From Movement Data to Objects Behavior Using Semantic Trajectory and Semantic Events

Marine Geodesy

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 126-144

  Vandecasteele, Arnaud ^a   Devillers, Rodolphe ^a   Napoli, Aldo ^b  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

maritime domain; mobile object; semantic event; Spatial ontology; trajectory analysis

Indexed keywords

DATA MANAGEMENT; DATA PROCESSING; TRAJECTORY; VESSEL;

EID: 84901707377     PISSN: 01490419     EISSN: 1521060X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2014.902885     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andrienko, N., and G. Andrienko, 2007. Designing visual analytics methods for massive collections of movement data. Cartographica 42(2):117-138.
2. Andrienko, G., N. Andrienko, C. Hurter, S. Rinzivillo, and S. Wrobel, 2011. From movement tracks through events to places: Extracting and characterizing significant places from mobility data. In Proceedings of IEEE Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST 2011), Providence, RI, USA, 161-170. IEEE Computer Society Press.
3. Andrienko, G., N. Andrienko, G. Fuchs, A.M. Olteanu Raimond, J. Symanzik, and C. Ziemlicki, 2013. Extracting semantics of individual places from movement data by analyzing temporal patterns of visits. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Computational Models of Place, Orlando, FL, USA, 5-8.
4. Arenas, M., M. Consens, and A. Mallea, 2010. Revisiting blank nodes in RDF to avoid the semantic mismatch with SPARQL. W3C Workshop: RDF Next Steps, Palo Alto, CA.
5. Baglioni, M., J.A. Fernandes de Macêdo, C. Renso, R. Trasarti, and M. Wachowicz, 2009. Towards semantic interpretation of movement behavior. In Advances in GIScience, ed. M. Sester, L. Bernard, and V. Paelke, 271-288. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
6. Baud, O., Y. El-Bied, N. Honoré, and O. Taupin, 2007. Trajectory comparison for civil aircraft. Aerospace Conference, IEEE,. Big Sky, MT, USA, 1-9.
7. Bogorny, V., C. Renso, A.R. de Aquino, F. de Lucca Siqueira, and L.O. Alvares, 2013. CONSTAnT - a conceptual data model for semantic trajectories of moving objects. Transactions in GIS 18(1):66-88.
8. Claus, S., N. De Hauwere, B. Vanhoorne, P. Deckers, F. Hernandez, and J. Mees, 2014. Marine regions: Towards a global standard for georeferenced marine names and boundaries. Marine Geodesy,. this issue.
9. Dia Miron, A. 2009. Découverte d'associations sémantiques pour le Web sémantique géospatial - Le framework ONTOAST. Doctoral dissertation, Université Joseph-Fourier - Grenoble I, France.
10. Dodge, S., R. Weibel, and A.-K. Lautenschütz, 2008. Towards a taxonomy of movement patterns. Information Visualization 7(3-4):240-252.
11. Doerr, M. 2003. The CIDOC conceptual reference module: An ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine 24(3):75-92.
12. Douglas, D.H., and T.K. Peucker, 1973. Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature. Cartographica 10(2):112-122.
13. Enguehard, R.A., O. Hoeber, and R. Devillers, 2012. Interactive exploration of movement data: A case study of geovisual analytics for fishing vessel analysis. Information Visualization 12(1):85-101.
14. Etienne, L., T. Devogele, and A. Bouju, 2012. Spatio-temporal trajectory analysis of mobile objects following the same itinerary. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling,. Hong Kong, 45-57, Shi, W., M. Goodchild, B. Lees, Y. Leung (eds.), London: CRC Press and Taylor and Francis Group.
15. Faye, D., O. Cure, and G. Blin, 2012. A survey of RDF storage approaches. ARIMA Journal 15:11-35.
16. Gatalsky, P., N. Andrienko, and G. Andrienko, 2004. Interactive analysis of event data using space-time cube. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, 145-152. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
17. Grenon, P., and B. Smith, 2004. SNAP and SPAN: Towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spatial Cognition & Computation 4(1):69-104.
18. Gruber, T.R. 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2):199-220.
19. Grüninger, M., and J. Lee, 2002. Ontology applications and design - introduction. ACM 45(2):39-41.
20. Guarino, N. 2009. The ontological level: Revisiting 30 years of knowledge representation. In Conceptual modeling: Foundations and applications, eds. A.T. Borgida, V.K. Chaudhri, P. Giorgini, and E.S. Yu, 5600: 52-67. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
21. van Hage, W.R., and D. Ceolin, 2013. The simple event model. In Situation awareness with systems of systems, 149-169. New York: Springer.
22. van Hage, W.R., V. Malaisé, R. Segers, L. Hollink, and G. Schreiber, 2011. Design and use of the simple event model (SEM). Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 9(2):128-136.
