1–12.
7. Campbell, D. and S. Hess (2009), ‘Outlying sensitivities in discrete choice data: cause, consequences and remedies’, paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Amsterdam, 5–7 October.
8. Carrasco, J.A. and J. de D. Ortúzar (2002), ‘Review and assessment of the nested logit model’, Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 22 (2), 197–218.
9. Chiou, L. and J.L. Walker (2007), ‘Masking identification of discrete choice models under simulation methods’, Journal of Econometrics, 141 (2), 683–703.
10. Daziano, R.A. and D. Bolduc (2012), ‘Covariance, identification, and finite sample performance of the MSL and Bayes estimators of a logit model with latent variables’, Transportation, forthcoming.
11. Fisher, F.M. (1976), The Identification Problem in Econometrics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Gaker, D., D. Vautin, A. Vij and J.L. Walker (2011), ‘The power and value of green in promoting sustainable transport behavior’, Environmental Research Letters, 6 (6), 034010.
13. Grubbs, F.E. (1969), ‘Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples’, Technometrics, 11 (1), 1–21.
14. Hannemann, R.A. (2000), ‘Structural equation models: identification issues’, Sociology 203B, accessed 1 July 2012 at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/soc203b/lectures/identify.html.
15. Hayduk, L.A. (1988), Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Hensher, D. and W.H. Greene (2003), ‘The mixed logit model: the state of practice’, Transportation, 30 (2), 133–76.
17. Kenny, D.A. (1979), Correlation and Causality, New York: Wiley.
18. McFadden, D. (1984), ‘Econometric analysis of qualitative response models’, in Z. Griliches and M.D. Intriligator (eds), Handbook of Econometrics II, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1395–457.
19. McFadden, D.L. (1986), ‘The choice theory approach to marketing research’, Marketing Science, 5 (4), 275–97.
20. McFadden, D. and K. Train (2000), ‘Mixed MNL models for discrete response’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15 (5), 447–70.
21. Muthén, L.K, and B. Muthén (2002), ‘How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power’, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9 (4), 599–620.
22. O’Brien, R.M. (1994), ‘Identification of simple measurement models with multiple latent variables and correlated errors’, Sociological Methodology, 24, 137–70
23. Raveau, S., M.F. Yáñez and J. de D. Ortúzar (2012), ‘Practical and empirical identifiability of hybrid discrete choice models’, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46 (10), 1374–83.
24. Reilly, T. (1995), ‘A necessary and sufficient condition for identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of factor complexity one’, Sociological Methods and Research, 23 (4), 421–41.
25. Reilly, T. and R.M. O’Brien (1996), ‘Identification of confirmatory factor analysis model of arbitrary complexity: the side-by-side rule’, Sociological Methods and Research, 24 (4), 473–91.
26. Temme, D., M. Paulssen and T. Dannewald (2008), ‘Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models – a simultaneous estimation approach using SEM software’, BuR – Business Research, 1 (2), 220–37.
27. Train, K. E. (2009), ‘Discrete choice models with simulation’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Tudela, A., K.M.N. Habib, J.A. Carrasco and A.O. Osman (2011), ‘Incorporating the explicit role of psychological factors on mode choice: a hybrid mode choice model by using data from an innovative psychometric survey’, paper presented at the Second International Choice Modeling Conference, Leeds, July.
29. Walker, J.L. (2001), ‘Extended discrete choice models: integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables’, PhD dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
30. Walker, J. and M. Ben-Akiva (2002), ‘Generalized random utility model’, Mathematical Social Sciences, 43 (3), 303–43.
31. Walker, J. L., M. Ben-Akiva and D. Bolduc (2007), ‘Identification of parameters in normal error component logit-mixture (NECLM) models’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22 (6), 1095–125.
32. Zhao, J. (2009), ‘Preference accommodating and preference shaping: incorporating traveler preferences into transportation planning’, PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.