Interactive exploration of movement data: A case study of geovisual analytics for fishing vessel analysis

Information Visualization

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 65-84

  Enguehard, René A ^a   Hoeber, Orland ^a   Devillers, Rodolphe ^a  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Field trials; Filtering; Fisheries; Fractal; Geovisual analytics; Geovisualization; Large datasets; Movement; Pattern extraction; Velocity; Vessel monitoring system

Indexed keywords

FIELD TRIAL; GEO VISUALIZATIONS; GEOVISUAL ANALYTICS; LARGE DATASETS; MOVEMENT; PATTERN EXTRACTION; VESSEL MONITORING SYSTEMS;

FILTRATION; FISHERIES; FISHING VESSELS; FRACTAL DIMENSION; FRACTALS; ITERATIVE METHODS;

VELOCITY;

EID: 84879365499     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473871612456121     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Andrienko G, Andrienko N and Wrobel S. Visual analytics tools for analysis of movement data. ACM SIGKDD - SIGKDD Explorations 2007; 9(2): 38-46.
2. Dykes JA and Mountain DA. Seeking structure in records of spatio-temporal behaviour: visualization issues, efforts and applications. Comput Stat Data An 2003; 43(4): 581-603.
3. Kraak M-J and Van De Vlag DE. Understanding spatiotemporal patterns: visual ordering of space and time. Cartographica 2007; 42(2): 153-161.
4. Eagle N and Pentland AS. Eigenbehaviors: identifying structure in routine. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2009; 63(7): 1057-1066.
5. Zhao J, Forer P and Harvey AS. Activities, ringmaps and geovisualization of large human movement fields. Inf Vis 2008; 7(3-4): 198-209.
6. Underwood AJ and Chapman MG. Multifactorial analyses of directions of movement of animals. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 1985; 91(1-2): 17-43.
7. Höferlin M, Höferlin B, Weiskopf D, et al. Uncertaintyaware video visual analytics of tracked moving objects. J Spat Inf Sci 2011; 2(2): 87-117.
8. Kwan M-P. Interactive geovisualization of activity - travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set. Transport Res C-Emer 2000; 8(1-6): 185-203.
9. Jern M and Franzen J. Integrating InfoVis and GeoVis components. In: IEEE international conference on information visualization, 2007 4-6 July; pp. 511-520. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
10. Shneiderman B. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of IEEE symposium on visual languages, 1996 September 3-6; pp. 336-343. Boulder, CO: IEEE.
11. Mandelbrot BB. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science 1967; 156(3775): 636-638.
12. Theiler J. Estimating fractal dimension. J Opt Soc Am A 1990; 7(6): 1055-1073.
13. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2003.
14. Rodighiero D. Guidelines to visualize vessels in a geographic information system. In: IEEE international conference on information visualization, 2010 July 26-29; pp. 455-459. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
15. Schaefer KM and Fuller DW. Comparative performance of current-generation geolocating archival tags. Mar Technol Soc J 2006; 40(1): 15-28.
16. Tufte ER. The visual display of quantitative information. 2nd ed. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 2001.
17. Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Dykes J, et al. Geovisualization of dynamics, movement and change: key issues and developing approaches in visualization research. Inf Vis 2008; 7(3-4): 173-180.
18. Hägerstrand T. What about people in regional science? Pap Reg Sci 1970; 24(1): 6-21.
19. Ren F and Kwan M-P. Geovisualization of human hybrid activity - travel patterns. Transactions in GIS 2007; 11(5): 721-744.
20. Kraak MJ. The space-time cube revisited from a geovisualization perspective. In: Proceedings of the 21st international cartographic conference, 2003 August 10-16; pp. 1988-1995. Durban, South Africa: International Cartographic Association.
21. Rinzivillo S, Pedreschi D, Nanni M, et al. Visually driven analysis of movement data by progressive clustering. Inf Vis 2008; 7(3-4): 225-239.
22. Willems N, Van DeWetering H and Van Wijk JJ. Visualization of vessel movements. Comput Graph Forum 2009; 28(3): 959-966.
23. Andrienko N, Andrienko G, Pelekis N, et al. Basic concepts of movement data. In: Giannotti F and Pedreschi D (eds) Mobility data mining and privacy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 15-38.
24. Dodge S, Weibel R and Lautenschütz A-K. Towards a taxonomy of movement patterns. Inf Vis 2008; 7(3-4): 240-252.
25. Andersson M, Gudmundsson J, Laube P, et al. Reporting leaders and followers among trajectories of moving point objects. GeoInformatica 2008; 12(4): 497-528.
26. Gottfried B. Interpreting motion events of pairs of moving objects. GeoInformatica 2011; 15(2): 247-271.
27. Pelot R and Wu Y. Classification of recreational boat types based on trajectory patterns. Pattern Recogn Lett 2007; 28(15): 1987-1994.
28. Laxhammar R, Falkman G and Sviestins E. Anomaly detection in sea traffic: a comparison of the Gaussian mixture model and the Kernel density estimator. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on information fusion, 2009 July 6-9; pp. 756-763. Seattle, WA: IEEE.