23. van Hage, W.R., V. Malaisé, G. de Vries, G. Schreiber, and M. van Someren, 2009. Combining ship trajectories and semantics with the simple event model (SEM). In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Events in Multimedia (EiMM'09), Beijing, 73-80. Beijing: Sheridan Publishers.
24. Holst, A., B. Bjurling, J. Ekman, A. Rudstrom, K. Wallenius, M. Bjorkman, F. Fooladvandi, R. Laxhammar, and J. Tronninger, 2012. A joint statistical and symbolic anomaly detection system: Increasing performance in maritime surveillance. In 15th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), Singapore, 1919-1926.
25. Horrocks, I., P. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean, 2004. SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Submission.
26. Kalman, R.E. 1960. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transactions of the ASME - Journal of Basic Engineering 82 (Series D):35-45.
27. Karmacharya, A., C. Cruz, F. Boochs, and F. Marzani, 2010. Use of geospatial analyses for semantic reasoning. In Knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems, Brest, France, 6276:576-586. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
28. Karmacharya, A., C. Cruz, F. Boochs, and F. Marzani, 2011. Integration of spatial processing and knowledge processing through the semantic web stack. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on GeoSpatial Semantics,. Seattle, WA, GeoS'11, 200-216. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
29. van Laere, J., and M. Nilsson, 2009. Evaluation of a workshop to capture knowledge from subject matter experts in maritime surveillance. In 12th International Conference on Information Fusion, 171-178. Seattle, WA: IEEE.
30. Laxhammar, R. 2008. Anomaly detection for sea surveillance. In 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, Cologne, Germany, 1-8.
31. Lee, W.-C., and J. Krumm, 2011. Trajectory preprocessing. In Computing with Spatial Trajectories, eds. Y. Zheng and X. Zhou, 3-33. New York: Springer.
32. th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA'10) - Volume Part II,. Tsukuba, Japan, 32-46. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
33. Lieberman, J., R. Singh, and C. Goad, 2007. W3C geospatial ontologies. W3C Incubator Group. http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo-ont-20071023/#ontologies. Accessed 25 April 2014.
34. Malki, J., R. Wannous, A. Bouju, and C. Vincent, 2012. Temporal reasoning in trajectories using an ontological modelling approach. Control and Cybernetics 41(4):1-16.
35. Mark, D. M., B. Smith, and B. Tversky, 1999. Ontology and geographic objects: An empirical study of cognitive categorization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science,. Stade, Germany, COSIT'99, 283-298. London: Springer-Verlag.
36. Martineau, E., and J. Roy, 2011. Maritime anomaly detection: Domain introduction and review of selected literature. Canada: Defense R&D Canada.
37. Meratnia, N., and R. de By, 2004. Spatiotemporal compression techniques for moving point objects. In Advances in Database Technology (EDBT 2004), 2992: 765-782. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
38. Nanni, M., R. Trasarti, C. Renso, F. Giannotti, and D. Pedreschi, 2010. Advanced knowledge discovery on movement data with the GeoPKDD system. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT'10),. Lausanne, Switzerland, 693-696. New York: ACM Computing Surveys.
39. Parent, C., S. Spaccapietra, C. Renso, G. Andrienko, N. Andrienko, V. Bogorny, M.L. Damiani, A. Gkoulalasdivanis, J. Macedo, N. Pelekis, Y. Theodoridis, Z. Yan, 2012. Semantic trajectories modeling and analysis. New York: ACM Computing Surveys.
40. Pelekis, N., Y. Theodoridis, S. Vosinakis, and T. Panayiotopoulos, 2006. Hermes-a framework for location-based data management. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advances in Database Technology,. Munich, Germany, 1130-1134. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
41. Raimond, Y., F. Giasson, K. Jacobson, G. Fazekas, T. Gängler, S. Reinhardt, and A. Passant, 2009. Music ontology specification. Specification Document.
42. Ray, C., F. Comblet, J.-M. Bonnin, Y.L. Roux, and F. Peyret, 2010. Wireless and information technologies Supporting intelligent location-based services. Wireless Technologies in Intelligent Transportation Systems, 9:225-265.
43. Ressler, J., M. Dean, and D. Kolas, 2010. Geospatial ontology trade study. In Ontologies and semantic technologies for intelligence, 213:179-211. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press.