29. Gurarie E, Andrews RD and Laidre KL. A novel method for identifying behavioural changes in animal movement data. Ecol Lett 2009; 12(5): 395-408.
30. Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Hurter C, et al. From movement tracks through events to places: extracting and characterizing significant places from mobility data. In: IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology, 2011 October 23-28; pp. 159-168. Providence, RI, USA: IEEE.
31. Franke A, Caelli T and Hudson RJ. Analysis of movements and behavior of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) using hidden Markov models. Ecol Model 2004; 173(2-3): 259-270.
32. Focardi S, Marcellini P and Montanaro P. Do ungulates exhibit a food density threshold? A field study of optimal foraging and movement patterns. J Anim Ecol 1996; 65(5): 606-620.
33. Bartumeus F and Catalan J. Optimal search behavior and classic foraging theory. J Phys A-Math Theor 2009; 42(43): 12 pp.
34. Charnov EL. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 1976; 9(2): 129-136.
35. Marell A, Ball JP and Hofgaard A. Foraging and movement paths of female reindeer: insights from fractal analysis, correlated random walks, and Lévy flights. Can J Zoolog 2002; 80(5): 854-865.
36. Choi K-H, Kim J-S, Kim YS, et al. Pattern detection of movement behaviors in genotype variation of Drosophila melanogaster by using self-organizing map. Ecol Inform 2006; 1(3): 219-228.
37. Nams VO. Using animal movement paths to measure response to spatial scale. Oecologia 2005; 143(2): 179-188.
38. With KA. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. Landscape Ecol 1994; 9(1): 25-36.
39. Bertrand S, Bertrand A, Guevara-Carrasco R, et al. Scale-invariant movements of fishermen: the same foraging strategy as natural predators. Ecol Appl 2007; 17(2): 331-337.
40. Sevcik C. A procedure to estimate the fractal dimension of waveforms. Complex Int 1998; 5: 19 pp.
41. Füchslin RM, Shen Y and Meier PF. An efficient algorithm to determine fractal dimensions of point sets. Phys Lett A 2001; 285(1-2): 69-75.
42. Li X, Han J and Kim S. Motion-Alert: automatic anomaly detection in massive moving objects. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, 2006, pp. 166-177. San Diego, Ca, USA: IEEE.
43. Sage B. Identification of ''high risk vessels'' in coastal waters. Mar Policy 2005; 29(4): 349-355.
44. Bomberger N, Rhodes B, Seibert M, et al. Associative learning of vessel motion patterns for maritime situation awareness. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on information fusion, 2006 July 10-13; pp. 1-8. Florence, Italy: IEEE.
45. Mills CM, Townsend SE, Jennings S, et al. Estimating high resolution trawl fishing effort from satellite-based vessel monitoring system data. ICES J Mar Sci 2006; 64(2): 248-255.
46. Deng R, Dichmont C, Milton D, et al. Can vessel monitoring system data also be used to study trawling intensity and population depletion? The example of Australia's northern prawn fishery. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2005; 62(3): 611-622.
47. Murawski SA, Wigley SE, Fogarty MJ, et al. Effort distribution and catch patterns adjacent to temperate MPAs. ICES J Mar Sci 2005; 62(6): 1150-1167.
48. Mullowney DR and Dawe EG. Development of performance indices for the Newfoundland and Labrador snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) fishery using data from a vessel monitoring system. Fish Res 2009; 100(3): 248-254.
49. Lundblad P, Jern M and Forsell C. Voyage analysis applied to geovisual analytics. In: IEEE international conference on information visualization, 2008 July 9-11; pp. 381-388. London: IEEE Computer Society.
50. Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Jankowski P, et al. Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: setting the research agenda. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 2007; 21(8): 839-857.
51. Thomas J and Cook K. Illuminating the path: research and development agenda for visual analytics. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
52. Wang Baldonado MQ, Woodruff A and Kuchinsky A. Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. In: Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces, AVI '00, 2000 May 24-26; Palermo, Italy, pp. 110-119. New York: ACM.
53. Tremblay Y, Shaffer SA, Fowler SL, et al. Interpolation of animal tracking data in a fluid environment. J Exp Biol 2006; 209(1): 128-140.
54. Ware C. Information visualization: perception for design. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2004.
55. Hering E. Outlines of a theory of the light sense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.
56. Neuman WL. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.
57. Plaisant C. The challenge of information visualization. In: Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces, ACI '04, 2004; May 25-28: Gallipoli, Italy, pp. 319-340. New York: ACM.
58. Carpendale S. Evaluating information visualizations. In: Kerren A, Stasko JT, Fekete J-D, et al. (eds) Information visualization: human-centered issues and perspectives, LNCS. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2008, pp. 19-45.
59. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manag Informat Syst 1989; 13(3): 319-340. of Canada