44. Riveiro, M., and G. Falkman, 2009. Interactive visualization of normal behavioral models and expert rules for maritime anomaly detection. Sixth International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization,. Tianjin, Singapore, 459-466. Singapore: IEEE Computer Society.
45. Riveiro, M., G. Falkman, and T. Ziemke, 2008a. Improving maritime anomaly detection and situation awareness through interactive visualization. In 11th International Conference on Information Fusion,Cologne, Germany, 1-8.
46. Riveiro, M., G. Falkman, and T. Ziemke, 2008b. Visual analytics for the detection of anomalous maritime behavior. 12th International Conference on Information Visualisation,. London, 273-279. London: IEEE Computer Society.
47. Riveiro, M., G. Falkman, T. Ziemke, and T. Kronhamn, 2009. Reasoning about anomalies: A study of the analytical process of detecting and identifying anomalous behavior in maritime traffic data. In Proceedings of SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing,. Orlando, FL, USA, 1-12.
48. Schneider, M. 2009. Moving objects in databases and GIS: State-of-the-art and open problems. In Research Trends in Geographic Information Science, eds. G. Navratil, 169-187. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
49. Sirin, E., B. Parsia, B.C. Grau, A. Kalyanpur, and Y. Katz, 2007. Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Web Semant 5(2):51-53.
50. Spaccapietra, S., N. Cullot, C. Parent, and C. Vangenot, 2004. On spatial ontologies. 6th Brazilian Symposium on Geoinformatics, Campos do Jordao, Brazil.
51. Spaccapietra, S., C. Parent, M.L. Damiani, J.A. deMacedo, F. Porto, and C. Vangenot, 2008. A conceptual view on trajectories. Data & Knowledge Engineering 65(1):126-146.
52. Stocker, M., and E. Sirin, 2009. Pellet spatial: A hybrid RCC-8 and RDF/OWL reasoning and query engine. OWLED.
53. Studer, R., V.R. Benjamins, and D. Fensel, 1998. Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering 25(. 1-2):161-197. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
54. Taylor, G., C. Brunsdon, J. Li, A. Olden, D. Steup, and M. Winter, 2006. GPS accuracy estimation using map matching techniques: Applied to vehicle positioning and odometer calibration. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 30(6):757-772.
55. Vandecasteele, A. 2012. Modélisation ontologique des connaissances expertes pour l'analyse de comportements à risque: Application à la surveillance maritime. Thèse, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris.
56. Vandecasteele, A., and A. Napoli, 2012. Enhancement of ontology with spatial reasoning capabilities to support maritime anomaly detection. In Proceedings 7th International Conference on System of Systems, Genova, Italy. Engineering-IEEE SOSE.
57. Vandecasteele, A., and A. Napoli, 2013. Modélisation ontologique pour l'analyse de comportements de navires à risques. SAGEO 2013 Conference, Brest, France.
58. Vandecasteele, A., R. Devillers, and A. Napoli, 2013. A semi-supervised learning framework based on spatio-temporal semantic events for maritime anomaly detection and behavior analysis. CoastGIS 2013, Victoria, BC, Canada.
59. Wannous, R., J. Malki, A. Bouju, and C. Vincent, 2013. Modelling mobile object activities based on trajectory ontology rules considering spatial relationship rules. In Modeling approaches and algorithms for advanced computer applications, eds. A. Amine, O. Ait Mohamed, and L. Bellatreche, 488:249-258. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
60. Wolfson, O. 2002. Moving objects information management: The database challenge. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Next Generation Information Technologies and Systems. (NGITS'02),. Caesarea, Israel, 75-89. London: Springer-Verlag.
61. Yan, Z. 2011. Semantic trajectories: Computing and understanding mobility data. Doctoral dissertation, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse.
62. Yan, Z., D. Chakraborty, C. Parent, S. Spaccapietra, and K. Aberer, 2012. Semantic trajectories: Mobility data computation and annotation. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (4):1-34.
63. Yan, Z., J. Macedo, C. Parent, and S. Spaccapietra, 2008. Trajectory ontologies and queries. Transactions in GIS (12):75-91.
64. Zheni, D., A. Frihida, H.B. Ghezala, and C. Claramunt, 2009. A semantic approach for the modeling of trajectories in space and time. In Advances in Conceptual Modeling - Challenging Perspectives, eds. C.A. Heuser and G. Pernul, 347-356. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
65. Zhigang, M., Y. Yi, N. Sebe, Z. Kai, and A.G. Hauptmann, 2013. Multimedia event detection using a classifier-specific intermediate representation. IEEE Transactions 15(7):1628-1637.